Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1147613 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Leandro Cunha <leandrocunha016@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-05-23 08:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2023-05-28 15:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
Bug#1036591: reaver: segmentation fault Leandro Cunha <leandrocunha016@gmail.com> - 2023-05-23 08:50 +0200
Bug#1036591: reaver: segmentation fault Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> - 2023-05-23 22:40 +0200
Bug#1036591: reaver: segmentation fault Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> - 2023-05-24 00:40 +0200
Bug#1036591: reaver: segmentation fault Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> - 2023-05-24 10:10 +0200
Bug#1036591: reaver: segmentation fault Bartosz Fenski <bartosz@fenski.pl> - 2023-05-28 15:50 +0200
| From | Leandro Cunha <leandrocunha016@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-23 08:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1036591: reaver: segmentation fault |
| Message-ID | <Gyu0h-aPGQ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Package: reaver Version: 1.6.5-1+b1 Severity: grave Justification: package unusable Tags: fixed Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? The package has a segmentation fault on any command I tried to run, but I've used this package in the past and it was working and I think some more up-to-date dependency is causing this. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Executing multiple commands. * What was the outcome of this action? Every command executed returns segmentation fault. * What outcome did you expect instead? The correct thing is that all commands were executed correctly. I tried compiling a newer version 1.6.6 and it worked fine with no segmentation fault. Plus several improvements upstream. Remembering that this packaging is unusable in the face of tests carried out. Short description of what the segmentation fault is about in your description. In the context of segmentation fault, segment refers to the program memory address space. Only the program's memory space is readable. Of this space, only the stack and part of the data segment are writable. Other parts of the data segment and text segment are not writable. The data segment is where global or static variables reside. The text segment, also called the code segment, is where program instructions are stored. Segments have size and permissions, such as write, read, and execute. Segmentation fault occurs when a program tries to access restricted memory, such as trying to write to the text segment or read from a non-existent memory address. The failure is reported by the memory protection system of the Memory Management Unit or MMU. The MMU is the hardware responsible for translating the virtual memory address to physical addresses. As soon as the MMU notices a memory access violation, it informs the Kernel of the problem. In the case of Linux, the Kernel sends a signal to the program, the SEGV. Upon receiving the signal, the program is usually terminated. -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-9-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=pt_BR:pt:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages reaver depends on: ii libc6 2.36-9 ii libpcap0.8 1.10.3-1 Versions of packages reaver recommends: ii pixiewps 1.4.2-5 Versions of packages reaver suggests: ii aircrack-ng 1:1.7-5 -- no debconf information
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-23 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <GyGXv-aXBr-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1147613 |
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 04:38:26PM -0300, Leandro Cunha wrote: > Control: tags +1 fixed Please don't tag this "fixed". > However, the package is at risk with an NMU of see link for more information.[1] > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/PackageSalvaging Not sure what do you mean and how is that related to this bug, sorry.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Samuel Henrique <samueloph@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-24 00:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <GyIPD-aYJF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1147613 |
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:21:35PM +0100, Samuel Henrique wrote: > > Andrey, Leandro meant to use the "patch" tag instead of "fixed", here's his fix: > > https://salsa.debian.org/leandrocunha/reaver > Do you think this change will be approved for bookworm, especially at this > point in the freeze? I don't see any other better alternative. I don't think it's worthy to cherry-pick a single possible fix since the package might be broken in other ways as well. The correct action here is to update to 1.6.6, which has been released years ago and is being shipped by a lot of other distros. To be clear, I haven't tried to reproduce the issue myself, but it looks general enough and easy to do so, I'll do it in the next few days, but wanted to make sure we keep moving on fixing this. Cheers, -- Samuel Henrique <samueloph>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-24 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <GyRJf-b4o9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1147613 |
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 08:07:45PM -0300, Leandro Cunha wrote: > There was a user who reported that the problem also occurs in Debian > 11 (Bullseye). > But I can't confirm because I don't use stable. > Samuel, I know you use testing. > Andrey Rakhmatullin, do you use stable or do you have machines with stable? No. But if you don't have a fix suitable for stable it doesn't matter that much to confirm the bug there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bartosz Fenski <bartosz@fenski.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-28 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <GAoWt-c19I-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1147613 |
Hey, I'm fine with NMUing it. Thanks for your effort. regards Bartosz Fenski W dniu 23.05.2023 o 23:21, Samuel Henrique pisze: > Control: tags -1 patch fixed-upstream > > Hello Bartosz, > > We are planning to perform an NMU, changing the package's maintership > to the Security Tools team (while keeping you as an Uploader), fixing > this RC bug and filling an unblock request so we can ship this package > for bookworm. > > Please let me know if you disagree, we will have to act quickly due to > the freeze. > > Andrey, Leandro meant to use the "patch" tag instead of "fixed", here's his fix: > https://salsa.debian.org/leandrocunha/reaver > > Cheers, >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web