Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1069197
| From | Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#993316: systemd: missing /lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.service file |
| Date | 2021-08-31 19:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CSfTQ-6EM-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <CRSud-88F-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CS7Wh-1Kw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CSeO5-61P-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <CRSud-88F-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CSeO5-61P-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi Niels Am 31.08.21 um 18:07 schrieb Niels Thykier: > My thought is that this is not something I want in dh_link - dh_link has > no business second guessing the link values it gets. Since dh_link runs > after dh_installsystemd, then we cannot even rely on dh_installsystemd > to perform a fix up either. Nod. > Which begins to smell like that either people have to update their > dh_links calls/configuration OR we roll back the dh_installsystemd > change to move to /usr. I am not particular fan of either. :-/ > > Nevertheless, I am inclined to do a rollback and then punt on the "/ -> > /usr" migration track for now. I'll see if I can compile a list of possibly affected packages. If the number is low enough, I think updating the symlink manually is probably ok. Regards, Michael
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#993316: systemd: missing /lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.service file Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2021-08-31 11:10 +0200 Bug#993316: systemd: missing /lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.service file Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2021-08-31 19:40 +0200
csiph-web