Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.theory > #113296 > unrolled thread
| Started by | olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-02-07 17:13 -0600 |
| Last post | 2025-02-13 07:17 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 490 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.theory
Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-07 17:13 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-07 18:55 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-07 19:18 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-08 10:54 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 08:43 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-08 22:49 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 00:04 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-09 09:09 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 09:15 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-09 16:53 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 10:37 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-09 17:43 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 10:49 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-09 12:05 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-09 19:47 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 13:00 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-09 20:30 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 13:33 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-09 14:37 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-10 09:27 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-10 11:05 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-09 19:42 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 13:57 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-09 18:05 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-10 13:15 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-09 19:39 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 13:57 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-09 18:05 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 17:22 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-09 19:19 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-10 11:18 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 06:04 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-10 07:41 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-10 12:57 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-09 19:34 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-09 12:04 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-09 08:08 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 09:39 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-09 12:04 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-08 17:29 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-09 11:48 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 09:21 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-09 12:04 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-10 10:33 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 05:53 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-10 07:41 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-11 11:22 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-09 11:49 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-08 12:25 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 08:55 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-08 17:29 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-09 12:08 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 09:24 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-09 16:39 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 10:43 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-09 12:04 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-10 10:35 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 05:58 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-10 07:41 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-11 11:27 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 08:41 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-11 18:41 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-12 12:04 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 22:21 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-13 11:20 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-13 18:07 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-13 22:15 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-13 22:21 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-14 12:54 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-14 17:29 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-14 19:38 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-15 10:03 +0000
DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 21:25 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-16 07:09 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-16 07:19 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-16 12:55 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 07:32 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-16 13:50 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-16 13:40 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-16 21:24 +0100
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-19 22:08 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-20 10:28 +0200
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-20 07:02 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-20 20:12 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-21 10:10 +0200
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-21 16:39 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-21 20:05 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-22 10:45 +0200
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 10:06 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-22 16:49 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 12:14 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-22 19:02 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-22 19:02 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-23 11:43 +0200
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 11:34 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-23 19:12 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-24 10:32 +0200
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 17:22 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-24 19:04 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 19:10 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-25 08:09 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 11:51 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-25 18:13 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-25 10:32 +0100
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-25 16:35 +0200
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 15:16 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-25 18:41 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 19:50 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-25 23:21 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 22:36 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-26 07:01 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-26 10:39 +0200
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-20 10:00 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-21 21:55 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-22 11:01 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 10:43 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 12:10 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 12:02 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 13:21 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 12:54 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 14:17 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 13:33 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 14:40 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 14:03 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 15:09 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 14:53 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 15:59 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 16:53 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 17:59 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 18:33 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 21:34 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 11:30 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 12:57 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 18:10 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 19:15 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 19:13 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 20:22 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 20:04 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 22:15 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 21:20 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 23:09 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 22:42 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 23:45 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 23:01 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 00:08 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 23:17 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 08:11 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 08:23 