Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1253134

Bug#1078640: puma: will FTBFS during trixie support period

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject	Bug#1078640: puma: will FTBFS during trixie support period
Date	Fri, 18 Jul 2025 11:40:01 +0200
Message-ID	<L9PJn-Rqu-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<L9fcR-tHF-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <L9kvT-xbA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Jb4hK-4MGs-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <L9kvT-xbA-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Lucas Kanashiro <kanashiro@riseup.net>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Fri Jul 18 09:31:08 2025
Old-Return-Path	<debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
X-Spam-Flag	NO
X-Spam-Score	-3.999
Reply-To	Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org>, 1078640@bugs.debian.org
Resent-To	debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc	Debian Ruby Team <pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
X-Debian-Pr-Message	followup 1078640
X-Debian-Pr-Package	src:puma
X-Debian-Pr-Keywords	ftbfs patch
X-Debian-Pr-Source	puma
Organization	The Debian Project
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ovmelrh3k2qijxco"
Content-Disposition	inline
X-Debian-User	roehling
X-Debian-Message	from BTS
X-Mailing-List	<debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1914197
List-ID	<debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist/>
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	73
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	1078640@bugs.debian.org, "Praveen Arimbrathodiyil (Pirate)" <praveen@debian.org>
X-Original-Date	Fri, 18 Jul 2025 11:28:44 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<b6dadc3f-50c7-4d7c-96fd-f2309a224fd7@mail.gaussglocke.de>
X-Original-References	<90f7c6e1-e64f-4a4e-9be8-4522c4ea2e42@mail.gaussglocke.de> <8E1C796A-F8AB-4F90-A898-3BEFEED5EFCB@riseup.net> <eb7134d5-c77f-40fd-82f3-7ba81828a98c@debian.org> <8E1C796A-F8AB-4F90-A898-3BEFEED5EFCB@riseup.net>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1253134

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi,

* Lucas Kanashiro <kanashiro@riseup.net> [2025-07-17 02:13]:
>I am not sure if we want to add Java runtime as dependency here. I 
>discussed that with Athos Ribeiro and he has a patch just updating the 
>certificates for the period of 5 years (to also cover LTS). This is not 
>the best solution since we will need to renew them every freeze, but it 
>is the best we can get without adding more dependencies.

I have no strong feelings one way or the other. I think it would be best 
to (re-)generate certificates at build time to avoid spurious failures 
when the certificates expire, and I wanted to have the RC bugfix for 
trixie. I marked the additional dependencies with <!nocheck> so it is 
clear they are not actually required for the package build itself. 
Ultimately, I am happy to leave this design decision up to you as the 
maintainer.


Cheers
Timo

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀   ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁   │ Timo Röhling                                       │
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1  23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀   ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1078640: puma: will FTBFS during trixie support period Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2025-07-16 20:40 +0200
  Bug#1078640: puma: will FTBFS during trixie support period Lucas Kanashiro <kanashiro@riseup.net> - 2025-07-17 02:20 +0200
    Bug#1078640: puma: will FTBFS during trixie support period Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2025-07-18 11:40 +0200

csiph-web