Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.theory > #107999
| From | Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory |
| Subject | Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? |
| Date | 2024-06-29 10:47 +0300 |
| Organization | - |
| Message-ID | <v5oe76$3qvno$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <v5h2vs$24jbd$3@dont-email.me> <v5j3nn$2km3o$1@dont-email.me> <v5kfat$2rv8r$2@dont-email.me> <v5ludv$3980v$1@dont-email.me> <v5mjjj$3cibm$5@dont-email.me> |
On 2024-06-28 15:07:30 +0000, olcott said: > On 6/28/2024 4:06 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-06-27 19:42:21 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> On 6/27/2024 2:18 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>> On 2024-06-26 12:53:16 +0000, olcott said: >>>> >>>>> On 6/26/2024 2:54 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Obviously false. The meaning of H(P,P) is determined by the text of H. >>>>>> The meaning is fully determined by the complier that complies to the >>>>>> x86 code and the semantics of x86. If one simulator interpretes the >>>>>> x86 code differently from another simulator then one of them does not >>>>>> follow the x86 semantics and is therefore incorrect. >>>>> >>>>> _DDD() >>>>> [00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>>> [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD >>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call H0(DDD) >>>>> [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>>>> [00002182] 5d pop ebp >>>>> [00002183] c3 ret >>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183] >>>>> >>>>> The call from DDD to >>>>> the x86 emulator H0(DDD) at machine address 0000217a >>>>> when DDD is correctly emulated by H0 cannot possibly return. >>>>> >>>>> When DDD is correctly emulated by H0 then H0 must emulate itself >>>>> emulating DDD. This derives recursive emulation. >>>>> >>>>> When DDD is correctly emulated by H1 then H1 NEED NOT emulate itself >>>>> emulating DDD. This DOES NOT derive recursive emulation. >>>> >>>> When DDD is emulated by H1 then H1 needs to the call to H0 and the >>>> instructions of H0 which emulate DDD and its call to H0 and a recorsive >>>> emulation follows. If H1 emulates correctly it must not emulate the >>>> emulation of the instruction at 217f. Unless, of course, you lied >>>> about H0. >>> >>> You contradict yourself. >> >> You have not shown any self-contradiction in my words. There is no >> obvious self-contradiction but maybe there is some less obvious >> mistake. >> >>> *Here is what actually happens* >>> >>> _DDD() >>> [00002172] 55 push ebp >>> [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp >>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD >>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH0 >>> [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>> [00002182] 5d pop ebp >>> [00002183] c3 ret >>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183] >>> >>> _main() >>> [00002192] 55 push ebp >>> [00002193] 8bec mov ebp,esp >>> [00002195] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD >>> [0000219a] e863f3ffff call 00001502 ; call HHH1(DDD) >>> [0000219f] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>> [000021a2] 50 push eax >>> [000021a3] 6843070000 push 00000743 >>> [000021a8] e8b5e5ffff call 00000762 >>> [000021ad] 83c408 add esp,+08 >>> [000021b0] eb04 jmp 000021b6 >>> [000021b2] 33c0 xor eax,eax >>> [000021b4] eb02 jmp 000021b8 >>> [000021b6] 33c0 xor eax,eax >>> [000021b8] 5d pop ebp >>> [000021b9] c3 ret >>> Size in bytes:(0040) [000021b9] >>> >>> machine stack stack machine assembly >>> address address data code language >>> ======== ======== ======== ========= ============= >>> [00002192][00103826][00000000] 55 push ebp >>> [00002193][00103826][00000000] 8bec mov ebp,esp >>> [00002195][00103822][00002172] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD >>> [0000219a][0010381e][0000219f] e863f3ffff call 00001502 ; call HHH1(DDD) >>> New slave_stack at:1038ca >>> >>> Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation Execution Trace Stored at:1138d2 >>> [00002172][001138c2][001138c6] 55 push ebp >>> [00002173][001138c2][001138c6] 8bec mov ebp,esp >>> [00002175][001138be][00002172] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD >>> [0000217a][001138ba][0000217f] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH0(DDD) >>> New slave_stack at:14e2f2 >>> >>> Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation Execution Trace Stored at:15e2fa >>> [00002172][0015e2ea][0015e2ee] 55 push ebp >>> [00002173][0015e2ea][0015e2ee] 8bec mov ebp,esp >>> [00002175][0015e2e6][00002172] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD >>> [0000217a][0015e2e2][0000217f] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH0(DDD) >>> New slave_stack at:198d1a >>> [00002172][001a8d12][001a8d16] 55 push ebp >>> [00002173][001a8d12][001a8d16] 8bec mov ebp,esp >>> [00002175][001a8d0e][00002172] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD >>> [0000217a][001a8d0a][0000217f] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH0(DDD) >>> Local Halt Decider: Infinite Recursion Detected Simulation Stopped >>> >>> [0000217f][001138c2][001138c6] 83c404 add esp,+04 ; return to DDD >>> [00002182][001138c6][000015b7] 5d pop ebp >>> [00002183][001138ca][0003a980] c3 ret ; return to main >>> [0000219f][00103826][00000000] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>> [000021a2][00103822][00000001] 50 push eax >>> [000021a3][0010381e][00000743] 6843070000 push 00000743 >>> [000021a8][0010381e][00000743] e8b5e5ffff call 00000762 >>> Input_Halts = 1 >>> [000021ad][00103826][00000000] 83c408 add esp,+08 >>> [000021b0][00103826][00000000] eb04 jmp 000021b6 >>> [000021b6][00103826][00000000] 33c0 xor eax,eax >>> [000021b8][0010382a][00000018] 5d pop ebp >>> [000021b9][0010382e][00000000] c3 ret >>> Number of Instructions Executed(352835) == 5266 Pages >> >> Is the program at 15d2 H0 or HHH0? >> > > I have standardized the naming conventions. > H0 and HHH0 are now called HHH. In which sense the names H0 and HHH0 are non-standard? -- Mikko