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 08:52 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 08:48 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 10:03 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 15:26 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-24 21:44 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 17:18 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 16:47 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 17:16 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 19:06 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 19:12 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 20:26 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 19:47 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 20:51 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 19:59 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 21:04 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 20:15 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 21:18 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 21:51 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 22:59 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 22:03 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 23:12 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 08:41 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 09:56 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 11:44 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-25 18:10 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 13:47 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-25 07:18 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-25 08:15 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 21:48 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 22:59 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-25 08:07 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-24 09:34 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 17:46 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 19:21 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-22 22:38 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-22 18:10 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-22 19:02 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-23 12:46 +0200
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 11:35 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-23 19:12 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-24 10:41 +0200
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 17:28 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-24 19:05 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 19:21 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-24 23:02 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 22:11 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-25 07:18 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-25 16:49 +0200
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 15:13 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN --- Saving Democracy Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-26 10:44 +0200
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-22 07:15 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-20 07:19 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-14 08:21 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-14 17:32 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-14 19:38 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-15 10:02 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-14 10:58 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-14 06:40 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-14 08:21 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-14 14:49 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-14 17:33 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-14 19:38 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-15 09:17 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-15 10:00 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-15 10:49 +0200
DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 19:13 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-15 20:38 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-16 11:35 +0200
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-25 18:13 +0200
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 12:01 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-25 18:07 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 12:25 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-25 18:41 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 20:09 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-25 23:21 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 22:39 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-26 07:04 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-26 10:25 +0100
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 13:49 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 14:46 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 16:17 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 17:40 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 21:53 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 21:50 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 17:14 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 21:52 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 21:38 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 22:45 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 21:54 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 23:08 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 22:14 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 08:22 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 08:27 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 09:43 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 19:43 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-25 18:41 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 20:05 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-25 23:21 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 22:44 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-26 07:09 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-26 10:58 +0200
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-26 10:20 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 21:16 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-16 07:10 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-16 12:53 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 07:25 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-16 13:39 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 06:51 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-16 16:35 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 13:24 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-16 20:02 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 15:58 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-16 22:30 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 16:51 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-16 20:08 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-17 10:05 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 08:09 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-17 19:50 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-18 11:24 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 05:26 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-18 07:25 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 07:37 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-18 13:48 +0000
DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 10:34 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-18 16:50 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-18 18:33 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 22:10 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-19 07:03 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-18 15:11 +0100
DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 10:48 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-18 18:36 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-19 11:55 +0100
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-19 18:34 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-19 21:14 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-19 20:56 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-20 09:56 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-21 21:57 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-22 07:15 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-20 07:19 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-20 17:42 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-21 10:15 +0200
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-20 10:35 +0100
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-21 17:15 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-21 20:05 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-22 10:34 +0100
