Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1110599 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Marc Haber <mh+debian-packages@zugschlus.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-07-22 11:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2022-07-23 01:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#1012420: no_del_paths includes /srv? Marc Haber <mh+debian-packages@zugschlus.de> - 2022-07-22 11:50 +0200
Bug#1012420: no_del_paths includes /srv? Matt Barry <matt@hazelmollusk.org> - 2022-07-23 01:20 +0200
| From | Marc Haber <mh+debian-packages@zugschlus.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-07-22 11:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1012420: no_del_paths includes /srv? |
| Message-ID | <ELXsd-d2sh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 03:26:24PM -0400, Matt Barry wrote: > AIUI /srv is under the purview of the sysadmin; if they decide to set > DHOME somewhere under /srv, shouldn't this behave the same as with > /home? I find it sensible that the default of no_del_path includes /srv. If the local admin decides to violate FHS by putting a user's home dir there, they can also change no_del_path. We have user's home directores in /var as well for a bunch of system users and we still have /var in no_del_path's default. Greetings Marc
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Matt Barry <matt@hazelmollusk.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-07-23 01:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EMa65-daDa-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1110599 |
tags -1 + wontfix thanks On Fri, 2022-07-22 at 11:44 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 03:26:24PM -0400, Matt Barry wrote: > > AIUI /srv is under the purview of the sysadmin; if they decide to > > set > > DHOME somewhere under /srv, shouldn't this behave the same as with > > /home? > > I find it sensible that the default of no_del_path includes /srv. If > the > local admin decides to violate FHS by putting a user's home dir > there, > they can also change no_del_path. We have user's home directores in > /var > as well for a bunch of system users and we still have /var in > no_del_path's default. I just looked more carefully at the FHS, and it is clear you are correct. cf 3.17.1: "Distributions must take care not to remove locally placed files in these directories without administrator permission." Tagging this wontfix.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web