Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1026120

Bug#970783: fwupd: its postinst script uses dpkg-vendor that may be not there

From Patrice DUROUX <duroux.patrice@orange.fr>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Bug#970783: fwupd: its postinst script uses dpkg-vendor that may be not there
Date 2020-09-23 12:30 +0200
Message-ID <ASac9-5bp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Package: fwupd
Version: 1.4.6-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

   * What led up to the situation?

The installation of fwupd on a fresh (minimal) Debian Testing system.

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?

Some error messages occur during the install.

   * What was the outcome of this action?

Nothing special unless the risk having EFIDIR empty at line 17 in the postinst script on run.

   * What outcome did you expect instead?

The installation without such error messages. ;-)

Thanks,
Patrice

ps: the system is not the one from which this report is done.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.8.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/24 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#970783: fwupd: its postinst script uses dpkg-vendor that may be not there Patrice DUROUX <duroux.patrice@orange.fr> - 2020-09-23 12:30 +0200

csiph-web