Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1027829
| From | Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.release |
| Subject | Bug#971807: buster-pu: package webext-tbsync |
| Date | 2020-10-07 21:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <AXnip-2ey-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <AXmFH-1EH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hello Adam, On Wed, 07 Oct 2020 19:54:41 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:> severity 971807 normal > retitle 971807 buster-pu: package webext-tbsync > user release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > usertags 971807 + pu > thanks > > On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 20:39 +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Version: > > Severity: grave > > Absolutely not. A stable update is generally - and at most - normal > severity. I choose 'grave' because the bugs about the incompatibility are set to grave like #968102. > > Please use standard metadata for p-u bugs, and at the very least > mention the package in the subject if not... > > > Hello, > > > > I prepare an update of webext-tbsync for buster with version > > 2.16.1+deb10u1. > > That would be higher than the version in unstable, so would be > inappropriate. (and appears to be missing a Debian package revision, > but I assume that's simply a typo and you meant 2.16.1-1+deb10u1.) > > You want 2.16.1-0+deb10u1 or 2.16.1-1~deb10u1, with an appropriate > changelog stanza on top of either the current stable package or the > unstable upload, depending on which way you go. yes I will take the right versioning 2.16.1~deb10u1-1. I was irritated with the description in th the developer reference. But now I hope I understand the difference which isn't described there. > > > It is needed to be uploaded to stable-update because of the update > > thunderbird 68 to 78. > > Is the new package compatible with Thunderbird 68 as well? The new package isn't compatible with Thunderbird 68 but only with 78 as described in d/control. That's why it is useful to update to stable-update and not to proposed-update. Since RT updated Thunderbird in buster from version 68.x to 78.x this causes the incompatibility from webext-tbsync with the recent Thunderbird version in Buster. The previous version doesn't work anymore > > > This fixed the incompatibility (#968102). It is now uploaded to > > unstable after being two months in experimental. > > > > I will also fill two further bug reports for DAV-4-TbSync and > > EAS-4-Tbsync which are dependencies of TbSyc > > Please bear the above in mind before doing so. yes I will change the versioning for all three packages. Sorry for the missinterpreting the developer-reference about this. I hope now it is cleare why I prefer an upload to stable > > Regards, > > Adam -- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Debian Developer ## PGP encryption welcome ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#971807: release.debian.org - fixed incompatibility to thunderbird 78 Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2020-10-07 20:50 +0200
Bug#971807: release.debian.org - fixed incompatibility to thunderbird 78 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2020-10-07 21:00 +0200
Bug#971807: buster-pu: package webext-tbsync Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2020-10-07 21:30 +0200
Bug#971807: buster-pu: package webext-tbsync "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2020-10-07 22:00 +0200
Bug#971807: buster-pu: package webext-tbsync "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2020-10-16 19:30 +0200
Bug#971807: buster-pu: package webext-tbsync "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2020-10-10 11:50 +0200
csiph-web