Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1223180
| From | Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#1089509: Please reconsider building libgsl-prof by default |
| Date | 2024-12-08 07:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <JRiXL-eBYM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <JRil3-eBi3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JRil3-eBi3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 8 December 2024 at 07:44, Adrian Bunk wrote: | Source: gsl | Version: 2.8+dfsg-5 | Severity: minor | | Looking at #503290, "it bloats the archive" was the only | argument against building libgsl-prof by default. | | I remember how there was a minor issue on the Debian mirrors | several years ago when we had the first file > 2 GB in the | archive (an .orig.tar). libgsl-prof is 4 MB. | | It would be both more convenient for users and easier to maintain | if libgsl-prof just gets built by default. | | (I was affected by the latter with the 2.6+dfsg-2+deb11u1 LTS upload, | which originally hit NEW and needed a backport of pkg.gsl.prof to | avoid NEW.) I think I fought that to no avail in the past. If you think you can make it work, and can prepare a PR I would really appreciate it. Thanks also for propagating that old CVE to stable. Dirk -- dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1089509: Please reconsider building libgsl-prof by default Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2024-12-08 06:50 +0100 Bug#1089509: Please reconsider building libgsl-prof by default Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> - 2024-12-08 07:30 +0100
csiph-web