Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1077860

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

From Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.mentors
Subject Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator
Date 2021-10-24 16:50 +0200
Message-ID <DbMYW-2ys-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <Db13Y-6PB-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <DbLq9-1Ll-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Db13Y-6PB-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <DbLq9-1Ll-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Hello Feri,

Thank you for your advice.

> The upstream version number should be 0.7.0~rc2 with a tilde instead of
> a hyphen to ensure proper ordering (as Lintian warns about).  To do such
> transformations automatically, put something like this in the watch file:
>
> uversionmangle=s/(\d)[_\.\-\+]?((RC|rc|pre|dev|beta|alpha)\d*)$/$1~$2/
>
I will update the watch file following your advice soon.

> >   swtpm - Libtpms-based TPM emulator
> >   swtpm-dev - Include files for the TPM emulator's CUSE interface
> >   swtpm-libs - Common libraries for TPM emulators
>
> Why do you deviate from the usual libswtpm-dev/libswtpm0 package names?
> Including the SO version in the package name enables installing
> incompatible versions side-by-side, which is useful.
>
> Also, shipping static libraries (like libswtpm_libtpms.a) is generally
> recommended against in Debian.  Does this package warrant it?

The upstream version already has some debian-related files, and I
changed them to adopt the package. The author of it wants to name it
like libswtpm0, so I used the name. The static libraries are also
involved in upstream debian files. Should I change the name like
libswtpm instead of libswtpm0 and remove static libraries from the
package?

>
> >   swtpm-tools - Tools for the TPM emulator
>
> Why do you put swtpm-create-tpmca, swtpm-create-user-config-files and
> swtpm-localca into /usr/share/swtpm instead of /usr/bin?  (This emits
> several Lintian information tags.)

The author of the upstream project wanted to put them to
/usr/share/swtpm. The files are just for the initialization and don't
be used for TPM operations directly, so maybe he wanted to put
/usr/share/swtpm instead of /usr/bin. Should I move them to /usr/bin?

Best regards,

Seunghun

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com> - 2021-10-22 13:40 +0200
  Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> - 2021-10-22 23:00 +0200
    Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com> - 2021-10-23 19:10 +0200
  Re: Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator wferi@niif.hu - 2021-10-24 15:20 +0200
    Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com> - 2021-10-24 16:50 +0200
      Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator wferi@niif.hu - 2021-10-30 01:40 +0200
    Re: Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM  emulator Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2021-10-25 02:30 +0200
      Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> - 2021-10-28 00:10 +0200
        Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com> - 2021-10-29 08:40 +0200
          Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> - 2021-10-29 22:30 +0200
            Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> - 2021-11-01 10:10 +0100
            Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com> - 2021-11-01 11:30 +0100
              Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> - 2021-11-01 17:10 +0100
                Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com> - 2021-11-02 07:50 +0100
                Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> - 2021-11-03 22:50 +0100
                Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com> - 2021-11-04 03:40 +0100
                Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com> - 2021-11-04 09:40 +0100
                Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> - 2021-11-06 22:10 +0100
                Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator Matthew Fernandez <matthew.fernandez@gmail.com> - 2021-11-04 16:00 +0100
                Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator howtolinux <howtolinux@protonmail.com> - 2021-11-04 12:40 +0100

csiph-web