Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1270780

Bug#1120975: Please let r-base migrate by removing blocking packages

From Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.release
Subject Bug#1120975: Please let r-base migrate by removing blocking packages
Date 2025-11-19 12:50 +0100
Message-ID <LSORb-e7uG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <LSERP-e0PQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <LSERP-e0PQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LSERP-e0PQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Charles

On Wed, 19 Nov 2025 at 00:09, Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> wrote:
> The r-base package maintained by Dirk is blocked from testing migration by
> three to six r-cran-* packages maintained by us (Debian R Packages Mainainers
> team).  The issue is problematic autopktests on i386, which is not supported
> upstream.
>
>     https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-base
>
> Can you let r-base migrate by removing them from Testing?
>
> urgent r-base/4.5.2-1
> remove r-cran-bayestestr/0.15.2-1
> remove r-cran-bit64/4.6.0-1-4
> remove r-cran-blme/1.0-6-1
> remove r-cran-freetypeharfbuzz/0.2.6+dfsg-3
> remove r-cran-grimport2/0.3-3-1
> remove r-cran-projpred/2.8.0+dfsg-1

I didn't find any RC bugs filed against any of these packages that
would prevent them from migrating straight back to testing after
removal.

Looking at the excuses page you linked to above, only r-cran-bit64,
r-cran-freetypeharfbuzz and r-cran-grimport are blocking the migration
of r-base, the remainder have "failure will be ignored".

I have filed bugs for r-cran-bit64 [1], r-cran-freetypeharfbuzz [2]
and r-cran-grimport [3].

I have added removal hints for r-cran-freetypeharfbuzz and r-cran-grimport.

> If that removes more packages from the Debian R Packages Maintainers team, the
> Debian Med team or the Debian Science team, that is fine; we are planning to
> remove these packages from from i386 anyway, by build-depending on
> architecture-is-64-bit in a later upload.

That cannot remove more packages.  The reverse-dependencies of
cran-bit64 would need to be calculated and manually removed.

In the meantime, I've added a hint to allow r-base to migrate
regardless.  We can allow r-cran-bit64 to regress on i386 and it now
has an RC bug filed against it.  I don't think any further action is
required here, but I'll confirm that r-base has migrated before
closing.

Regards
Graham

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1120994
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1120995
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1120997

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1120975: Please let r-base migrate by removing blocking packages Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> - 2025-11-19 02:10 +0100
  Bug#1120975: Please let r-base migrate by removing blocking packages Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2025-11-19 12:50 +0100
    Bug#1120975: Please let r-base migrate by removing blocking packages Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> - 2025-11-19 13:10 +0100
      Bug#1120975: Please let r-base migrate by removing blocking packages Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2025-11-19 15:20 +0100
        Bug#1120975: Please let r-base migrate by removing blocking packages Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2025-11-19 16:00 +0100
          Bug#1120975: Please let r-base migrate by removing blocking packages Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> - 2025-11-19 18:00 +0100

csiph-web