Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > it.comp.retrocomputing > #48025
| From | absent <a@bs.ent> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | it.comp.retrocomputing |
| Subject | Re: Resoconto di una Ricerca sulle relazioni fra MS-DOS (Microsoft) e CP/M (DRI) |
| Date | 2016-08-07 09:26 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <no6ush$s2k$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <38780353-a304-4a14-afc5-1e992af07e72@googlegroups.com> |
Articolo iniziale, di Bob Zeidman: <http://tinyurl.com/cw8f2a2> Articolo dopo VCF, di Tekla S.Perry: <http://tinyurl.com/gqpcudp> > [...cut...] > The conclusion? Still no sign of copying of source code. And > no evidence to support a long-running rumor that there is a > secret command in MS-DOS that can be called to print out a > copyright notice in Gary Kildall’s name. > > However, Zeidman did find that at least 22 system calls, the > commands used to request an action, like sending text to a > printer or reading from a hard disk, had the same function > number and function. That, he says, might have meant that > Kildall "might have had a copyright claim for the system > calls that it could have litigated against Microsoft. On the > other hand, there is a good chance Microsoft could have > beaten such litigation by claiming it was a «fair use»." > > Meanwhile, Zeidman has had a lot of pushback since his > original article was published, in part because it turned out > he had an open consulting contract with Microsoft at the > time. (He reports that it was an old and inactive contract > and he has since severed all ties.) So he’s putting up > $200,000 in prize money, $100,000 for anyone who can use > "accepted forensic techniques" to prove the copying, and > another $100,000 for anyone who can find that secret Kildall > copyright function. > [...cut...] Mi par di capire che Bob non intende mollare l'osso. OK. Bravo. Mi domando, però, se ne valga la pena: spera che MS sia stata abbastanza distratta da rilasciare i sorgenti di MS-DOS senza averli «curati»? A chi giova «tangibilmente» questa battaglia? Salut
Back to it.comp.retrocomputing | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Resoconto di una Ricerca sulle relazioni fra MS-DOS (Microsoft) e CP/M (DRI) ivbov <afc.bovo@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 07:34 -0700
Re: Resoconto di una Ricerca sulle relazioni fra MS-DOS (Microsoft) e CP/M (DRI) absent <a@bs.ent> - 2016-08-07 09:26 +0000
Re: Resoconto di una Ricerca sulle relazioni fra MS-DOS (Microsoft) e CP/M (DRI) Piero Soldi <piero.soldi@libero.it> - 2016-08-07 17:41 +0200
csiph-web