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 10:28 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-22 16:45 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 12:07 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-22 18:17 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 12:57 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-22 19:15 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 13:36 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-22 19:02 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-22 19:02 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-22 19:02 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-22 19:02 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-20 09:52 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-21 21:57 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-22 10:38 +0100
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 10:33 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-22 19:02 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- ONE POINT AT A TIME !!! Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-22 07:15 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-18 18:32 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 22:08 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-19 07:41 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-19 18:38 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-19 21:14 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-19 07:08 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-19 11:01 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-19 18:31 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-19 21:14 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-20 10:38 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-20 15:31 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2025-02-20 22:38 +0000
DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-20 18:25 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-20 20:12 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-21 10:21 +0100
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-21 16:40 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-21 20:05 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-21 12:09 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-21 07:21 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-21 17:09 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-21 20:05 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-22 11:05 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 10:52 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-22 19:02 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-22 19:02 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 18:45 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 21:41 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 11:32 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 12:58 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-23 21:50 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 21:36 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 23:44 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-24 09:32 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 17:38 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-24 19:04 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 19:16 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-24 23:02 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 22:09 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-25 07:18 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-24 07:16 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 18:06 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-24 19:16 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-25 10:43 +0100
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-22 22:38 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-23 12:56 +0200
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 11:40 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-23 19:12 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-23 11:52 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 11:47 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-23 18:21 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 19:17 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-23 21:50 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-23 19:12 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-25 11:02 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-20 20:12 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-21 10:18 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-21 16:35 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-21 20:05 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-22 11:04 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 10:11 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-22 22:38 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-23 12:59 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 11:44 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-23 19:12 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-24 10:47 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-24 17:36 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-24 19:04 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-25 10:47 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-25 16:59 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 15:12 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-25 18:41 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 20:13 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-25 23:21 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 22:50 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-26 10:48 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 08:49 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-26 15:52 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 22:40 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-27 07:41 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-27 10:36 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-27 13:06 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-27 20:20 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-27 17:18 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-28 09:53 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 18:56 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-03-01 07:49 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-27 21:00 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-27 18:04 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-28 08:46 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 18:51 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-03-01 11:24 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-03-01 07:49 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-28 10:01 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 19:05 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-03-01 11:38 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-03-01 07:49 -0500
Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers are wrong [2] olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 11:04 -0600
Re: Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers are wrong [2] joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-03-02 19:19 +0000
Re: Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers are wrong [2] olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 13:27 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-03-02 11:10 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-27 20:00 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-27 22:20 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-28 08:42 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-28 09:30 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 19:56 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-03-01 07:49 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-27 07:40 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-26 17:05 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 22:42 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-27 07:40 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-26 18:50 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 23:00 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-27 07:32 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-27 09:16 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-27 20:00 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-27 10:50 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-27 14:13 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-27 20:45 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-27 17:28 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-27 20:00 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-28 08:54 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 19:00 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-03-01 11:27 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-03-01 07:49 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-28 10:06 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 19:15 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-27 20:00 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-27 07:40 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-26 07:14 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-26 09:29 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 08:45 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-26 15:50 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 22:34 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-27 07:42 +0000
DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- very stupid requirement olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-27 09:26 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- very stupid requirement joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-27 15:55 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- very stupid requirement olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-27 14:25 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- very stupid requirement joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-27 20:42 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- very stupid requirement olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-27 17:21 -0600
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- very stupid requirement Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-27 20:00 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- very stupid requirement Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-27 22:42 +0000
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- very stupid requirement Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-27 20:00 -0500
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- very stupid requirement "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-28 10:09 +0100
Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- very stupid requirement Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-27 20:00 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-27 07:40 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-26 17:12 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 22:49 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-27 10:58 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-27 14:18 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-27 21:05 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-27 20:00 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-27 22:25 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-28 08:41 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-28 09:49 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-28 09:30 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 19:57 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-03-01 07:49 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-28 09:44 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-27 07:40 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-26 18:53 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-26 23:04 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-27 11:02 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-27 07:40 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-26 11:08 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-20 10:43 +0200
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-20 11:54 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-21 17:12 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-02-22 11:03 +0000
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-16 20:08 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-02-17 10:04 +0100
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-16 16:52 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 16:08 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-16 20:08 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 22:43 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-17 06:57 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-02-17 08:25 -0600
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-17 19:50 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-16 20:08 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-16 13:39 -0500
Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-02-13 07:17 -0500
Page 21 of 25 — ← Prev page 1 … 19 20 [21] 22 23 … 25 Next page →
| From | joes <noreply@example.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-01 11:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <eefb001eea71c7b0a54fdfe7e7fd3bd715b1d1d5@i2pn2.org> |
| In reply to | #113991 |
Am Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:51:46 -0600 schrieb olcott: > On 2/28/2025 2:46 AM, joes wrote: >> Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 18:04:48 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>> On 2/27/2025 3:00 PM, joes wrote: >>>> Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:06:41 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott: >>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >>>>>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the >>>>>>>>>>> emulation being incorrect or you would have provided the >>>>>>>>>>> correct emulation sequence long ago. >>>>>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th >>>>>>>>>> instruction, >>>>>>>>>> the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>>>>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>>>>>>> There can be no correct continuation. >>>>>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. >>>>>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is. >>>>> That dishonestly dodged the original question: >>>>> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH? >>>> Look at what HHH1 does. >> >>>> Anyway: ignoring the call to HHH, >>> Is stupidly wrong. >> You only asked for the trace of DD. > Within the context of the title of this thread knucklehead. Huh? Makes no sense. >>>> because it doesn't call DD in turn, >>>> we continue with 2141 until the conditional jump, whereupon we either >>>> enter an infinite loop (which is more than 15 instructions) >>>> or proceed to return (which is 13 instructions), depending on the >>>> return value of HHH. There are your lines of DD. -- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math: It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-01 07:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <f46da84635e6a9ffd851f982102bb7557aea956c@i2pn2.org> |
| In reply to | #113991 |
On 2/28/25 7:51 PM, olcott wrote: > On 2/28/2025 2:46 AM, joes wrote: >> Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 18:04:48 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>> On 2/27/2025 3:00 PM, joes wrote: >>>> Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:06:41 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott: >>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >>>>>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation >>>>>>>>>>> being incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation >>>>>>>>>>> sequence long ago. >>>>>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th >>>>>>>>>> instruction, >>>>>>>>>> the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>>>>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>>>>>>> There can be no correct continuation. >>>>>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. >>>>>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is. >>>>> That dishonestly dodged the original question: >>>>> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH? >>>> Look at what HHH1 does. >> >>>> Anyway: ignoring the call to HHH, >>> Is stupidly wrong. >> You only asked for the trace of DD. >> > > Within the context of the title of this thread knucklehead. No, you don't understand what the words you use mean. Behavior of programs doesn't depend on who looks at it, > >>>> because it doesn't call DD in turn, >>>> we continue with 2141 until the conditional jump, whereupon we either >>>> enter an infinite loop (which is more than 15 instructions) >>>> or proceed to return (which is 13 instructions), depending on the >>>> return value of HHH. > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-28 10:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vpru0l$3j25p$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #113955 |
Op 28.feb.2025 om 01:04 schreef olcott: > On 2/27/2025 3:00 PM, joes wrote: >> Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:06:41 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott: >>>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >>>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation >>>>>>>>> being incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation >>>>>>>>> sequence long ago. >>>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th instruction, >>>>>>>> the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>>>>> There can be no correct continuation. >>>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. >>>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is. >>> That dishonestly dodged the original question: >>> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH? >> Look at what HHH1 does. >> >>> _DD() >>> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>> [00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>> [00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local >>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >>> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>> [00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax >>> [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >>> [0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f >>> [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d >>> [0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >>> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp >>> [00002154] 5d pop ebp >>> [00002155] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] > >> Anyway: ignoring the call to HHH, > Is stupidly wrong. It is not wrong, because HHH and its return value are not given in the instructions above. But if we assume that it is Olcotts's HHH that returns 0, we can continue with 2141 and then continue up to 2155.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-28 19:05 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vptmgl$3st19$13@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #113982 |
