Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1148872 > unrolled thread

Bug#1013298: O: flycheck -- modern on-the-fly syntax checking for Emacs

Started byAntoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org>
First post2023-06-06 18:10 +0200
Last post2023-06-06 23:30 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#1013298: O: flycheck -- modern on-the-fly syntax checking for Emacs Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2023-06-06 18:10 +0200
    Bug#1013298: O: flycheck -- modern on-the-fly syntax checking for Emacs Denis Danilov <danilovdenis@yandex.ru> - 2023-06-06 23:20 +0200
      Bug#1013298: O: flycheck -- modern on-the-fly syntax checking for Emacs Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2023-06-06 23:30 +0200

#1148872 — Bug#1013298: O: flycheck -- modern on-the-fly syntax checking for Emacs

FromAntoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org>
Date2023-06-06 18:10 +0200
SubjectBug#1013298: O: flycheck -- modern on-the-fly syntax checking for Emacs
Message-ID<GDHpT-e5tc-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Control: tags -1 +pending
Control: owner -1 anarcat@debian.org

On 2022-06-21 07:36:09, Denis Danilov wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
> Control: affects -1 src:flycheck
>
> I intend to orphan the flycheck package.

I intend to adopt the package. It seems like the next step for the
package is to update it to the latest release (32) from May 2022.

Have you tried doing that upgrade or is there any peculiar reason why
we're at a git snapshot still?

Thanks for maintaining flycheck!

-- 
I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.
                        - Thomas Jefferson

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1148901

FromDenis Danilov <danilovdenis@yandex.ru>
Date2023-06-06 23:20 +0200
Message-ID<GDMfT-e8nD-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1148872
Hi Antoine,

On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:00:02PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> I intend to adopt the package. It seems like the next step for the
> package is to update it to the latest release (32) from May 2022.
> 
> Have you tried doing that upgrade or is there any peculiar reason why
> we're at a git snapshot still?

From a technical perspective there is no reason to stay on the git snapshot
version. Salsa repo https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/flycheck is already
updated to latest flycheck release 32.  But I did not manage to find a sponsor
to upload it. That's one part of the problem. Another part of it: people
ignore the salsa repo and prefer to stick to git snapshot (for whatever
reason), see recent versions 32~git.20200527.9c435db3-3 and
32~git.20200527.9c435db3-4. Hopefully you will have more luck to sort the
things out.

Thanks and best regards,
Denis

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1148902

FromAntoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org>
Date2023-06-06 23:30 +0200
Message-ID<GDMpz-e8qM-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1148901
On 2023-06-06 23:05:04, Denis Danilov wrote:
> Hi Antoine,
>
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:00:02PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> I intend to adopt the package. It seems like the next step for the
>> package is to update it to the latest release (32) from May 2022.
>> 
>> Have you tried doing that upgrade or is there any peculiar reason why
>> we're at a git snapshot still?
>
> From a technical perspective there is no reason to stay on the git snapshot
> version. Salsa repo https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/flycheck is already
> updated to latest flycheck release 32.  But I did not manage to find a sponsor
> to upload it. That's one part of the problem. Another part of it: people
> ignore the salsa repo and prefer to stick to git snapshot (for whatever
> reason), see recent versions 32~git.20200527.9c435db3-3 and
> 32~git.20200527.9c435db3-4. Hopefully you will have more luck to sort the
> things out.

Oh. Weird. Looks like the team didn't do its job then, that's
unfortunate.

Thanks for the heads up, I'll make sure to include your good work!

As an aside, do you have any thoughts on flymake in recent Emacs
releases? Is flycheck still relevant?

I've asked upstream to update their comparison to get a better idea:

https://github.com/flycheck/flycheck/issues/2023

-- 
La guerre, c'est le massacre d'hommes qui ne se connaissent pas,
au profit d'hommes qui se connaissent mais ne se massacreront pas.
                        - Paul Valéry

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist


csiph-web