Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1214265
| From | Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#1082616: autopkgtests: Documentation clarification/improvements |
| Date | 2024-09-25 22:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <JqGl3-eNB3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <JqGl3-eNB3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <JqGl3-eNB3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <JqGl3-eNB3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi Niels, Some quick answers. On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 13:31:05 +0200 Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> wrote: > I agree with Richard here in the sense that the documentation could be > more explicit on what is "sufficiently powerful" by means of examples. It means that if you have added the isolation-container or isolation-machine restriction and the testbed doesn't provide that, the test will be skipped. Re: @recommends > I have to agree with Richard here. A binary package (.deb) never > has substitution variables and the text is phrased as if > autopkgtests reads the Recommends from the .deb (or a Packages file, > but that is basically the same as far as substitution variables > go). So what exactly is being stripped here? The text about @recommends@ is right below the text about @builddeps@ and it even explicitly mentions debian/control, so I was hoping it's clear it's debian/control that's being read here. Paul
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1082616: autopkgtests: Documentation clarification/improvements Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2024-09-25 22:00 +0200
csiph-web