Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1135900 > unrolled thread

Bug#1030222: [DSE-Dev] Bug#1030222: selint: please restrict check only where valgrind is available

Started byAmin Bandali <amin.bandali@canonical.com>
First post2023-02-01 21:50 +0100
Last post2023-02-01 22:00 +0100
Articles 2 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#1030222: [DSE-Dev] Bug#1030222: selint: please restrict check only where valgrind is available Amin Bandali <amin.bandali@canonical.com> - 2023-02-01 21:50 +0100
    Bug#1030222: [DSE-Dev] Bug#1030222: selint: please restrict check only where valgrind is available Amin Bandali <amin.bandali@canonical.com> - 2023-02-01 22:00 +0100

#1135900 — Bug#1030222: [DSE-Dev] Bug#1030222: selint: please restrict check only where valgrind is available

FromAmin Bandali <amin.bandali@canonical.com>
Date2023-02-01 21:50 +0100
SubjectBug#1030222: [DSE-Dev] Bug#1030222: selint: please restrict check only where valgrind is available
Message-ID<FUsdj-2JSq-3@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hello there,

You might find it more convenient to depend on 'valgrind-if-available'
rather than 'valgrind' itself, per the attached patch.  It also skips
tests that need valgrind, for problematic arches.  What do you think?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1135905

FromAmin Bandali <amin.bandali@canonical.com>
Date2023-02-01 22:00 +0100
Message-ID<FUsmZ-2JVY-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1135900
Amin Bandali writes:

> Hello there,
>
> You might find it more convenient to depend on 'valgrind-if-available'
> rather than 'valgrind' itself, per the attached patch.  It also skips
> tests that need valgrind, for problematic arches.  What do you think?

To be fully clear, by "it" in "it also skips" I was referring to my
attached patch, not the act of depending on valgrind-if-available.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist


csiph-web