On 2/28/2025 3:01 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: > Op 28.feb.2025 om 01:04 schreef olcott: >> On 2/27/2025 3:00 PM, joes wrote: >>> Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:06:41 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott: >>>>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >>>>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation >>>>>>>>>> being incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation >>>>>>>>>> sequence long ago. >>>>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th instruction, >>>>>>>>> the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>>>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>>>>>> There can be no correct continuation. >>>>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. >>>>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is. >>>> That dishonestly dodged the original question: >>>> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH? >>> Look at what HHH1 does. >>> >>>> _DD() >>>> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>> [00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>> [00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local >>>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >>>> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>>> [00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax >>>> [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >>>> [0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f >>>> [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d >>>> [0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >>>> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp >>>> [00002154] 5d pop ebp >>>> [00002155] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] >> >>> Anyway: ignoring the call to HHH, >> Is stupidly wrong. > It is not wrong, because HHH and its return value are not given in the > instructions above. > But if we assume that it is Olcotts's HHH that returns 0, we can > continue with 2141 and then continue up to 2155. I am no longer going reply to each individual. I will reply to each point only once. A new post replies to everyone's reply DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-01 11:38 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <vpukjb$5nda$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #113995 |
On 2025-03-01 01:05:25 +0000, olcott said: > On 2/28/2025 3:01 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >> Op 28.feb.2025 om 01:04 schreef olcott: >>> On 2/27/2025 3:00 PM, joes wrote: >>>> Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:06:41 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott: >>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >>>>>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation >>>>>>>>>>> being incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation >>>>>>>>>>> sequence long ago. >>>>>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th instruction, >>>>>>>>>> the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>>>>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>>>>>>> There can be no correct continuation. >>>>>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. >>>>>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is. >>>>> That dishonestly dodged the original question: >>>>> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH? >>>> Look at what HHH1 does. >>>> >>>>> _DD() >>>>> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>>> [00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>>> [00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local >>>>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >>>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >>>>> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>>>> [00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax >>>>> [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >>>>> [0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f >>>>> [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d >>>>> [0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >>>>> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp >>>>> [00002154] 5d pop ebp >>>>> [00002155] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] >>> >>>> Anyway: ignoring the call to HHH, >>> Is stupidly wrong. >> It is not wrong, because HHH and its return value are not given in the >> instructions above. >> But if we assume that it is Olcotts's HHH that returns 0, we can >> continue with 2141 and then continue up to 2155. > > I am no longer going reply to each individual. > I will reply to each point only once. That would be better than a pointless reply. -- Mikko
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-01 07:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6d2af9cf82db4fbfd0e874231e1fe7d9cde35fe5@i2pn2.org> |
| In reply to | #113995 |
On 2/28/25 8:05 PM, olcott wrote: > On 2/28/2025 3:01 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >> Op 28.feb.2025 om 01:04 schreef olcott: >>> On 2/27/2025 3:00 PM, joes wrote: >>>> Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:06:41 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott: >>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >>>>>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation >>>>>>>>>>> being incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation >>>>>>>>>>> sequence long ago. >>>>>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th >>>>>>>>>> instruction, >>>>>>>>>> the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>>>>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>>>>>>> There can be no correct continuation. >>>>>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. >>>>>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is. >>>>> That dishonestly dodged the original question: >>>>> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH? >>>> Look at what HHH1 does. >>>> >>>>> _DD() >>>>> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>>> [00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>>> [00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local >>>>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >>>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >>>>> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>>>> [00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax >>>>> [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >>>>> [0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f >>>>> [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d >>>>> [0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >>>>> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp >>>>> [00002154] 5d pop ebp >>>>> [00002155] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] >>> >>>> Anyway: ignoring the call to HHH, >>> Is stupidly wrong. >> It is not wrong, because HHH and its return value are not given in the >> instructions above. >> But if we assume that it is Olcotts's HHH that returns 0, we can >> continue with 2141 and then continue up to 2155. > > I am no longer going reply to each individual. > I will reply to each point only once. > > A new post replies to everyone's reply > DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code > > Which is based on your false assumption that an aborted simulation is still the exact same thing as an unaborted correct simulation. Sorry, you are just caught in your lies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-02 11:04 -0600 |
| Subject | Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers are wrong [2] |
| Message-ID | <vq233j$ru20$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #113946 |
On 2/27/2025 3:00 PM, joes wrote: > Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:06:41 -0600 schrieb olcott: >> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott: >>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation >>>>>>>> being incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation >>>>>>>> sequence long ago. >>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th instruction, >>>>>>> the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>>>> There can be no correct continuation. >>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. >>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is. >> That dishonestly dodged the original question: >> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH? > Look at what HHH1 does. > >> _DD() >> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >> [00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >> [00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local >> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 >> [00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax >> [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >> [0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f >> [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d >> [0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp >> [00002154] 5d pop ebp >> [00002155] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] > Anyway: ignoring the call to HHH It moronically stupid unless HHH ignores this call and HHH does not ignore this call. HHH emulates itself emulating DD at this point as this code conclusively proves. https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c Your lack of comprehension of that code is less than no rebuttal at all. *The question is* What are the hexadecimal machine addresses of the first 10 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? A failure to answer that question with ten hexadecimal values proves that the reviewer is either dishonest or clueless. > because it doesn't call DD in turn, > we continue with 2141 until the conditional jump, whereupon we > either enter an infinite loop (which is more than 15 instructions) > or proceed to return (which is 13 instructions), depending on the > return value of HHH. > -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | joes <noreply@example.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-02 19:19 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers are wrong [2] |
