Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1019321

Bug#725484: A way to override blhc false-positives

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 07:41:09PM +0100, nicoo wrote:
> Would it be possible to embed the overrides into the build log itself?

Hello nicoo,

my first approach was that all false-positives should be
handled/fixed in blhc so that nobody can simply "ignore" missing
flags. But this approach doesn't scale.

Please have a look at the attached patch. It permits embedding
the "blhc: ignore-line-regexp: REGEXP" in the build log. All
lines (fully) matching REGEXP are then ignored (just like the
--ignore-line option). What do you think?

Eriberto: Would this also work for the CI issues you mentioned in
#962990?

Regards
Simon
-- 
+ privacy is necessary
+ using gnupg http://gnupg.org
+ public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#725484: A way to override blhc false-positives simon@ruderich.org - 2020-07-26 08:40 +0200
  Bug#725484: A way to override blhc false-positives Eriberto Mota <eriberto@debian.org> - 2020-07-26 17:30 +0200
    Bug#725484: A way to override blhc false-positives Eriberto <eriberto@eriberto.pro.br> - 2020-07-26 22:10 +0200
      Bug#725484: A way to override blhc false-positives simon@ruderich.org - 2020-07-27 08:20 +0200
        Bug#725484: A way to override blhc false-positives Eriberto <eriberto@eriberto.pro.br> - 2020-07-29 03:50 +0200
        Bug#725484: A way to override blhc false-positives Eriberto <eriberto@eriberto.pro.br> - 2020-07-29 04:00 +0200
          Bug#725484: A way to override blhc false-positives simon@ruderich.org - 2020-07-29 08:10 +0200

csiph-web