Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1264434
| From | Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.policy |
| Subject | Bug#1110017: debian-policy: Priority should no longer be `recommended` |
| Date | 2025-10-02 20:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <LBwdX-2fDF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <Lw4im-g6rl-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <LdvVL-3ovR-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <LBsN4-2daW-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <LdvVL-3ovR-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <LBsN4-2daW-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hello, On Thu 02 Oct 2025 at 04:38pm +02, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, 2025-09-17 at 23:06:29 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: >> diff --git a/policy/ch-archive.rst b/policy/ch-archive.rst >> index 302dc8d..3bf5abf 100644 >> --- a/policy/ch-archive.rst >> +++ b/policy/ch-archive.rst >> @@ -376,11 +376,14 @@ Priorities >> ---------- >> >> Each package must have a *priority* value, which is set in the metadata >> -for the Debian archive and is also included in the package's control >> -files (see :ref:`s-f-Priority`). This information is used >> +for the Debian archive and is also included in the package's binary >> +control files (see :ref:`s-f-Priority`). This information is used >> to control which packages are included in standard or minimal Debian >> installations. >> >> +If the *Priority* field is not specified in the source control file, dpkg >> +sets it to ``optional`` by default starting version 1.22.13. > > After the control file nomenclature unification, "source control file" > should always refer to a «.dsc», in this case I think you mean > "source package template control file". > > Also, not sure whether to make it explicit as in "not specified in any > of the stanzas" but perhaps that's unnecessary. Thank you for these comments, Guillem. Nilesh, would you be able to revise your patch? Thanks. -- Sean Whitton
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1110017: debian-policy: Priority should no longer be `recommended` Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org> - 2025-09-17 19:40 +0200
Bug#1110017: debian-policy: Priority should no longer be `recommended` Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2025-10-02 13:50 +0200
Bug#1110017: debian-policy: Priority should no longer be `recommended` Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2025-10-02 15:00 +0200
Bug#1110017: debian-policy: Priority should no longer be `recommended` Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2025-10-02 16:50 +0200
Bug#1110017: debian-policy: Priority should no longer be `recommended` Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2025-10-02 20:30 +0200
Bug#1110017: debian-policy: Priority should no longer be `recommended` Nilesh Patra <nilesh@riseup.net> - 2025-10-02 23:10 +0200
Bug#1110017: debian-policy: Priority should no longer be `recommended` Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2025-10-03 05:20 +0200
Bug#1110017: debian-policy: Priority should no longer be `recommended` Nilesh Patra <nilesh@riseup.net> - 2025-10-03 16:50 +0200
Bug#1110017: debian-policy: Priority should no longer be `recommended` Nilesh Patra <nilesh@riseup.net> - 2025-10-03 16:50 +0200
Bug#1110017: debian-policy: Priority should no longer be `recommended` Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2025-10-04 15:20 +0200
Bug#1110017: debian-policy: Priority should no longer be `recommended` Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2025-10-06 14:50 +0200
Bug#1110017: debian-policy: Priority should no longer be `recommended` Nilesh Patra <nilesh@riseup.net> - 2025-10-02 23:10 +0200
Bug#1110017: debian-policy: Priority should no longer be `recommended` Nilesh Patra <nilesh@riseup.net> - 2025-10-02 23:20 +0200
csiph-web