Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1193479

Bug#1068543: [Pkg-swan-devel] Bug#1068543: strongswan: isolation-machine autopkgtest fails: starter IS NOT RUNNING

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Yves-Alexis,

On 08-04-2024 10:13 a.m., Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> thanks for the report. I might try to investigate a bit but at that point
> honestly I don't have much clue what happens.

Can we try and find out together?

> Could you please provide a bit more context in the bug report so we have a bit
> more data?

What kind of context are you looking for? Your package has an 
autopkgtest (which I assume was added such that it can run). It declares 
a isolation-machine restriction, so until yesterday, the test was never 
executed on ci.debian.net. I just realized that I could have looked at 
Ubuntu too, which uses qemu already longer. The test passes there, so 
we're looking for delta's.

> Because at that point I didn't really ask for anything and you're
> making your problem my problem, which doesn't feel really fair, to be honest.

It makes me sad that you see it like that. I had the impression I was 
running ci.d.n as a service to Debian maintainers.

> And if enabling isolation-machine breaks the test, then maybe isolation-
> machine needs to be fixed, or just not enabled?

Enabling isolation-machine doesn't break tests. It enables more tests to 
run and the test that previously didn't run now fails. Now I think we 
should be interested to learn why (personally even more so because it 
passes on Ubuntu's infrastructure [1]). Honestly, looking at the log it 
appeared to me that the test was never tried and you simple had 
forgotten to start the daemon, but given it works in Ubuntu, might this 
be a race condition?

> I cant say for sure but it
> looks like the easiest way for me.

If you don't want your isolation-machine restricted tests to run, I can 
trivially disable it again. I was rather hoping to fix either the test, 
or the setup at ci.d.n or both.

Paul

[1] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/strongswan

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1068543: strongswan: isolation-machine autopkgtest fails: starter IS NOT RUNNING Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2024-04-07 10:50 +0200
  Bug#1068543: [Pkg-swan-devel] Bug#1068543: strongswan: isolation-machine autopkgtest fails: starter IS NOT RUNNING Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> - 2024-04-08 10:20 +0200
    Bug#1068543: [Pkg-swan-devel] Bug#1068543: strongswan: isolation-machine autopkgtest fails: starter IS NOT RUNNING Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2024-04-08 20:50 +0200

csiph-web