Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1111486 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dominique Dumont <domi.dumont@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-07-30 19:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2022-07-31 19:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#1016305: nodejs: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:504: test-ci-js] Error 1 Dominique Dumont <domi.dumont@free.fr> - 2022-07-30 19:30 +0200
Bug#1016305: nodejs: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:504: test-ci-js] Error 1 Jérémy Lal <kapouer@melix.org> - 2022-07-30 19:40 +0200
Bug#1016305: nodejs: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:504: test-ci-js] Error 1 Dominique Dumont <domi.dumont@free.fr> - 2022-07-31 16:40 +0200
Bug#1016305: nodejs: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:504: test-ci-js] Error 1 Dominique Dumont <domi.dumont@free.fr> - 2022-07-31 19:20 +0200
| From | Dominique Dumont <domi.dumont@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-07-30 19:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1016305: nodejs: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:504: test-ci-js] Error 1 |
| Message-ID | <EOYrL-eRWC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Saturday, 30 July 2022 17:25:29 CEST you wrote: > libuv1 maintainer: please avoid uploading new versions when nodejs is > in transition... I package libuv1 because it's a dependency of moarvm. I don't follow nodejs releases, so I was not aware of on-going transition and I did not expect problems because only the minor version number was increased. On the other hand, I have no problem with delaying uploads of libuv1 provided someone warns me of issues in other packages. All the best
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jérémy Lal <kapouer@melix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-07-30 19:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EOYBr-eRZI-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1111486 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Le sam. 30 juil. 2022 à 19:24, Dominique Dumont <domi.dumont@free.fr> a écrit : > On Saturday, 30 July 2022 17:25:29 CEST you wrote: > > libuv1 maintainer: please avoid uploading new versions when nodejs is > > in transition... > > I package libuv1 because it's a dependency of moarvm. > > I don't follow nodejs releases, so I was not aware of on-going transition > and > I did not expect problems because only the minor version number was > increased. > > On the other hand, I have no problem with delaying uploads of libuv1 > provided > someone warns me of issues in other packages. libuv1 is a library, you're supposed to manage the transition: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions In particular, rebuild all reverse build dependencies and check they won't break is highly desirable. There are tools and services in debian to do that (though honestly it's not so easy to setup). Reverse Build-depends in main: ------------------------------ ardour bind9 cmake csound-plugins dnsjit dnswire dqlite driftnet forked-daapd getdns golang-github-evanw-esbuild h2o haxe hddemux janus kamailio knot-resolver libstorj libwebsockets lua-luv lua-nvim macaulay2 moarvm mosquitto neovim netdata node-expat node-fbjs node-grunt-sass node-iconv node-jasmine node-leveldown node-modern-syslog node-nan node-node-sass node-nouislider node-opencv node-pause node-pre-gyp node-re2 node-react node-rollup-plugin-sass node-shiny-server node-sqlite3 node-websocket node-ws node-zx nodejs npm nqp ocaml-luv passenger pcp polybar python-gevent r-cran-fs r-cran-httpuv r-cran-v8 radare2 radare2-cutter raft rakudo rtpengine select2.js siridb-server swupdate tensorpipe ttyd uvloop Found a total of 69 reverse build-depend(s) for libuv1-dev. Jérémy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dominique Dumont <domi.dumont@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-07-31 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EPigN-f3Jf-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1111489 |
On Saturday, 30 July 2022 19:36:26 CEST you wrote: > libuv1 is a library, you're supposed to manage the transition: > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions This page applies when the new version breaks the ABI or API. This was not the case. There was no symbol change. The SO version of libuv1 has not changed since the transition between libuv and libuv1. > In particular, rebuild all reverse build dependencies and check they won't break is highly desirable. > There are tools and services in debian to do that (though honestly it's not so easy to setup). I'm already stretched quite thin. I'll see what I can do. In any case, I'd be happy to handover libuv1 to people willing to better maintain this package. All the best.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dominique Dumont <domi.dumont@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-07-31 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EPkLD-f5lk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1111566 |
On Sunday, 31 July 2022 16:35:12 CEST Jérémy Lal wrote: > Indeed, sorry for my somewhat irritated tone - it just happens that it was > the second time libuv1 was updated during a nodejs transition, and the > upstream bug it creates on nodejs hasn't been fixed yet, so it shoots the > transition in the guts. > Nodejs depends heavily on libuv1... I understand your furstration. Sorry about the mess. > Maybe a simple approach would be to upload libuv1 updates to experimental > first, and wait a week to see how it scares the others :) That I can do. All the best.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web