Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1242323

Bug#1100539: Is Lintian maintained maintained in a backwards incompatible way? Should stable releases use old Lintian versions?

From	Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject	Bug#1100539: Is Lintian maintained maintained in a backwards incompatible way? Should stable releases use old Lintian versions?
Date	2025-04-16 18:30 +0200
Message-ID	<KCdOb-dYIw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<Kqq4p-69Bq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <KCd1L-dYbt-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <Kqq4p-69Bq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <KCd1L-dYbt-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Thanks for the reply.

This means that in Salsa CI the Lintian job for Bookworm should run Lintian
from Bookworm, rather than the unstable version.

This is not the case now but with this clarification we will change it to
follow your stated maintenance principle.

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1100539: Is Lintian maintained maintained in a backwards incompatible way? Should stable releases use old Lintian versions? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2025-04-16 17:40 +0200
  Bug#1100539: Is Lintian maintained maintained in a backwards incompatible way? Should stable releases use old Lintian versions? Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org> - 2025-04-16 18:30 +0200

csiph-web