Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1149099 > unrolled thread

Bug#1037250: ITP: fangfrisch -- Update and verify unofficial Clam Anti-Virus signatures

Started byGürkan Myczko <gurkan@phys.ethz.ch>
First post2023-06-09 13:00 +0200
Last post2023-06-12 12:50 +0200
Articles 6 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist


Contents

  Bug#1037250: ITP: fangfrisch -- Update and verify unofficial Clam Anti-Virus signatures Gürkan Myczko <gurkan@phys.ethz.ch> - 2023-06-09 13:00 +0200
    Bug#1037250: ITP: fangfrisch -- Update and verify unofficial Clam Anti-Virus signatures Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-10 09:00 +0200
      Bug#1037250: ITP: fangfrisch -- Update and verify unofficial Clam Anti-Virus signatures Ralph Seichter <fangfrisch@seichter.de> - 2023-06-10 10:50 +0200
      Re: Bug#1037250: ITP: fangfrisch -- Update and verify unofficial Clam Anti-Virus signatures Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2023-06-10 16:00 +0200
        Re: Bug#1037250: ITP: fangfrisch -- Update and verify unofficial  Clam Anti-Virus signatures Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-11 07:40 +0200
          Bug#1037250: ITP: fangfrisch -- Update and verify unofficial Clam Anti-Virus signatures Ralph Seichter <fangfrisch@seichter.de> - 2023-06-12 12:50 +0200

#1149099 — Bug#1037250: ITP: fangfrisch -- Update and verify unofficial Clam Anti-Virus signatures

FromGürkan Myczko <gurkan@phys.ethz.ch>
Date2023-06-09 13:00 +0200
SubjectBug#1037250: ITP: fangfrisch -- Update and verify unofficial Clam Anti-Virus signatures
Message-ID<GEI0x-eIqp-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gürkan Myczko <tar@debian.org>
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, maegger@ee.ethz.ch, 
carnil@debian.org

* Package name    : fangfrisch
   Version         : 1.6.1
   Upstream Authors: Ralph Seichter
   URL             : https://github.com/rseichter/fangfrisch
* License         : GPL-3-or-later
   Description     : Update and verify unofficial Clam Anti-Virus 
signatures
  This is a sibling of the Clam Anti-Virus freshclam utility. It allows
  downloading virus definition files that are not official ClamAV canon,
  e.g. from Sanesecurity, URLhaus and others. Fangfrisch was designed 
with
  security in mind, to be run by an unprivileged user only.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1149153

FromPaul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Date2023-06-10 09:00 +0200
Message-ID<GF0JP-eU59-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1149099

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, 2023-06-09 at 12:46 +0200, Gürkan Myczko wrote:

>    Description     : Update and verify unofficial Clam Anti-Virus signatures
>   This is a sibling of the Clam Anti-Virus freshclam utility. It allows
>   downloading virus definition files that are not official ClamAV canon,
>   e.g. from Sanesecurity, URLhaus and others.

I was under the impression that ClamAV itself now has options to
download unofficial signatures, is that the case or was that removed?

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1149157

FromRalph Seichter <fangfrisch@seichter.de>
Date2023-06-10 10:50 +0200
Message-ID<GF2si-eVaI-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1149153
* Paul Wise:

 > I was under the impression that ClamAV itself now has options
 > to download unofficial signatures, is that the case or was that
 > removed?

Not to toot my own horn, but Fangfrisch is more flexible than
freshclam, both in terms of retrieving signature files and
configuration. It also supports several signature providers out
of the box [1], and Gentoo Linux recommends using it as well [2].

I have been using Fangfrisch for both myself and for my customers'
production servers for years without a hitch, and I'd be happy to
answer any additional questions you might have.

-Ralph

[1] https://rseichter.github.io/fangfrisch/#_default_providers
[2] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/ClamAV_Unofficial_Signatures

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1149169

FromScott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
Date2023-06-10 16:00 +0200
Message-ID<GF7ih-eXXu-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1149153

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Saturday, June 10, 2023 2:49:29 AM EDT Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-06-09 at 12:46 +0200, Gürkan Myczko wrote:
> >    Description     : Update and verify unofficial Clam Anti-Virus
> > signatures This is a sibling of the Clam Anti-Virus freshclam utility. It
> > allows downloading virus definition files that are not official ClamAV
> > canon, e.g. from Sanesecurity, URLhaus and others.
> 
> I was under the impression that ClamAV itself now has options to
> download unofficial signatures, is that the case or was that removed?

It does, but I think Fangfrisch is still a useful thing to have in Debian.

Scott K

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1149194 — Re: Bug#1037250: ITP: fangfrisch -- Update and verify unofficial Clam Anti-Virus signatures

FromPaul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Date2023-06-11 07:40 +0200
SubjectRe: Bug#1037250: ITP: fangfrisch -- Update and verify unofficial Clam Anti-Virus signatures
Message-ID<GFlXY-f6Sh-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1149169

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Sat, 2023-06-10 at 09:50 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:

> It does, but I think Fangfrisch is still a useful thing to have in Debian.

I wonder if there is any tool that generates and/or contains the
appropriate ClamAV configs for popular unofficial signatures,
rather than manually downloading those signatures themselves.

Perhaps Fangfrisch should become such a tool?

Or is ClamAV upstream interested in such a tool/config?

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1149303

FromRalph Seichter <fangfrisch@seichter.de>
Date2023-06-12 12:50 +0200
Message-ID<GFNhv-fnDw-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1149194
* Paul Wise:

 > I wonder if there is any tool that generates and/or contains the
 > appropriate ClamAV configs for popular unofficial signatures,
 > rather than manually downloading those signatures themselves.

What do you mean by "manually downloading"? Fangfrisch is meant
to be invoked by a scheduler like cron, verifies the integrity
of downloads, avoids unnecessary downloads altogether, renames
signature files if so desired by the user -- all without user
interaction. Also, downloads (i.e. URL-based access) are handled
using the Requests library [1], possibly the most popular Python
library available for this purpose?

 > Perhaps Fangfrisch should become such a tool?

I am unsure what exactly you are suggesting. Do you propose I
remove existing functionality, proven robust? Functionality
which freshclam does not offer as of June 2023?

-Ralph

[1] https://requests.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist


csiph-web