Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1101783 > unrolled thread

Bug#1010372: mysql-8.0: Should mysql-8.0 be removed from unstable?

Started bySalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
First post2022-04-29 22:00 +0200
Last post2022-05-03 21:00 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist


Contents

  Bug#1010372: mysql-8.0: Should mysql-8.0 be removed from unstable? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-04-29 22:00 +0200
    Bug#1010372: [debian-mysql] Bug#1010372: mysql-8.0: Should mysql-8.0 be removed from unstable? Robie Basak <robie.basak@ubuntu.com> - 2022-05-03 18:10 +0200
      Bug#1010372: [debian-mysql] Bug#1010372: mysql-8.0: Should mysql-8.0 be removed from unstable? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2022-05-03 21:00 +0200

#1101783 — Bug#1010372: mysql-8.0: Should mysql-8.0 be removed from unstable?

FromSalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Date2022-04-29 22:00 +0200
SubjectBug#1010372: mysql-8.0: Should mysql-8.0 be removed from unstable?
Message-ID<EhEWu-c3Yo-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Source: mysql-8.0
Version: 8.0.23-3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: carnil@debian.org,team@security.debian.org,lars.tangvald@oracle.com,vorlon@debian.org,peb@debian.org

Hi

I noticed that mysql-8.0 is still in unstable with a quite ancient
version not having updated now for several Oracle CPU rounds.

Should mysql-8.0 be dropped completely from the archive or is there
still interest in keeping in in unstable?

There are in unstable two packages which will have broken
Build-Depends, thus CC'ing the interested parties as well.

myodbc: libmysqlclient-dev (>= 5.5.17)
pytest-services: mysql-testsuite-8.0

If you do agree on the removal, please reassign the bug against
ftp.debian.org (and asking as well for removing of the packages with
broken build-depends).

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1102132 — Bug#1010372: [debian-mysql] Bug#1010372: mysql-8.0: Should mysql-8.0 be removed from unstable?

FromRobie Basak <robie.basak@ubuntu.com>
Date2022-05-03 18:10 +0200
SubjectBug#1010372: [debian-mysql] Bug#1010372: mysql-8.0: Should mysql-8.0 be removed from unstable?
Message-ID<Ej3g5-cXwG-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1101783

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi Salvatore,

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 09:52:04PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Should mysql-8.0 be dropped completely from the archive or is there
> still interest in keeping in in unstable?

I think this is a dupe of
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004180? Was asking
again intentional?

My answer is the same - we'd like to keep mysql-8.0 in unstable and are
working on updating unstable and getting Ubuntu back into sync against
Debian.

At Canonical, I am onboarding a colleague who will be working on this.
Prompted again by you, we just set ourselves a goal of having this done
by the end of the month, if that's OK with you?

Thanks,

Robie

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1102151 — Bug#1010372: [debian-mysql] Bug#1010372: mysql-8.0: Should mysql-8.0 be removed from unstable?

FromSalvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Date2022-05-03 21:00 +0200
SubjectBug#1010372: [debian-mysql] Bug#1010372: mysql-8.0: Should mysql-8.0 be removed from unstable?
Message-ID<Ej5UB-cZ0h-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1102132
Control: forcemerge 1004180 1010372

Hi Robie,

On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 04:51:54PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
> 
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 09:52:04PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Should mysql-8.0 be dropped completely from the archive or is there
> > still interest in keeping in in unstable?
> 
> I think this is a dupe of
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004180? Was asking
> again intentional?

Ah, no sort of combination of a) human error, b) triggering the
question given there was no movement since some Oracle CPUs on the
version. Let's merge the both.

> My answer is the same - we'd like to keep mysql-8.0 in unstable and are
> working on updating unstable and getting Ubuntu back into sync against
> Debian.
> 
> At Canonical, I am onboarding a colleague who will be working on this.
> Prompted again by you, we just set ourselves a goal of having this done
> by the end of the month, if that's OK with you?

Okay. but then I hope this can happen soon. As said above I did forgot
I already asked, and did overlook we had already #1004180, but my
worry is still the same. Even if it's only in unstable, the current
list from
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/mysql-8.0
is getting huge.

Thanks in any case if you pick it up and keep then unstable and get
back on track for the version.

Regards,
Salvatore

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist


csiph-web