Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1019124
| From | Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#966183: abseil FTBFS on !amd64/ppc64: missing symbols |
| Date | 2020-07-24 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Aw4Gu-7ag-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Source: abseil Version: 0~20200225.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=abseil&suite=sid ... dh_makeshlibs -a dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file: see diff output below dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols file: see diff output below dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libabsl20200225/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match completely debian/libabsl20200225.symbols ... Symbols files for C++ libraries are a real pain, unless upstream makes only exported symbols visible: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility When the soname of the library encodes the exact upstream version as abseil does, there are exactly zero benefits of using a symbols - every update of abseil will be a library transition in any case.
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#966183: abseil FTBFS on !amd64/ppc64: missing symbols Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2020-07-24 14:10 +0200
csiph-web