Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1015922 > unrolled thread

Bug#937090: mrtrix: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Bug#937090: mrtrix: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2020-06-30 20:20 +0200
    Bug#937090: mrtrix: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2020-07-10 13:10 +0200
      Bug#937090: mrtrix: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2020-07-26 13:30 +0200
        Bug#937090: mrtrix: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Michael Hanke <mih@debian.org> - 2020-07-26 18:10 +0200
        Bug#937090: mrtrix: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com> - 2020-07-26 21:20 +0200
          Bug#937090: mrtrix: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2020-07-26 22:10 +0200

#1015922 — Bug#937090: mrtrix: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:27:24AM +0000, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:mrtrix
> Version: 0.2.13-2
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid bullseye
> User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: py2removal
> 
> Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
> Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html

Given that there's a separate mrtrix3 source package which is ported to
Python 3, should src:mrtrix simply be removed now?

Cheers,
        Moritz
	

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1017385

Hi Moritz,

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 08:14:15PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> 
> Given that there's a separate mrtrix3 source package which is ported to
> Python 3, should src:mrtrix simply be removed now?

I wished Michael or Yaroslav would answer this question.  I'm just
helping to maintain this package and do not have the slightest interest
in it - may be the interest to see it go to have less work ...

Kind regards

         Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1019340

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 01:07:27PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Moritz,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 08:14:15PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > 
> > Given that there's a separate mrtrix3 source package which is ported to
> > Python 3, should src:mrtrix simply be removed now?
> 
> I wished Michael or Yaroslav would answer this question.  I'm just
> helping to maintain this package and do not have the slightest interest
> in it - may be the interest to see it go to have less work ...

Michael, Yaroslow, what do you think?

Cheers,
        Moritz

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1019361

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi,

On Sun, Jul 26, 2020, 13:20 Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 01:07:27PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi Moritz,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 08:14:15PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > >
> > > Given that there's a separate mrtrix3 source package which is ported to
> > > Python 3, should src:mrtrix simply be removed now?
> >
> > I wished Michael or Yaroslav would answer this question.  I'm just
> > helping to maintain this package and do not have the slightest interest
> > in it - may be the interest to see it go to have less work ...
>
> Michael, Yaroslow, what do you think?


Thanks Andreas and Moritz for all your work! I agree that removing this
source package is the the best way forward.

Best,

Michael

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1019385

Sorry about delay. Yes, mrtrix3 is Afaik the way to go. Please file RM

On July 26, 2020 7:20:03 AM EDT, "Moritz Mühlenhoff" <jmm@inutil.org> wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 01:07:27PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Hi Moritz,
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 08:14:15PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>> > 
>> > Given that there's a separate mrtrix3 source package which is
>ported to
>> > Python 3, should src:mrtrix simply be removed now?
>> 
>> I wished Michael or Yaroslav would answer this question.  I'm just
>> helping to maintain this package and do not have the slightest
>interest
>> in it - may be the interest to see it go to have less work ...
>
>Michael, Yaroslow, what do you think?
>
>Cheers,
>        Moritz

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1019397

On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 03:07:35PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Sorry about delay. Yes, mrtrix3 is Afaik the way to go. Please file RM

Ack, I've just filed an RM bug.

Cheers,
        Moritz

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist

csiph-web