Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1077860
| From | Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.mentors |
| Subject | Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator |
| Date | 2021-10-24 16:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <DbMYW-2ys-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <Db13Y-6PB-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <DbLq9-1Ll-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Db13Y-6PB-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <DbLq9-1Ll-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hello Feri, Thank you for your advice. > The upstream version number should be 0.7.0~rc2 with a tilde instead of > a hyphen to ensure proper ordering (as Lintian warns about). To do such > transformations automatically, put something like this in the watch file: > > uversionmangle=s/(\d)[_\.\-\+]?((RC|rc|pre|dev|beta|alpha)\d*)$/$1~$2/ > I will update the watch file following your advice soon. > > swtpm - Libtpms-based TPM emulator > > swtpm-dev - Include files for the TPM emulator's CUSE interface > > swtpm-libs - Common libraries for TPM emulators > > Why do you deviate from the usual libswtpm-dev/libswtpm0 package names? > Including the SO version in the package name enables installing > incompatible versions side-by-side, which is useful. > > Also, shipping static libraries (like libswtpm_libtpms.a) is generally > recommended against in Debian. Does this package warrant it? The upstream version already has some debian-related files, and I changed them to adopt the package. The author of it wants to name it like libswtpm0, so I used the name. The static libraries are also involved in upstream debian files. Should I change the name like libswtpm instead of libswtpm0 and remove static libraries from the package? > > > swtpm-tools - Tools for the TPM emulator > > Why do you put swtpm-create-tpmca, swtpm-create-user-config-files and > swtpm-localca into /usr/share/swtpm instead of /usr/bin? (This emits > several Lintian information tags.) The author of the upstream project wanted to put them to /usr/share/swtpm. The files are just for the initialization and don't be used for TPM operations directly, so maybe he wanted to put /usr/share/swtpm instead of /usr/bin. Should I move them to /usr/bin? Best regards, Seunghun
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com> - 2021-10-22 13:40 +0200
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> - 2021-10-22 23:00 +0200
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com> - 2021-10-23 19:10 +0200
Re: Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator wferi@niif.hu - 2021-10-24 15:20 +0200
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com> - 2021-10-24 16:50 +0200
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator wferi@niif.hu - 2021-10-30 01:40 +0200
Re: Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-10-25 02:30 +0200
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> - 2021-10-28 00:10 +0200
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com> - 2021-10-29 08:40 +0200
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> - 2021-10-29 22:30 +0200
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> - 2021-11-01 10:10 +0100
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com> - 2021-11-01 11:30 +0100
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> - 2021-11-01 17:10 +0100
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com> - 2021-11-02 07:50 +0100
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> - 2021-11-03 22:50 +0100
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com> - 2021-11-04 03:40 +0100
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com> - 2021-11-04 09:40 +0100
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> - 2021-11-06 22:10 +0100
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Matthew Fernandez <matthew.fernandez@gmail.com> - 2021-11-04 16:00 +0100
Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator howtolinux <howtolinux@protonmail.com> - 2021-11-04 12:40 +0100
csiph-web