| Message-ID | <119e547c3e83ba976982163b6dcae24281ac168e@i2pn2.org> |
| In reply to | #114094 |
Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 11:04:51 -0600 schrieb olcott: > On 2/27/2025 3:00 PM, joes wrote: >> Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:06:41 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott: >>>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >>>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation >>>>>>>>> being incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation >>>>>>>>> sequence long ago. >>>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th >>>>>>>> instruction, >>>>>>>> the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>>>>> There can be no correct continuation. >>>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. >>>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is. >>> That dishonestly dodged the original question: >>> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH? >> Look at what HHH1 does. >> >>> _DD() >>> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping [00002134] 8bec >>> mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping [00002136] 51 push ecx ; >>> make space for local [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >>> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 [00002144] 8945fc mov >>> [ebp-04],eax [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 [0000214b] >>> 7402 jz 0000214f [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d [0000214f] >>> 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >>> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp [00002154] 5d pop ebp >>> [00002155] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] > >> Anyway: ignoring the call to HHH > It moronically stupid unless HHH ignores this call and HHH does not > ignore this call. You didn't ask for the trace of HHH. > What are the hexadecimal machine addresses of the first 10 lines of DD > correctly emulated by HHH? > A failure to answer that question with ten hexadecimal values proves > that the reviewer is either dishonest or clueless. Or lazy. See below. >> because it doesn't call DD in turn, >> we continue with 2141 until the conditional jump, whereupon we either >> enter an infinite loop (which is more than 15 instructions) >> or proceed to return (which is 13 instructions), depending on the >> return value of HHH. -- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math: It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-02 13:27 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers are wrong [2] |
| Message-ID | <vq2bf7$tgu6$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #114102 |
On 3/2/2025 1:19 PM, joes wrote: > Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 11:04:51 -0600 schrieb olcott: >> On 2/27/2025 3:00 PM, joes wrote: >>> Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:06:41 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott: >>>>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >>>>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation >>>>>>>>>> being incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation >>>>>>>>>> sequence long ago. >>>>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th >>>>>>>>> instruction, >>>>>>>>> the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>>>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>>>>>> There can be no correct continuation. >>>>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. >>>>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is. >>>> That dishonestly dodged the original question: >>>> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH? >>> Look at what HHH1 does. >>> >>>> _DD() >>>> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping [00002134] 8bec >>>> mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping [00002136] 51 push ecx ; >>>> make space for local [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >>>> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 [00002144] 8945fc mov >>>> [ebp-04],eax [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 [0000214b] >>>> 7402 jz 0000214f [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d [0000214f] >>>> 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >>>> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp [00002154] 5d pop ebp >>>> [00002155] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] >> >>> Anyway: ignoring the call to HHH >> It moronically stupid unless HHH ignores this call and HHH does not >> ignore this call. > You didn't ask for the trace of HHH. > OK I will simplify for you. I want the execution trace of DD and only DD for its first 10 instructions and this must include the execution trace of DD emulated by HHH emulating itself. -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-02 11:10 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vq23ed$ru20$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #113946 |
On 2/27/2025 3:00 PM, joes wrote: > Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:06:41 -0600 schrieb olcott: >> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott: >>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation >>>>>>>> being incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation >>>>>>>> sequence long ago. >>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th instruction, >>>>>>> the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>>>> There can be no correct continuation. >>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. >>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is. >> That dishonestly dodged the original question: >> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH? > Look at what HHH1 does. > >> _DD() >> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >> [00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >> [00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local >> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 >> [00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax >> [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >> [0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f >> [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d >> [0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp >> [00002154] 5d pop ebp >> [00002155] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] > Anyway: ignoring the call to HHH, It moronically stupid because this code proves that it does not do that https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-27 20:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <b15b2b913b3c10998fe6e8fb262882da82ea95e7@i2pn2.org> |
| In reply to | #113935 |
On 2/27/25 2:06 PM, olcott wrote: > On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott: >>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation >>>>>>> being >>>>>>> incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation sequence >>>>>>> long ago. >>>> >>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th instruction, >>>>>> the >>>>>> 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>> >>>> There can be no correct continuation. >>>> >>> >>> I say what the correct simulation is. >>> You say that I am wrong. >>> >>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. >> >> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is. >> > > That dishonestly dodged the original question: > What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH? > > _DD() > [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping > [00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping > [00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local > [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD > [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) > [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 > [00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax > [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 > [0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f > [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d > [0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] > [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp > [00002154] 5d pop ebp > [00002155] c3 ret > Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] > > PROBLEM BLOWS UP as the value of memory 000015c3 isn't specified as part of the input, and thus the attempt to access it destroys the decider, proving it is just impure. Sorry, you are just proving your utter stupidity, and that you are just a pathological liar.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-27 22:20 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vprdis$3gqpb$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #113963 |
