Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1018590 > unrolled thread

Bug#965355: transition: ace

Started bySudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
First post2020-07-20 10:40 +0200
Last post2020-08-01 16:40 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist


Contents

  Bug#965355: transition: ace Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2020-07-20 10:40 +0200
    Bug#965355: transition: ace Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2020-07-20 14:00 +0200
    Bug#965355: transition: ace Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2020-07-25 01:30 +0200
      Bug#965355: transition: ace Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2020-08-01 16:40 +0200

#1018590 — Bug#965355: transition: ace

FromSudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Date2020-07-20 10:40 +0200
SubjectBug#965355: transition: ace
Message-ID<Auzv3-M2-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

Another transition for 'ace' please.
Small transition with only two affected packages: diagnostics, ivtools.
ivtools builds fine with ace 6.5.10+dfsg-1 version in experimental.
diagnostics already has a FTBFS (#964631) on it and so I could not verify
if there is any impact on it.

The autogenerated ben tracker looks good. Please consider 'ace' for
transition.
Thanks in advance.

--
Regards
Sudip

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1018613

FromSudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Date2020-07-20 14:00 +0200
Message-ID<AuCCC-2Bk-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1018590
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:34:41AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Another transition for 'ace' please.
> Small transition with only two affected packages: diagnostics, ivtools.
> ivtools builds fine with ace 6.5.10+dfsg-1 version in experimental.
> diagnostics already has a FTBFS (#964631) on it and so I could not verify
> if there is any impact on it.

fwiw, I have used a snapshot of '20200706T204334Z' (the last snapshot
where diagnostics built successfully), installed ace/6.5.10+dfsg-1 and
verified diagnostics still builds. Not an idea way to verify, but atleast
now I know that new version of 'ace' will not create any new FTBFS with
diagnostics.

--
Regards
Sudip

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1019203

FromSudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Date2020-07-25 01:30 +0200
Message-ID<Awfix-52L-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1018590
Just an update:
'diagnostics' now builds fine with new binutils/2.35-1 and the RC bug
has been closed. I have also tested it with ace 6.5.10+dfsg-1 version
in experimental and it builds properly with that.


-- 
Regards
Sudip

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1020062

FromSebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
Date2020-08-01 16:40 +0200
Message-ID<Az0Q2-PT-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1019203

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ace.html

On 2020-07-25 00:15:55 +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Just an update:
> 'diagnostics' now builds fine with new binutils/2.35-1 and the RC bug
> has been closed. I have also tested it with ace 6.5.10+dfsg-1 version
> in experimental and it builds properly with that.

Good, so let's do this one. Please go ahead with the upload to unstable.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist


csiph-web