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 09:31 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-22 10:42 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 10:16 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-22 11:29 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 11:12 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-22 13:08 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-22 16:03 +0000
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 11:18 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-22 13:13 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 12:29 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-22 14:43 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 13:49 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-22 14:55 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 14:03 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-22 15:19 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 14:35 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-22 15:43 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 14:49 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-22 16:08 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 18:59 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-22 20:19 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 22:37 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 07:28 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 08:36 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 14:22 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-22 20:01 +0000
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 18:57 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-22 20:07 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 19:09 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-22 20:26 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-22 22:46 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 07:28 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 08:37 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-23 14:22 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-25 09:20 +0000
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-23 12:50 +0300
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 08:25 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-24 10:31 +0300
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 08:52 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 19:20 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-25 12:42 +0300
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-25 08:29 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-25 21:47 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-26 10:41 +0300
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 07:25 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-27 10:02 +0300
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-27 12:18 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-27 19:57 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-28 11:55 +0300
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-28 09:54 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-28 23:49 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-29 10:44 +0300
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-25 20:41 +0000
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-25 16:24 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-25 21:47 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-26 10:46 +0300
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 07:45 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 19:41 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-27 10:06 +0300
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-27 14:19 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-26 08:19 +0000
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-23 12:42 +0300
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-23 08:23 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-24 10:32 +0300
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-24 08:50 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? immibis <news@immibis.com> - 2024-06-24 16:03 +0200
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-25 12:48 +0300
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-25 08:19 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-25 21:47 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-26 10:54 +0300
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-26 07:53 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-26 19:41 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-27 10:18 +0300
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-27 14:42 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-27 19:57 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-28 12:06 +0300
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-06-28 10:07 -0500
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-29 10:47 +0300
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-06-24 19:21 -0400
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-06-25 12:47 +0300
Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-06-25 08:54 +0000
csiph-web