Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1077882 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-10-24 21:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2021-10-24 23:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#997799: feynmf: Use disappeared /bin/tempfile in debian patch Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> - 2021-10-24 21:20 +0200
Bug#997799: feynmf: Use disappeared /bin/tempfile in debian patch Clint Adams <clint@debian.org> - 2021-10-24 23:00 +0200
| From | Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-24 21:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#997799: feynmf: Use disappeared /bin/tempfile in debian patch |
| Message-ID | <DbRcd-5jB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 15:00:17 -0400 Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> wrote: > Package: feynmf > Severity: grave > Version: 1.08-12 > Tags: sid bookworm > X-Debbugs-CC: alteholz@debian.org > > Dear Debian feynmf package maintainer, > > The custom patch introduced by Debian at > https://sources.debian.org/src/feynmf/1.08-12/debian/patches/docu.patch/ uses > /bin/tempfile, which has disappeared in newer Debian systems. This will likely > cause the program to crash. Please consider replacing it with "/bin/mktemp" > from coreutils instead. I just realized the ongoing discussion at https://bugs.debian.org/994275 , which may mitigate the impact of this bug report. Now I believe depending on either tempfile(1) or mktemp(1) should be ok. Thanks, Boyuan Yang
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clint Adams <clint@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-24 23:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <DbSL0-65M-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1077882 |
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 03:09:46PM -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote: > I just realized the ongoing discussion at https://bugs.debian.org/994275 , > which may mitigate the impact of this bug report. Now I believe depending on > either tempfile(1) or mktemp(1) should be ok. I would recommend switching to mktemp(1) regardless. There is no possible final outcome wherein any version of tempfile(1) would be a better choice.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web