Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1102620 > unrolled thread

Bug#1010754: unblock: spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7 and unblock: spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3

Started byJulian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org>
First post2022-05-09 11:20 +0200
Last post2022-05-11 11:40 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist


Contents

  Bug#1010754: unblock: spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7 and unblock: spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3 Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2022-05-09 11:20 +0200
    Bug#1010754: unblock: spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7 and unblock: spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3 Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2022-05-10 08:50 +0200
      Bug#1010754: unblock: spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7 and unblock: spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3 Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2022-05-10 21:00 +0200
        Bug#1010754: unblock: spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7 and unblock: spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3 Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2022-05-11 11:40 +0200

#1102620 — Bug#1010754: unblock: spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7 and unblock: spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3

FromJulian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org>
Date2022-05-09 11:20 +0200
SubjectBug#1010754: unblock: spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7 and unblock: spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3
Message-ID<El7IB-eikv-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package spyder and spyder-unittest

(If this isn't the correct Usertags to use, please forgive me - I
couldn't figure out a better one.)

[ Reason ]

The binary packages of spyder (spyder, python3-spyder and
spyder-common) are all "Architecture: all".  However, the 5.x versions
of spyder (the previous one in stable was 4.x) now depend on
python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine, which is only available on six
architectures.  For this reason, spyder's autopkgtest has seen a
regression on ppc64el and s390x as the package is no longer
installable on those architectures.

spyder-unittest depends on spyder, and so has exactly the same issue.
And when spyder-notebook and spyder-terminal are ready, they will face
the same as well, in spite of being Architecture: all.

I don't know how to handle this situation - can the package be allowed
to migrate to testing and only appear in the Packages file for those
architectures on which python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine is available?  If
not, what should I do?

[ Impact ]

Spyder is a popular package and it would be very sad if it were not in
Debian in the future.

[ Tests ]

A large unit test suite.

[ Checklist ]

The checklist points do not seem to be relevant at this stage in the
release cycle


unblock spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7
unblock spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1102692

FromJulian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org>
Date2022-05-10 08:50 +0200
Message-ID<ElrQZ-eusc-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1102620
Hi Paul,

On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 10:15:33PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Julian,
> 
> On 09-05-2022 11:10, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Please unblock package spyder and spyder-unittest
> > 
> > (If this isn't the correct Usertags to use, please forgive me - I
> > couldn't figure out a better one.)
> [...]

Thanks very much for the explanation and unblocking!

Will I need to send such a request from now on every time I upload a
new version of spyder, or will it remember the current state and not
register an autopkgtest regression?

Best wishes,

   Julian

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1102736

FromPaul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
Date2022-05-10 21:00 +0200
Message-ID<ElDfr-eB78-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1102692

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi Julian,

On 10-05-2022 08:43, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Will I need to send such a request from now on every time I upload a
> new version of spyder, or will it remember the current state and not
> register an autopkgtest regression?

As the test now fails on those architectures *in* testing, it will not 
be considered a regression and hence from now on it will not require our 
intervention.

Paul

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1102789

FromJulian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org>
Date2022-05-11 11:40 +0200
Message-ID<ElQZ3-eJti-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1102736
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 07:57:26PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Julian,
> 
> On 10-05-2022 08:43, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Will I need to send such a request from now on every time I upload a
> > new version of spyder, or will it remember the current state and not
> > register an autopkgtest regression?
> 
> As the test now fails on those architectures *in* testing, it will not be
> considered a regression and hence from now on it will not require our
> intervention.
> 
> Paul

Ah, thanks Paul!

Best wishes,

   Julian

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist


csiph-web