Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1019365

Bug#965124: transition: pcl

From jspricke@debian.org
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.release
Subject Bug#965124: transition: pcl
Date 2020-07-26 18:20 +0200
Message-ID <AwRxv-2Ve-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <AtcTT-7T1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Au4AV-7km-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <AwQrL-2iF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AtcTT-7T1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AwQrL-2iF-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization The Debian Project

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Sebastian,

* Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> [2020-07-26 17:00]:
>On 2020-07-19 01:33:17 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-pcl.html
>> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>>
>> On 2020-07-16 16:10:32 +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
>> > Package: release.debian.org
>> > Severity: normal
>> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>> > Usertags: transition
>> >
>> > Hi Release team,
>> >
>> > I would like to transition pcl to unstable. The Ben file is fine,
>> > ros-perception-pcl compiles against the new version and I will upload a
>> > fixed python-pcl version during the transition.
>>
>> Please go ahead with the upload to unstable.
>
>pcl fails to migrate due to an autopkgtest regression. Could you take a
>look at the test?

I had a look and the problem is that libpcl-conversions-dev and 
libpcl-ros-dev (in ros-perception-pcl) picked up the include path of pcl 
(which changed). But both where rebuild for the transition anyhow so the 
versions in unstable work.

I think the best solution would be to find_package() the include path 
instead of hard coding it but that needs some planning and testing due 
to how the current cmake macros work.

The other option would be to have a versioned dependency on libpcl-dev 
but the same problem could happen for other dependencies of 
libpcl-conversions-dev so I would prefer not to do that.

Could you maybe add a hint so pcl can transition and we gain some time 
to implement a proper solution?

Sorry for the trouble and thanks

Jochen

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#965124: transition: pcl Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org> - 2020-07-16 16:20 +0200
  Bug#965124: transition: pcl Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2020-07-19 01:40 +0200
    Bug#965124: transition: pcl Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2020-07-26 17:10 +0200
      Bug#965124: transition: pcl jspricke@debian.org - 2020-07-26 18:20 +0200

csiph-web