Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1019227

Bug#966028: buster-pu: package librsvg/2.44.10-2.1+deb10u1

From	"Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.release
Subject	Bug#966028: buster-pu: package librsvg/2.44.10-2.1+deb10u1
Date	2020-07-25 12:10 +0200
Message-ID	<AwphU-2O5-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<Avl6G-4m3-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <Avl6G-4m3-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <AwphU-2O5-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Avl6G-4m3-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <AwphU-2O5-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Hi,

On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 13:26 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 22/07/2020 13:19, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > So I have gone with the minimal backport to 2.44.10 instead (which
> > I've also tested) and it's already uploaded. debdiff attached.
> 
> Attached for real now.

Unfortunately it appears that this FTBFS on ppc64el and s390x, with a
segmentation fault in the tests.

Regards,

Adam

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#966028: buster-pu: package librsvg/2.44.10-2.1+deb10u1 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> - 2020-07-22 13:30 +0200
  Bug#966028: librsvg 2.44.10-2.1+deb10u1 flagged for acceptance Adam D Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2020-07-23 23:10 +0200
  Bug#966028: buster-pu: package librsvg/2.44.10-2.1+deb10u1 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2020-07-25 12:10 +0200

csiph-web