Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.theory > #106935

Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'?

Show all headers | View raw

wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> writes:

> On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 21:50 +0100, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 00:36 +0100, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> > > wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> writes:
>> > > 
>> > > > On Sun, 2024-06-09 at 20:55 +0100, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> > > > > wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> writes:
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > > ℙ≠ℕℙ
>> > > > > > Proved. https://sourceforge.net/projects/cscall/files/MisFiles/PNP-proof-en.txt/download
>> > > > > > ...[cut]
>> > > > > >    Proof2: Let p="Given a number n, determine whether or not n
>> > > > > > is even". If
>> > > > > >           ℙ=ℕℙ, then p∉ℕℙℂ is a false proposition because all
>> > > > > > ℕℙ problems
>> > > > > >           including ℕℙℂ are mutually Ptime reducible. Since
>> > > > > > p∉ℕℙℂ is true,
>> > > > > >           ℙ≠ℕℙ is concluded.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > Where is your proof that p is not NP-complete?  Since you don't know
>> > > > > this subject very well, you would benefit more from asking people to
>> > > > > direct you to resources from which you could learn, rather
>> > > > > than posting
>> > > > > provocative messages.
>> > > 
>> > > <silly insults deleted>
>> > > 
>> > > > To be on topic, can you show us the p (as mentioned) is NPC or p is
>> > > > not NPC, either will do, to prove how much you understand what you
>> > > > talked about.
>> > > 
>> > > If I could do that I would be rich, quite literally.  Sadly, I can't and
>> > > neither can anyone else on the planet (so far).  But if you think you
>> > > can, head over to the Clay Mathematics Institute and persuade them to
>> > > give you a million dollars[1].
>> > 
>> > Money corrupts soul (I had been rich enough, I know what that means).
>> 
>> Every crank has to have a reason why they post in the almost dead corner
>> of the Internet rather that publishing, gaining fame and/or fortune or,
>> in fact, doing anything to get their apparently radical ideas properly
>> disseminated.
>> 
>> Over the years, I've probably heard them all.  So you don't want the
>> money.  OK.  Why don't you want to publish where mathematicians will
>> find out about your ideas?
>
> You and Andy are the opposite kind of crank who believe they are
> knowledgeable enough. Both of these people showed many stubborn idiocy
> not aware of themselves instead stick to past illusion.  Did money
> drive you crazy? You are too far from my level. Eat the paper or title
> you had and keep dreaming.

That answer is on my crank bingo card too.  It's the "don't answer,
insult the person who asked" square.

-- 
Ben.

Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'? wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 22:11 +0800
  Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'? wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 22:17 +0800
  Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-09 20:55 +0100
    Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'? wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 05:58 +0800
      Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'? Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2024-06-09 23:57 +0100
        Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'? wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 08:06 +0800
          Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'? Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2024-06-10 14:54 +0100
            Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'? wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 22:33 +0800
      Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-10 00:36 +0100
        Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'? wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 08:12 +0800
          Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-10 21:50 +0100
            Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'? wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-06-11 12:37 +0800
              Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'? Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2024-06-11 00:32 -0600
                Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'? wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-06-11 16:01 +0800
              Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-11 11:43 +0100
        Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'? wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 22:26 +0800
          Re: Is this ℙ≠ℕℙ proof 'humiliating'? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2024-06-10 21:45 +0100

csiph-web