Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1176382 > unrolled thread

Bug#1056984: bind9: regression: the branch 9.19 misses some commits from the branch 9.18

Started byArnaud Rebillout <arnaudr@kali.org>
First post2023-11-27 15:20 +0100
Last post2023-12-19 16:40 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist


Contents

  Bug#1056984: bind9: regression: the branch 9.19 misses some commits from the branch 9.18 Arnaud Rebillout <arnaudr@kali.org> - 2023-11-27 15:20 +0100
    Bug#1056984: bind9: regression: the branch 9.19 misses some commits from the branch 9.18 Bernhard Schmidt <berni@debian.org> - 2023-12-19 16:40 +0100

#1176382 — Bug#1056984: bind9: regression: the branch 9.19 misses some commits from the branch 9.18

FromArnaud Rebillout <arnaudr@kali.org>
Date2023-11-27 15:20 +0100
SubjectBug#1056984: bind9: regression: the branch 9.19 misses some commits from the branch 9.18
Message-ID<HEKCR-8TdX-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Source: bind9
Version: 1:9.19.17-1
Severity: normal
User: devel@kali.org
Usertags: origin-kali

Dear Maintainer,

In https://bugs.debian.org/1025519 was reported a bug in bind9 apparmor
configuration. It was fixed on the branch `debian/9.18`, with commit
https://salsa.debian.org/dns-team/bind9/-/commit/5c03f25e, and released
version `1:9.18.10-2` of bind9 (released in December 2022).

However today the issue is back. The regression is due to the fact that
the commit 5c03f25e was not applied in the branch `debian/9.19`, which
is currently in Debian unstable.

Looking at the changelog (on branch `debian/9.19`), it jumps straight
from `9.18.2-1` to `9.19.0-1`, makes me wonder how many good commits
from the branch 9.18 are missing in the branch 9.19... Please have a
look, and at least apply 5c03f25e, it's a must!

Thanks in advance,

Arnaud

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1179332

FromBernhard Schmidt <berni@debian.org>
Date2023-12-19 16:40 +0100
Message-ID<HMKml-eFbp-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1176382
Control: forwarded -1 https://salsa.debian.org/dns-team/bind9/-/merge_requests/26

On 27/11/23 09:12 PM, Arnaud Rebillout wrote:

Hi,

> In https://bugs.debian.org/1025519 was reported a bug in bind9 apparmor
> configuration. It was fixed on the branch `debian/9.18`, with commit
> https://salsa.debian.org/dns-team/bind9/-/commit/5c03f25e, and released
> version `1:9.18.10-2` of bind9 (released in December 2022).
> 
> However today the issue is back. The regression is due to the fact that
> the commit 5c03f25e was not applied in the branch `debian/9.19`, which
> is currently in Debian unstable.
> 
> Looking at the changelog (on branch `debian/9.19`), it jumps straight
> from `9.18.2-1` to `9.19.0-1`, makes me wonder how many good commits
> from the branch 9.18 are missing in the branch 9.19... Please have a
> look, and at least apply 5c03f25e, it's a must!

I have taken a look and identified four missing commits. 

@Ondrej: Could you have a look at
https://salsa.debian.org/dns-team/bind9/-/merge_requests/26 ?

Bernhard

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist


csiph-web