Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1148844
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.policy |
| Subject | Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var |
| Date | Tue, 06 Jun 2023 14:10:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <GDDFD-e3dY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <F7g6R-8xvh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <z5caR-7gO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GtjId-7zCt-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <GCTW9-dATy-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <z5caR-7gO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GCTW9-dATy-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <z5caR-7gO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GCWAF-dCFN-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <GDCJz-e2F5-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <GDCJz-e2F5-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <z5caR-7gO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GDCJz-e2F5-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | 945269@bugs.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jun 6 12:09:09 2023 |
| Old-Return-Path | <debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org> |
| X-Spam-Flag | NO |
| X-Spam-Score | -4.21 |
| Reply-To | Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>, 945269@bugs.debian.org |
| Resent-To | debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org |
| Resent-Cc | Debian Policy Editors <debian-policy@lists.debian.org> |
| X-Debian-Pr-Message | followup 945269 |
| X-Debian-Pr-Package | debian-policy |
| X-Debian-Pr-Source | debian-policy |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AC+VfDzJ80c4Splo8jwewcFBXII5TseQhjZoVsNxM00u9RDHMuhz417B jrDPskNQM8fIKx4ryoXudyCnTotE3nRzZg== |
| X-Google-SMTP-Source | ACHHUZ7Y9cmGR/xHOwq3cF/brEMPNAzSN2+GJY/b89ll2f2Zt9WTV6TulHGfY2mONmDwmgs2rAdOpQ== |
| X-Received | by 2002:adf:f14f:0:b0:30a:eb3f:509f with SMTP id y15-20020adff14f000000b0030aeb3f509fmr1518644wro.60.1686053263697; Tue, 06 Jun 2023 05:07:43 -0700 (PDT) |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uZiNtZHrBQIGKV7LInbY" |
| User-Agent | Evolution 3.38.3-1+plugin |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Debian-Message | from BTS |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1773911 |
| List-ID | <debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist/> |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 122 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Tue, 06 Jun 2023 13:07:37 +0100 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <bdbf9581ee3ed65155ad44a3c9ec8c2901c4ac45.camel@debian.org> |
| X-Original-References | <87czbsqavc.fsf@hope.eyrie.org> <8736egibhq.fsf@43-1.org> <4264e53cb2569be6f5539b9d16cfd33dc43ea205.camel@debian.org> <87wn0jtrqw.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <8736egibhq.fsf@43-1.org> <CAMw=ZnRXpAtvLpPq5TqUKMXOP2GTSxJe9JUji1PSuKkhxQ42KA@mail.gmail.com> <8736egibhq.fsf@43-1.org> <ZHyYK1h51nFlLUfJ@tautology.pseudorandom.co.uk> <877csgho5c.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <ZH8RPwb73hAp/EuU@tautology.pseudorandom.co.uk> <8736egibhq.fsf@43-1.org> <ZH8RPwb73hAp/EuU@tautology.pseudorandom.co.uk> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1148844 linux.debian.policy:8246 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 11:58:07 +0100 Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 at 11:37:51 +0100, Sean Whitton wrote: > > On Sun 04 Jun 2023 at 02:56PM +01, Simon McVittie wrote: > > > Another possible mitigation which I haven't previously seen proposed > > > is giving *elogind* a Depends or Recommends on systemd-*- standalone. > > > I think that would work to mitigate the failure mode with (1.) and (B.), > > > and the installed-size argument seems less interesting here because the > > > sort of systems that require elogind are already much larger anyway. > > > Would the elogind maintainers be willing to consider this? Does anyone > > > see a reason why it wouldn't work? > > > > So to confirm, you think that if the elogind maintainers did this, then > > default-systemd-tmpfiles could point at systemd rather than > > systemd-standalone-tmpfiles, which the systemd maintainers prefer, but > > in addition, there aren't any scenarios in which people's systems are > > likely to be re-arranged when they don't want them to be? > > Exactly. My hope is that if we had: > > Package: systemd > Architecture: linux-any > Provides: default-systemd-tmpfiles, systemd-tmpfiles > Conflicts: systemd-tmpfiles > Replaces: systemd-tmpfiles > > Package: systemd-standalone-tmpfiles > Architecture: linux-any > Provides: systemd-tmpfiles > Conflicts: systemd-tmpfiles > Replaces: systemd-tmpfiles > > Package: elogind > Depends: systemd-standalone-tmpfiles # or Recommends? > > Package: foo-service # any package that requires tmpfiles.d(5) > Depends: default-systemd-tmpfiles | systemd-tmpfiles > > # optionally, if someone does the work > Package: openrc-tmpfiles # any other implementation > Architecture: hurd-any kfreebsd-any > Provides: default-systemd-tmpfiles, systemd-tmpfiles > Conflicts: systemd-tmpfiles > Replaces: systemd-tmpfiles > > then the right thing (or at least *a* right thing) would happen in > all cases: > > * install foo-service on a systemd-booted system: > systemd is already installed and the dependency is satisfied > > * install foo-service on a sysvinit-booted desktop system with elogind: > elogind is already installed, therefore systemd-standalone-tmpfiles is > already installed and the dependency is satisfied, avoiding #1016006 etc. > > * install foo-service on a sysvinit-booted headless system with no elogind: > systemd gets installed as a dependency by default, which is what the > systemd maintainers would prefer to happen when there are no compelling > space constraints; but the user can specifically ask for > systemd-standalone-tmpfiles if that's what they'd prefer > > * install foo-service in a container with no init system at all: Sounds like a good plan to me. -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2023-06-04 13:20 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-04 16:10 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2023-06-05 02:40 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-05 11:00 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2023-06-05 13:20 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-06-13 17:50 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-06-13 18:20 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> - 2023-06-13 18:20 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2023-06-13 18:40 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2023-06-13 19:50 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2023-06-13 20:10 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2023-06-13 18:40 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-06-13 20:20 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2023-06-13 21:00 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-06-13 21:10 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2023-06-13 21:30 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> - 2023-06-13 23:20 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-05 11:20 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2023-06-05 13:20 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2023-06-05 14:20 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-06 13:10 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2023-06-06 14:10 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2023-06-07 05:50 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-07 12:40 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2023-06-07 13:00 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2023-06-07 12:40 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk> - 2023-06-13 15:10 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.org.uk> - 2023-06-13 19:10 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2023-06-13 20:00 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2023-06-13 21:50 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2023-06-13 22:00 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2023-06-13 22:10 +0200
Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2023-06-13 22:30 +0200
csiph-web