Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > it.comp.retrocomputing > #48025

Re: Resoconto di una Ricerca sulle relazioni fra MS-DOS (Microsoft) e CP/M (DRI)

From absent <a@bs.ent>
Newsgroups it.comp.retrocomputing
Subject Re: Resoconto di una Ricerca sulle relazioni fra MS-DOS (Microsoft) e CP/M (DRI)
Date 2016-08-07 09:26 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <no6ush$s2k$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <38780353-a304-4a14-afc5-1e992af07e72@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Articolo iniziale, di Bob Zeidman:
<http://tinyurl.com/cw8f2a2>

Articolo dopo VCF, di Tekla S.Perry:
<http://tinyurl.com/gqpcudp>
> [...cut...]
> The conclusion? Still no sign of copying of source code. And
> no evidence to support a long-running rumor that there is a
> secret command in MS-DOS that can be called to print out a
> copyright notice in Gary Kildall’s name.
> 
> However, Zeidman did find that at least 22 system calls, the
> commands used to request an action, like sending text to a
> printer or reading from a hard disk, had the same function
> number and function. That, he says, might have meant that
> Kildall "might have had a copyright claim for the system
> calls that it could have litigated against Microsoft. On the
> other hand, there is a good chance Microsoft could have
> beaten such litigation by claiming it was a «fair use»."
> 
> Meanwhile, Zeidman has had a lot of pushback since his
> original article was published, in part because it turned out
> he had an open consulting contract with Microsoft at the
> time. (He reports that it was an old and inactive contract
> and he has since severed all ties.) So he’s putting up
> $200,000 in prize money, $100,000 for anyone who can use
> "accepted forensic techniques" to prove the copying, and
> another $100,000 for anyone who can find that secret Kildall
> copyright function.
> [...cut...]

Mi par di capire che Bob non intende mollare l'osso. OK. Bravo.
Mi domando, però, se ne valga la pena: spera che MS sia stata
abbastanza distratta da rilasciare i sorgenti di MS-DOS senza
averli «curati»?

A chi giova «tangibilmente» questa battaglia?

Salut

Back to it.comp.retrocomputing | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Resoconto di una Ricerca sulle relazioni fra MS-DOS (Microsoft) e CP/M (DRI) ivbov <afc.bovo@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 07:34 -0700
  Re: Resoconto di una Ricerca sulle relazioni fra MS-DOS (Microsoft) e CP/M (DRI) absent <a@bs.ent> - 2016-08-07 09:26 +0000
    Re: Resoconto di una Ricerca sulle relazioni fra MS-DOS (Microsoft) e CP/M (DRI) Piero Soldi <piero.soldi@libero.it> - 2016-08-07 17:41 +0200

csiph-web