Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1148991 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-06-07 18:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2023-06-07 18:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#1037056: bookworm-pu: package libreswan/4.10-2+deb12u1 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2023-06-07 18:20 +0200
| From | "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-07 18:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1037056: bookworm-pu: package libreswan/4.10-2+deb12u1 |
| Message-ID | <GE437-ejGh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Fri, 2023-06-02 at 18:54 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Uploading libreswan 4.19-1+deb12u1 should address #1035542 (aka > CVE-2023-30570), which addresses a potential DoS against libreswan > instances that use a certain IKEv1 configuration. > > Discussion with Salvatore Bonaccorso over in #1035542 concluded that > using point releases for this should be sufficient. > fwiw, because you already uploaded this, it hit testing-proposed- updates, where it got autobuilt without any review from the Release Team (as the approval boundary there is tpu -> testing, rather than stable-new -> pu). Hopefully that shouldn't make any practical difference, I'm just mentioning it in case it was unexpected. (It will also need a bit of handholding to get our tooling to recognise it properly once the release has happened, but it's not the only package in that situation.) Regards, Adam
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web