On 2/27/2025 7:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 2/27/25 2:06 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott: >>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation >>>>>>>> being >>>>>>>> incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation sequence >>>>>>>> long ago. >>>>> >>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th >>>>>>> instruction, the >>>>>>> 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>>> >>>>> There can be no correct continuation. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I say what the correct simulation is. >>>> You say that I am wrong. >>>> >>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. >>> >>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is. >>> >> >> That dishonestly dodged the original question: >> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH? >> >> _DD() >> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >> [00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >> [00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local >> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 >> [00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax >> [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >> [0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f >> [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d >> [0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp >> [00002154] 5d pop ebp >> [00002155] c3 ret >> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] >> >> > > PROBLEM BLOWS UP as the value of memory 000015c3 isn't specified as part When you are told that this address specifies an x86 emulator then disagreement is incorrect. 100 let x = 5 If you say that you don't believe that x = 5 then you are wrong. -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | joes <noreply@example.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-28 08:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d05963c8e913d576e0184750ce352d31d68d125f@i2pn2.org> |
| In reply to | #113971 |
Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 22:20:44 -0600 schrieb olcott: > On 2/27/2025 7:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/27/25 2:06 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott: >>>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >>>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation >>>>>>>>> being incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation >>>>>>>>> sequence long ago. >>>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th >>>>>>>> instruction, the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this >>>>>>>> instruction, >>>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>>>>> There can be no correct continuation. >>>>> I say what the correct simulation is. >>>>> You say that I am wrong. >>>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. >>>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is. >>> That dishonestly dodged the original question: >>> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH? >> PROBLEM BLOWS UP as the value of memory 000015c3 isn't specified as >> part > When you are told that this address specifies an x86 emulator then > disagreement is incorrect. Let's naively assume it doesn't produce any side effects. Then it depends on the return value. -- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math: It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-28 09:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <78103fcc08b60687e9f0939fbc4730742fad495d@i2pn2.org> |
| In reply to | #113971 |
On 2/27/25 11:20 PM, olcott wrote: > On 2/27/2025 7:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/27/25 2:06 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott: >>>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >>>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the >>>>>>>>> emulation being >>>>>>>>> incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation >>>>>>>>> sequence >>>>>>>>> long ago. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th >>>>>>>> instruction, the >>>>>>>> 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>>>> >>>>>> There can be no correct continuation. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I say what the correct simulation is. >>>>> You say that I am wrong. >>>>> >>>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. >>>> >>>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is. >>>> >>> >>> That dishonestly dodged the original question: >>> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH? >>> >>> _DD() >>> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>> [00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>> [00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local >>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >>> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>> [00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax >>> [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >>> [0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f >>> [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d >>> [0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >>> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp >>> [00002154] 5d pop ebp >>> [00002155] c3 ret >>> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] >>> >>> >> >> PROBLEM BLOWS UP as the value of memory 000015c3 isn't specified as part > > When you are told that this address specifies an > x86 emulator then disagreement is incorrect. > Isw ee are told it has a x86 emulatolr, when it has just a partial emulator, we were told a lie, and it is correct to disagree with a lie. HHH isn't supposed to be an "emulator", it is supposed to be the decider we consider to be the correct halt decider, and thus, we know it MUST return an answer. IF HHH was actually an x86 emulator, it could not abort, and thus wouldn't return an answer, thus, your HHH can NOT be such a emulator, and your conditions are just a contradiction. To define it as an emulator is just a lying strawman. Your logic is just built on the lie of the existance of the truth fairy that can make impossible things happen. Your stupidity believes that lie, that a "partial emulator" can be a "correct emulator" and thus your whole world is built on your fantasies, turning you into a pathological liar, as shown by your instance that your HHH is two different things at once. > 100 let x = 5 > If you say that you don't believe that x = 5 then you are wrong. > But there x is 5, the problem is that HHH is not an emulator.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-28 19:56 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vptpgn$3st19$17@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #113987 |
On 2/28/2025 8:30 AM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 2/27/25 11:20 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 2/27/2025 7:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 2/27/25 2:06 PM, olcott wrote: >>>> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott: >>>>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >>>>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the >>>>>>>>>> emulation being >>>>>>>>>> incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation >>>>>>>>>> sequence >>>>>>>>>> long ago. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th >>>>>>>>> instruction, the >>>>>>>>> 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>>>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>>>>> >>>>>>> There can be no correct continuation. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I say what the correct simulation is. >>>>>> You say that I am wrong. >>>>>> >>>>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. >>>>> >>>>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is. >>>>> >>>> >>>> That dishonestly dodged the original question: >>>> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH? >>>> >>>> _DD() >>>> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>> [00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>> [00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local >>>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >>>> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>>> [00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax >>>> [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >>>> [0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f >>>> [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d >>>> [0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >>>> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp >>>> [00002154] 5d pop ebp >>>> [00002155] c3 ret >>>> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> PROBLEM BLOWS UP as the value of memory 000015c3 isn't specified as part >> >> When you are told that this address specifies an >> x86 emulator then disagreement is incorrect. >> > Isw ee are told it has a x86 emulatolr, See this post DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-01 07:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ee252bb2e35cd1b4df4b52ef5883166c7dbf041e@i2pn2.org> |
| In reply to | #113999 |
