Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1223180

Bug#1089509: Please reconsider building libgsl-prof by default

From Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Bug#1089509: Please reconsider building libgsl-prof by default
Date 2024-12-08 07:30 +0100
Message-ID <JRiXL-eBYM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <JRil3-eBi3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JRil3-eBi3-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 8 December 2024 at 07:44, Adrian Bunk wrote:
| Source: gsl
| Version: 2.8+dfsg-5
| Severity: minor
| 
| Looking at #503290, "it bloats the archive" was the only
| argument against building libgsl-prof by default.
| 
| I remember how there was a minor issue on the Debian mirrors
| several years ago when we had the first file > 2 GB in the
| archive (an .orig.tar). libgsl-prof is 4 MB.
| 
| It would be both more convenient for users and easier to maintain
| if libgsl-prof just gets built by default.
| 
| (I was affected by the latter with the 2.6+dfsg-2+deb11u1 LTS upload,
|  which originally hit NEW and needed a backport of pkg.gsl.prof to
|  avoid NEW.)

I think I fought that to no avail in the past. If you think you can make it
work, and can prepare a PR I would really appreciate it.

Thanks also for propagating that old CVE to stable.

Dirk

-- 
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1089509: Please reconsider building libgsl-prof by default Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2024-12-08 06:50 +0100
  Bug#1089509: Please reconsider building libgsl-prof by default Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> - 2024-12-08 07:30 +0100

csiph-web