Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1270788
| From | Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.ports.hurd |
| Subject | Bug#1120984: sbuild: uninstallable on hurd-any |
| Date | 2025-11-19 13:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <LSPkd-e7Ww-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <LSJHP-e4c3-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <LSILL-e3uK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LSORb-e7uG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <LSILL-e3uK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LSORb-e7uG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | The Debian Project |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi Luke, * Luke Yasuda <jing@jing.rocks> [2025-11-19 20:40]: >>meaningless. Using "iproute | hurd" would be better, no? >> >>What do you think? > >I think reverting that commit should be the best solution. Making >sbuild arch:any looks very ugly to me...and I don't think it makes >sense for iproute2 to stay in Depends, because sbuild can still use >schroot, and unlike unshare, schroot works everywhere. Would there be any problem with iproute2 | hurd as josch suggested? I would prefer that over reverting. Cheers Jochen
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1120984: sbuild: uninstallable on hurd-any Luke Yasuda <jing@jing.rocks> - 2025-11-19 06:20 +0100
Bug#1120984: sbuild: uninstallable on hurd-any Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org> - 2025-11-19 07:20 +0100
Bug#1120984: sbuild: uninstallable on hurd-any Luke Yasuda <jing@jing.rocks> - 2025-11-19 12:50 +0100
Bug#1120984: sbuild: uninstallable on hurd-any Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org> - 2025-11-19 13:20 +0100
Bug#1120984: sbuild: uninstallable on hurd-any Luke Yasuda <jing@jing.rocks> - 2025-11-20 04:20 +0100
csiph-web