Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1019372 > unrolled thread

Bug#823185: fixed in bmake 20200710-1

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Bug#823185: fixed in bmake 20200710-1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-07-26 18:50 +0200
    Bug#823185: fixed in bmake 20200710-1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-07-26 19:40 +0200
    Bug#823185: fixed in bmake 20200710-1 "Andrej Shadura" <andrewsh@debian.org> - 2020-07-26 19:40 +0200
    Bug#823185: fixed in bmake 20200710-1 "Andrej Shadura" <andrewsh@debian.org> - 2020-07-26 21:10 +0200
      Bug#823185: fixed in bmake 20200710-1 Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2020-07-26 22:20 +0200

#1019372 — Bug#823185: fixed in bmake 20200710-1

On Fri, 24 Jul 2020, Debian FTP Masters wrote:

>    * Ship bmake mk files (Closes: #823185).

Thanks for breaking bmake’s r-builddeps without notice.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
Yes, I hate users and I want them to suffer.
	-- Marco d'Itri on gmane.linux.debian.devel.general

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1019377

Hi,

> Can you please provide more details?

basically, the bmake mk files don’t even remotely contain
anything usable. Adding -m /usr/share/bmake/mk-netbsd fixes
this in bullseye/sid with a versioned B-D on the new bmake.
It is not the first time {p⇒b}make’s deficiencies troubled
makefs, though…

Anyway the new makefs was ACCEPTED so…

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
15:41⎜<Lo-lan-do:#fusionforge> Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1019378

Hi,

On Sun, 26 Jul 2020, at 18:45, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2020, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> 
> >    * Ship bmake mk files (Closes: #823185).
> 
> Thanks for breaking bmake’s r-builddeps without notice.

Well, I did test bmake with some rbuilddeps and found no regressions; sorry if it didn't work for you. I didn't expect big fallout; if I did, I would have organised a proper transition.

Can you please provide more details?

-- 
Cheers,
  Andrej

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1019383

Control: found -1 20200710-4

I have uploaded a new version with /usr/share/mk being the NetBSD files:

 * /usr/share/bmake/mk-netbsd ships NetBSD files
 * /usr/share/bmake/mk-bmake ships bmake files
 * /usr/share/mk is a symlink to bmake/mk-netbsd

-- 
Cheers,
  Andrej

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1019399

On Sun, 26 Jul 2020, Andrej Shadura wrote:

>> basically, the bmake mk files don’t even remotely contain
>> anything usable.
>
>Any more details please? :)

There’s no bsd.*.mk there, so it’s ?make, not bmake, assuming
b stands for BSD…

> I have uploaded a new version with /usr/share/mk being the NetBSD files:
>
>  * /usr/share/bmake/mk-netbsd ships NetBSD files
>  * /usr/share/bmake/mk-bmake ships bmake files
>  * /usr/share/mk is a symlink to bmake/mk-netbsd

OK. We already changed this in makefs to use /usr/share/bmake/mk-netbsd
so this isn’t affected any more, but others like csh might also need to
use <bsd.prog.mk> and friends. (In fact, these are the reason why users
install bmake…)

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
«MyISAM tables -will- get corrupted eventually. This is a fact of life. »
“mysql is about as much database as ms access” – “MSSQL at least descends
from a database” “it's a rebranded SyBase” “MySQL however was born from a
flatfile and went downhill from there” – “at least jetDB doesn’t claim to
be a database”	(#nosec)    ‣‣‣ Please let MySQL and MariaDB finally die!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist

csiph-web