Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1080510 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-11-09 22:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2021-12-28 13:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
Bug#999100: pidgin-blinklight: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2021-11-09 22:50 +0100
Bug#999100: pidgin-blinklight: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> - 2021-12-12 12:10 +0100
Bug#999100: pidgin-blinklight: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2021-12-28 13:20 +0100
| From | Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-11-09 22:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#999100: pidgin-blinklight: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep |
| Message-ID | <DhHac-39a-51@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Source: pidgin-blinklight Version: 0.11.1-3 Severity: important Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 Tags: bookworm sid User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep Dear maintainer, Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be affected by this issue. This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html . The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. Best, Lucas
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-12 12:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DtuTT-7Mu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1080510 |
Hi, Am Dienstag, dem 09.11.2021 um 22:28 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software > could benefit from a refresh. indeed. I wonder if anyone is still using this (I am not). If you do, please speak up! Cheers, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner • nomeata@debian.org • https://j.oach.im/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-12-28 13:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DzjCp-2vY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1085214 |
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 11:58:34AM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, > > Am Dienstag, dem 09.11.2021 um 22:28 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > > Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software > > could benefit from a refresh. > > indeed. I wonder if anyone is still using this (I am not). If you do, > please speak up! A comment in the BTS is not a good way to get feedback from users. Chances are most users (if any) are using either Debian stable or Ubuntu. The relevant question would be if it still works, if yes then chances are that there are still users. > Cheers, > Joachim cu Adrian
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web