On 2/28/25 8:56 PM, olcott wrote: > On 2/28/2025 8:30 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 2/27/25 11:20 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 2/27/2025 7:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>> On 2/27/25 2:06 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott: >>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >>>>>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the >>>>>>>>>>> emulation being >>>>>>>>>>> incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation >>>>>>>>>>> sequence >>>>>>>>>>> long ago. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th >>>>>>>>>> instruction, the >>>>>>>>>> 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>>>>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There can be no correct continuation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I say what the correct simulation is. >>>>>>> You say that I am wrong. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. >>>>>> >>>>>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That dishonestly dodged the original question: >>>>> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>> >>>>> _DD() >>>>> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>>> [00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>>> [00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local >>>>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >>>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >>>>> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>>>> [00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax >>>>> [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >>>>> [0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f >>>>> [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d >>>>> [0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >>>>> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp >>>>> [00002154] 5d pop ebp >>>>> [00002155] c3 ret >>>>> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> PROBLEM BLOWS UP as the value of memory 000015c3 isn't specified as >>>> part >>> >>> When you are told that this address specifies an >>> x86 emulator then disagreement is incorrect. >>> >> Isw ee are told it has a x86 emulatolr, > > See this post > DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code > Yea, pointed out your errors there. Until you show where I make an error, you are just proven to be a blantant liar, that doesn't care about the truth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-27 07:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <15038c4a3ee336efd26052dc98f24b3f32f69b72@i2pn2.org> |
| In reply to | #113905 |
On 2/26/25 11:40 PM, olcott wrote: > On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> >>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation being >>>>> incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation sequence >>>>> long ago. >> >>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th instruction, the >>>> 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. > >> There can be no correct continuation. >> > > I say what the correct simulation is. No, you say what you think a correct simulation is, but it breaks the rules of a correct simulation, thus it isn't correct. > You say that I am wrong. > Because you are. > If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. > You can't say what this is only because I have always been correct. > Yes, but HHH doesn't need to be able to do it, since it doesn't. HHH1 does a correct simulation of the input, and gives the right answer. The fact that HHH doesn't do that shows it is incorrect, and you are just a stupid liar. Your logic is just filled with false and impossible premises, which have taken all your intelegence away.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-26 17:05 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vpne59$2kaqd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #113893 |
Op 26.feb.2025 om 15:49 schreef olcott: > On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > >>> >>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about >>> the emulation being incorrect or you would have provided >>> the correct emulation sequence long ago. >>> >>> _DD() >>> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>> [00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>> [00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local >>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >>> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>> [00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax >>> [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >>> [0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f >>> [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d >>> [0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >>> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp >>> [00002154] 5d pop ebp >>> [00002155] c3 ret >>> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] >>> >>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>> >> >> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th instruction, the >> 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, > You dodged the actual question. > What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. > Olcott does not understand that it was an answer. As I said, the first instruction incorrectly simulated is 5. Of the 15 instructions, only the first 4 are may have been simulated correctly, before it fails. Olcott knows that his simulation is incorrect, or he would have shown the first instruction with different behaviour from the direct execution long ago.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-26 22:42 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vpoqf9$2vaf3$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #113896 |
On 2/26/2025 10:05 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: > Op 26.feb.2025 om 15:49 schreef olcott: >> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> >>>> >>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about >>>> the emulation being incorrect or you would have provided >>>> the correct emulation sequence long ago. >>>> >>>> _DD() >>>> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>> [00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>> [00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local >>>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >>>> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>>> [00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax >>>> [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >>>> [0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f >>>> [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d >>>> [0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >>>> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp >>>> [00002154] 5d pop ebp >>>> [00002155] c3 ret >>>> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] >>>> >>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>> >>> >>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th instruction, >>> the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >> You dodged the actual question. >> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >> > > Olcott does not understand that it was an answer. Anything besides a specific sequence of machine addresses dishonestly dodges my question. -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-27 07:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <073ab1bb21c046f221d8488e22dcae60af7c7ddf@i2pn2.org> |
| In reply to | #113906 |
On 2/26/25 11:42 PM, olcott wrote: > On 2/26/2025 10:05 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >> Op 26.feb.2025 om 15:49 schreef olcott: >>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about >>>>> the emulation being incorrect or you would have provided >>>>> the correct emulation sequence long ago. >>>>> >>>>> _DD() >>>>> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>>> [00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>>> [00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local >>>>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >>>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >>>>> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>>>> [00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax >>>>> [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >>>>> [0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f >>>>> [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d >>>>> [0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >>>>> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp >>>>> [00002154] 5d pop ebp >>>>> [00002155] c3 ret >>>>> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] >>>>> >>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>> >>>> >>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th instruction, >>>> the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>> You dodged the actual question. >>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>> >> >> Olcott does not understand that it was an answer. > > Anything besides a specific sequence of machine addresses > dishonestly dodges my question. > And since the contents of 000015C3 hasn't been given as part of the input, the correct simulation can not occur after the call. You are just proving you are nothing but a stupid fraud that needs to depend on changing the meaning of the words in the middle of the arguement. That you can't see that is wrong, just proves that you are nothing but a stupid pathological liar.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 21 of 25 — ← Prev page 1 … 19 20 [21] 22 23 … 25 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.theory
csiph-web