Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1092438 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Fabio Fantoni <fantonifabio@tiscali.it> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-02-08 13:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2022-02-10 23:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#481468: memtest86+: Should not run update-grub unconditionally in postinst Fabio Fantoni <fantonifabio@tiscali.it> - 2022-02-08 13:50 +0100
Bug#481468: memtest86+: Should not run update-grub unconditionally in postinst Olaf Buddenhagen <olafbuddenhagen@gmx.net> - 2022-02-10 21:40 +0100
Bug#481468: memtest86+: Should not run update-grub unconditionally in postinst Fabio Fantoni <fantonifabio@tiscali.it> - 2022-02-10 23:40 +0100
| From | Fabio Fantoni <fantonifabio@tiscali.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-08 13:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#481468: memtest86+: Should not run update-grub unconditionally in postinst |
| Message-ID | <DOy6t-oDg-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi, /etc/kernel-img.conf seems specific options related to kernel so I don't think is good do some additional condition based on it, I don't know other similar option that can be used out of this. If there are other possibilities or the problem is relevant please tell me I will reconsider it.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olaf Buddenhagen <olafbuddenhagen@gmx.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-10 21:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DPooq-VGb-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1092438 |
Hi, On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 01:39:58PM +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Hi, /etc/kernel-img.conf seems specific options related to kernel so I don't > think is good do some additional condition based on it, I don't know other > similar option that can be used out of this. Well, first of all, I'm using update-grub nowadays -- so I don't personally care any more... To be honest, I didn't even remember filing this issue back then :-) Fundamentally, memtest behaves largely like a kernel image for most intents and purposes -- so using options from /etc/kernel-img.conf would make sense in principle... However, the options in question for disabling update-grub etc. seem to have been dropped altogether: which I guess is the source of the confusion here -- best I can tell, this bug is simply obsolete at this point... -antrik-
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabio Fantoni <fantonifabio@tiscali.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-02-10 23:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DPqgx-WOt-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1092707 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Il 10/02/2022 21:35, Olaf Buddenhagen ha scritto: > Hi, > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 01:39:58PM +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote: > >> Hi, /etc/kernel-img.conf seems specific options related to kernel so I don't >> think is good do some additional condition based on it, I don't know other >> similar option that can be used out of this. > Well, first of all, I'm using update-grub nowadays -- so I don't > personally care any more... To be honest, I didn't even remember filing > this issue back then :-) > > Fundamentally, memtest behaves largely like a kernel image for most > intents and purposes -- so using options from /etc/kernel-img.conf would > make sense in principle... However, the options in question for > disabling update-grub etc. seem to have been dropped altogether: which I > guess is the source of the confusion here -- best I can tell, this bug > is simply obsolete at this point... > > -antrik- Thanks for your reply, I recently become the new maintainer and am reviewing all open bugs. This bug report even if is near 14 years old and the proposed modification did not seem optimal to me it still seemed good to ask to be sure if the problem persisted. Since the proposed option has been dropped and the problem is no longer relevant, I close the bug.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web