Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1102620 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-05-09 11:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2022-05-11 11:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
Bug#1010754: unblock: spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7 and unblock: spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3 Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2022-05-09 11:20 +0200
Bug#1010754: unblock: spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7 and unblock: spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3 Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2022-05-10 08:50 +0200
Bug#1010754: unblock: spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7 and unblock: spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3 Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2022-05-10 21:00 +0200
Bug#1010754: unblock: spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7 and unblock: spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3 Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> - 2022-05-11 11:40 +0200
| From | Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-09 11:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1010754: unblock: spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7 and unblock: spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3 |
| Message-ID | <El7IB-eikv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package spyder and spyder-unittest (If this isn't the correct Usertags to use, please forgive me - I couldn't figure out a better one.) [ Reason ] The binary packages of spyder (spyder, python3-spyder and spyder-common) are all "Architecture: all". However, the 5.x versions of spyder (the previous one in stable was 4.x) now depend on python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine, which is only available on six architectures. For this reason, spyder's autopkgtest has seen a regression on ppc64el and s390x as the package is no longer installable on those architectures. spyder-unittest depends on spyder, and so has exactly the same issue. And when spyder-notebook and spyder-terminal are ready, they will face the same as well, in spite of being Architecture: all. I don't know how to handle this situation - can the package be allowed to migrate to testing and only appear in the Packages file for those architectures on which python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine is available? If not, what should I do? [ Impact ] Spyder is a popular package and it would be very sad if it were not in Debian in the future. [ Tests ] A large unit test suite. [ Checklist ] The checklist points do not seem to be relevant at this stage in the release cycle unblock spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7 unblock spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-10 08:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ElrQZ-eusc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1102620 |
Hi Paul, On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 10:15:33PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Julian, > > On 09-05-2022 11:10, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Please unblock package spyder and spyder-unittest > > > > (If this isn't the correct Usertags to use, please forgive me - I > > couldn't figure out a better one.) > [...] Thanks very much for the explanation and unblocking! Will I need to send such a request from now on every time I upload a new version of spyder, or will it remember the current state and not register an autopkgtest regression? Best wishes, Julian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-10 21:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ElDfr-eB78-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1102692 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi Julian, On 10-05-2022 08:43, Julian Gilbey wrote: > Will I need to send such a request from now on every time I upload a > new version of spyder, or will it remember the current state and not > register an autopkgtest regression? As the test now fails on those architectures *in* testing, it will not be considered a regression and hence from now on it will not require our intervention. Paul
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-11 11:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ElQZ3-eJti-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1102736 |
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 07:57:26PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Julian, > > On 10-05-2022 08:43, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Will I need to send such a request from now on every time I upload a > > new version of spyder, or will it remember the current state and not > > register an autopkgtest regression? > > As the test now fails on those architectures *in* testing, it will not be > considered a regression and hence from now on it will not require our > intervention. > > Paul Ah, thanks Paul! Best wishes, Julian
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web