Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1241637

Bug#1102724: RM: win32-loader -- RoQA; not considered worthwhile to maintain further

Show all headers | View raw

Hi,

Am 12. April 2025 13:31:11 MESZ schrieb Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>:
>[Added the moreinfo tag as d-i needs adaptation first and because of the following question.]
>
>In bug #1089276 (win32-loader FTBFS) we're discussing the removal of win32-loader from d-i and the archive. As I understand it this package also has BYHAND processing to ensure it ends up at /srv/mirrors/debian/tools/win32-loader. Does this mean we should do more than just removing win32-loader use in d-i and filling of this bug report?

It should be made sure, that the files under /mirror/debian/tools/win32-loader
remain until bookworm is EOL.

And keep the package in bookworm, until that's EOL.


Holger



-- 
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1102724: RM: win32-loader -- RoQA; not considered worthwhile to maintain further Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2025-04-12 13:40 +0200
  Bug#1102724: RM: win32-loader -- RoQA; not considered worthwhile to maintain further Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> - 2025-04-12 15:00 +0200
  Bug#1102724: RM: win32-loader "Andrea Pappacoda" <tachi@debian.org> - 2025-05-19 09:50 +0200
    Bug#1102724: RM: win32-loader Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2025-05-19 18:40 +0200
      Bug#1102724: RM: win32-loader Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> - 2025-05-19 19:10 +0200
        Bug#1102724: RM: win32-loader Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> - 2025-05-19 19:10 +0200

csiph-web