Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1090318
| From | Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti@canonical.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#1002532: pygments breaks ruby-pygments.rb autopkgtest: UTF-8 != ASCII-8BIT |
| Date | 2022-01-21 12:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DI07v-5IQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <DxCpP-5HA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 18:50:33 +0100 Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 11:19:00AM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > > As the current version we have is from 2017, I bumped the version of > > this package to the latest available version: I updated the patches, > > removed the ones that do not apply anymore, updated the build system > > and dependencies. The result is available in my PPA [2] and fixes the > > issue we encounter here. > > > > Can you consider pulling this? > > Thank you for this!! > > > I had a look at your work, however I couldn't help but notice that: > * the .orig you used looks odd, much larger than what I get from uscan > (despite yours is also using a different compression, so repacked). I used 'git archive' directly, I did not know about uscan (thank you and Graham). > * You did a ton of patch wrangling, including deletion, renaming, > rebasing, etc. which is all fine, except that the way you did it > obscures quite a bit what you did. Why did you drop the numbers from > the patches? Do you have --no-patch-numbers as you gbp-pq default or > something? I changed the patches names since they were different: I fixed that in my coming MR. Thanks for gbp that I did not know neither. > * why requiring gem2deb >=1 ? that's already in bullseye as well in > focal, so why did you feel the need to add the version? (that's also > not in the changelog) I simply copied the debian/ directory from the previous version that I got from pull-lp-source, I did not use git...I'll use git in the future, thanks. > > As such, I went ahead and re-imported the repacked origin I got myself > in git. > Could I ask you to submit a MR on top of it, with at least commits > separating the deletion, refresh and rebasing of patches (and eventual > new ones, I can't tell at a glance if any new patch appeared…) also > separated. > https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-pygments.rb It's on its way :) > > Thank you for your work!! :) Thank you for your remarks (and thanks Graham for his help ;)) Alex > > -- > regards, > Mattia Rizzolo > > GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. > More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : > Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` > Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1002532: pygments breaks ruby-pygments.rb autopkgtest: UTF-8 != ASCII-8BIT Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti@canonical.com> - 2022-01-21 12:20 +0100
csiph-web