Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1153956 > unrolled thread

Bug#1036904: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Bug#1036904: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1 Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> - 2023-07-12 23:10 +0200
    Bug#1036904: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1 Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> - 2023-07-13 07:00 +0200
      Bug#1036904: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1 Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> - 2023-07-17 19:30 +0200
        Bug#1036904: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1 Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> - 2023-07-17 19:40 +0200
          Bug#1036904: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1 Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> - 2023-07-17 20:00 +0200

#1153956 — Bug#1036904: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1

Control: tag -1 confirmed

Hi,

On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 09:11:14AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> Update to "current" version. (Latest version of stable branch)
> 
> Same reasoning as of #1035056.
> 
> This updates LibreOffice to the last version in the (dead, EOL is June 12) 7.4.x line[1]
> to fix a sh*load of bugs. List of bugs fixed: See [2]

Given the comprehensive test suite and upstream's track record of limiting
stable branches to bug fixes only, I have reviewed debian/* but not the
entire diff. Please go ahead with uploading it.

> [ Changes ]
> 1.  upstream update 7.4.5 -> 7.4.7. The two patches removed are security
> fixes which were already in 7.4.6 and 7.4.7 and now of course removed.
> No need to mention that in the changelog, it's implied by "New upstream
> release" that patches upstream are dropped.

Actually it's really helpful to have the dropped patches listed, if
feasible. That allows a review to check that the intended patches, and only
those, have been dropped.

> [ Other info ]
> I can back out the fix for 3. The other two are simply not discussable
> given #1035056.

You can leave 3 in. I'm disappointed by your reluctance to even engage in
discussing the other two but also understand that bug has been the source
of some frustration for you.

> I know this is completely bending the rules, but so is #1035056, too
> If you wish I can make this also -0deb12u1, but as there will be no
> 7.4.7-1 probably thia is not exactly needed.
 
The version is fine. It may or may not make it into 12.1 depending on build
times; we'll do our best.

Thanks,

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1153987

Hi,

Am 12.07.23 um 23:01 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
> [...]
> The version is fine. It may or may not make it into 12.1 depending on build
> times; we'll do our best.

Uploaded, thanks.


Regards,


Rene

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1154654

Hi,

With the FTBFS of mipsel/mip64el in sid we need to make a choice before the
weekend:

 - defer libreoffice update until 12.2, probably some time in the Autumn
 - propogate 4:7.4.7-1 to sid on those architectures, and testing on all
   architectures, if it passes installability tests there

Which would you prefer?

Thanks,

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1154656

Hi,

Am 17.07.23 um 19:24 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire:
> Hi,
>
> With the FTBFS of mipsel/mip64el in sid we need to make a choice before the
> weekend:
>
>   - defer libreoffice update until 12.2, probably some time in the Autumn
>   - propogate 4:7.4.7-1 to sid on those architectures, and testing on all
>     architectures, if it passes installability tests there
> Which would you prefer?

The latter.


Given no answer on - mips for anything the last months I tend to just 
file a RM bug for sid for mipsel anyway as that one is completely broken 
and is probably even since a few releases.

Probably should do for mips64el, too....


Regards,


Rene

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1154658

Hi again,

Am 17.07.23 um 19:35 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> Hi,
>
> Am 17.07.23 um 19:24 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With the FTBFS of mipsel/mip64el in sid we need to make a choice 
>> before the
>> weekend:
>>
>>   - defer libreoffice update until 12.2, probably some time in the 
>> Autumn
>>   - propogate 4:7.4.7-1 to sid on those architectures, and testing on 
>> all
>>     architectures, if it passes installability tests there
>> Which would you prefer?
>
> The latter.
>
>
> Given no answer on - mips for anything the last months I tend to just 
> file a RM bug for sid for mipsel anyway as that one is completely 
> broken and is probably even since a few releases.
Filed as #1041340
>
> Probably should do for mips64el, too....
>
That one not yet.


Regards,


Rene

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist

csiph-web