Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1188851
| From | Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.maint.gtk.gnome |
| Subject | Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition |
| Date | 2024-03-02 23:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <IdFyF-e04K-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <IdabA-dGFp-47@gated-at.bofh.it> <Idfbb-dJHA-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <IdE9z-dZlO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Id9Iu-dG5x-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IdE9z-dZlO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Sat, 02 Mar 2024 at 20:19:50 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I am currently downloading all versions of libglib2.0-0 that have
> existed on amd64 as tracked by snapshot.d.o. My plan is to extract their
> DEBIAN/postrm, import them into a git branch and go back through the
> history that way.
https://salsa.debian.org/smcv/glib2.0-control-files has the full history.
`git log -p postrm` confirms that the only things the postrm has ever
done in versions known to snapshot.d.o are:
- deleting gschemas.compiled, which is what we want to avoid here;
- deleting giomodule.cache, which is what we want to avoid here;
- running ldconfig, which is handled by triggers now
So I think removing the postrm is viable.
smcv
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2024-03-01 13:00 +0100
Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> - 2024-03-01 13:30 +0100
Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2024-03-01 16:10 +0100
Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2024-03-01 16:50 +0100
Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2024-03-01 17:20 +0100
Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2024-03-01 18:50 +0100
Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2024-03-02 21:30 +0100
Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2024-03-02 23:10 +0100
Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2024-03-03 03:10 +0100
Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2024-03-06 13:10 +0100
Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> - 2024-03-04 01:00 +0100
Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 17:00 +0100
Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2024-03-04 17:20 +0100
Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> - 2024-03-04 17:50 +0100
csiph-web