Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #771424

Bug#836583: "reportbug xrdp" fails

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.unit0.net!news.panservice.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Christian Pernegger <pernegger@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Bug#836583: "reportbug xrdp" fails
Date Mon, 03 Oct 2016 19:20:02 +0200
Message-ID <sof4e-7Py-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sdC49-2cW-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sod2q-6xN-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Mon Oct 3 17:15:13 2016
Old-Return-Path <debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
X-Spam-Flag NO
X-Spam-Score -3.985
Reply-To Christian Pernegger <pernegger@gmail.com>, 836583@bugs.debian.org
Resent-To debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc Dominik George <nik@naturalnet.de>
X-Debian-Pr-Message followup 836583
X-Debian-Pr-Package xrdp
X-Debian-Pr-Keywords moreinfo
X-Debian-Pr-Source xrdp
X-Spam-Bayes score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 31; hammy, 150; neutral, 113; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--python27, 0.000-+--python2.7, 0.000-+--HX-Google-DKIM-Signature:in-reply-to, 0.000-+--traceback, 0.000-+--UD:orig
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lce4mI3RuSy3PsTtErxujOvxAKBmZQ961zJopICg8Yk=; b=0NAmVfKNdhoo74H60wpNq8F9gF4cYSW+rX9GgtcKzgdMfXWouGojA3JMw5A/KxT7RS la8ubev8IPZP5lHJ5xJ8UkR8d7M34N9Hb1Q235fDBf6OO35xuPr0NhP8xlZgggpDGaUw nuPbW9v5PVEnU1B3G9R57p9vqg++UYBpIzkp6dFMa35AkiXUWQKSucACrgRrm6dwVVcm 2sgDsjjocWlnSHCQ/PkZ7Yk4m7Fx1+JhFSBBCCVdX1Y7t6dPsErNPa4PCWMREd/AFCXg Vd6jkHjhbZEitHoyyRPEvTe/qWSJq2InbLhugv634nrYKKwCu/NLzTWuBmVALyQ40NPE cldw==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lce4mI3RuSy3PsTtErxujOvxAKBmZQ961zJopICg8Yk=; b=ijDKbWhJXSklrcQYsJESAGGFDoySD+NcZicHsyiu4S477DthrixxVC9SFHRVQ+a9mc WvaC/sYMktP6370FOdlwuwyWWfrkNbSvuOl7segnX2HHChnUxoDjtPn4Mk2BtlTZFJ/G El74cSWnpMIVf/gXly2MANEJpHrPegxzauaVcMa6RAlfNVpsxhGDZZJXKvmV7In2RzqK VY/0w3lbx6p11zwh4vm2XXNTABsuq67qdA6e3NuGCPzgPMUpEwIh9WSauyZ/0Fbz9vyZ 9ZURHFYbclQ0hfTGv02a/siYOJC64cty+QT9AsjoBuEritNpohkOXCJrAqBdpFHbCHCZ TfjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State AA6/9Rk+ttz/nRTxchmEYBsjEPYFI8aWymkVnnAxJscIFALkoTA21vfiNZEOHiFu33U/bIiBmWcZMTaZLaPueQ==
X-Received by 10.194.97.69 with SMTP id dy5mr3047290wjb.53.1475514786544; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 10:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Debian-Message from BTS
X-Mailing-List <debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1312926
List-ID <debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist/>
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 57
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Mon, 3 Oct 2016 19:12:26 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <CAKbQEqG9O5-n7erqe5cpyjsnQQodsZcUqci8+g=32Jn9JJVS+w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <CAKbQEqHCmM1UmapabTsyszhSGYm+mUvWE+bKgW-ABbWww=y2-g@mail.gmail.com> <20161003145658.yvtpy7mfvjxlswy3@portux.lan.naturalnet.de>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:771424

Show key headers only | View raw


Hello,

since, in my experience, trying stuff on a fresh sid install has never
fixed anything, I dug a little deeper. Turns out the xrdp upgrade (0.6
branch --> 0.9 branch) had left a conffile mess in /etc/pam.d:
sesman.orig
xrdp-sesman -> sesman [dangling symlink]
xrdp-sesman.dpkg-new

Removing all three and purging-installing xrdp left me with just
xrdp-sesman [plain file] there -- and a working reportbug!

I'd have expected either the purge of 0.6.1 or the one of 0.9.0 to get
rid of such cruft. It didn't, obviously. There wasn't any warning
during install/configure either.

So for me it's fixed, but maybe something can be improved in the
upgrade process?

Also, this had apparently been reported already (against reportbug) as
#826534. Sorry for the dupe. I'll drop a note there but leave it to
you whether to reassign and merge.

Cheers,
C.


2016-10-03 16:57 GMT+02:00 Dominik George <nik@naturalnet.de>:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
>> I just tried unsuccessfully to upgrade from 0.6 to 0.9 and wanted to
>> file a couple of reports, but:
>>
>> […]
>>
>> Getting status for xrdp...
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 2247, in <module>
>>     main()
>>   File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 1115, in main
>>     return iface.user_interface()
>>   File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 1419, in user_interface
>>     status = utils.get_package_status(package)
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/reportbug/utils.py", line
>> 387, in get_package_status
>>     conffiles = conffiles + [re.findall(r' (.+) ([0-9a-f]+).*$', line)[0]]
>> IndexError: list index out of range
>
> I just installed xrdp on a fresh sid installation, ran reportbug, and it
> worked just fine.
>
> Please try to reproduce the bug on a fresh sid install and reply with
> how to do it.
>
> Cheers,
> Nik

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#836583: "reportbug xrdp" fails Dominik George <nik@naturalnet.de> - 2016-10-03 17:10 +0200
  Bug#836583: "reportbug xrdp" fails Christian Pernegger <pernegger@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 19:20 +0200

csiph-web