Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.theory > #135586
| From | Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory, comp.lang.c++, comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully |
| Date | 2025-11-14 18:01 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20251114094656.700@kylheku.com> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <10f5upq$2i4jm$1@dont-email.me> <20251113182603.463@kylheku.com> <10f64mo$2jch0$1@dont-email.me> <20251113221708.16@kylheku.com> <10f7des$2sraj$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 2025-11-14, olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/14/2025 12:35 AM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>> On 2025-11-14, olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/13/2025 8:32 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>>>> On 2025-11-14, olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> So you still don't understand that when H sees
>>>>> that D calls the same function twice in sequence
>>>>> with the same arguments and has no conditional
>>>>> code inbetween its invocation and this function
>>>>> call that this is isomorphic to infinite recursion?
>>>>
>>>> No. Obvious counterexample:
>>>>
>>>> void D(void)
>>>> {
>>>> printf("calling this twice\n");
>>>> // no conditionals here
>>>> printf("calling this twice\n");
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> You're simply not able to run a simple specification through your head
>>>> to identify the ways in which it might not reflect your intent.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why do you post such ridiculous nonsense?
>>
>> The above "D calls the same function (printf) twice in sequence with the
>> same arguments ("calling this twice\n") and has no conditional code
>> inbetween its invocation and this function call". It meets your
>> criteria; therefore it must be "isomorphic to infinite recursion".
>>
>>> Are you a complete jackass or only partial?
>>
>> I'm only conveying to you that the above function meets the words you
>> have written.
>>
>
> OK then I apologize.
My eyes must be deceiving me.
>> If you didn't intend that, that is your problem. I'm just the messenger.
>>
>> Such a messenger wouldn't be necessary if you could think for yourself.
>>
>
> https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c
> I forgot a detail on line 996
>
> Calls the same function from the same machine address
> with no conditional branches in between its invocation
> and this function call.
Now suppose that we wrongly place execution events from all
threads into a single buffer.
It can now happen like this:
void D(void)
{
(void) thread_create(D);
thread_exit(0);
}
main()
{
(void) thread_create(D);
}
The repeated call in question is D calling thread_create.
The call happens multiple times, from the same address, without
intervening conditional instructions (assuming we do not
trace system functions thread_create and thread_exit).
In our single trace buffer, it /appears/ to meet the conditions for
identifying runaway recursion.
Yet, do you not see that the threads are all terminating?
Every single new thread dispatched to D creates a new thread, which is
an asynchronous action, and then promptly terminates.
The /process/ will keep spawning new threads and fail to terminate. But
that's not the question. When we ask whether D terminates, we are not
asking whether D is surrounded by a reality which terminates.
>> Your idea that when a decider abandons a simulation and returns zero,
>> the simuation is "totally killed" does not hold water. Mathematical
>> entities are never "killed".
>>
>
> The above non-halting behavior axiom is correct.
> It conclusively proves the D simulated by H cannot
> possibly ever reach its own simulated "return"
> statement.
It doesn't. What is correct is the trick in the halting proof, that no
decider could be correct when deciding its diagonal case.
Those who are skeptical can dissect into particular complex cases to see
how they play out: i.e. to articulate in more detail why such and such a
diagonal pair case is incorrect. It is largely moot.
In your case, your logic is incorrect even for non-diagonal cases,
such as:
void DDD(void) {
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
For this non-diagonal case, your HHH could return 1 and be correct.
DDD does not behave opposite to the 1 return value; it confirms it.
--
TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr
Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal
Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 00:08 +0000
Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-13 18:36 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 00:45 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-13 18:57 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 02:32 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-13 20:38 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 06:35 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 08:13 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 18:01 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 12:19 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 18:56 +0000
Defending against libelous assessments of my work olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 13:18 -0600
Re: Defending against libelous assessments of my work Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 19:45 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-19 04:42 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-13 20:39 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 06:39 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 08:25 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 18:22 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 12:31 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 18:48 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 13:08 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 19:54 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 14:17 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 20:33 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 15:13 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 21:28 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 15:33 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 21:44 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 15:42 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 21:46 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 16:10 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-15 03:52 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 23:26 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-15 06:42 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 10:23 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-15 19:59 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 14:02 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-15 20:19 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 14:38 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 16:02 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-15 20:03 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully --- LLM olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 08:36 -0600
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully --- LLM Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 18:25 +0000
Defending against libelous assessments of my work olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 12:35 -0600
Re: Defending against libelous assessments of my work Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 18:51 +0000
Re: Defending against libelous assessments of my work olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 13:13 -0600
Re: Defending against libelous assessments of my work Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 19:43 +0000
Re: Defending against libelous assessments of my work Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-14 20:13 +0000
Re: Will keep posting this every day until someone answers truthfully Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 09:38 +0100
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-11-13 20:53 -0500
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-11-13 18:00 -0800
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2025-11-14 02:16 +0000
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2025-11-14 03:08 +0042
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2025-11-14 03:52 +0000
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 12:57 +0800
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-11-16 01:06 +0000
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? --- Ben olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 19:18 -0600
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-11-13 21:03 -0800
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-11-14 06:21 +0000
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-11-14 17:41 +0000
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2025-11-14 14:49 -0700
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-11-14 14:59 -0800
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 17:20 -0600
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-15 04:04 +0000
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 23:36 -0600
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-15 15:27 +0000
Kaz already admitted that the Sipser criteria have been met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 10:29 -0600
Re: Kaz already admitted that the Sipser criteria have been met Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-15 20:04 +0000
Re: Kaz already admitted that the Sipser criteria have been met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 14:16 -0600
Re: Kaz already admitted that the Sipser criteria have been met Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-15 21:41 +0000
Re: Kaz already admitted that the Sipser criteria have been met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 16:04 -0600
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-11-16 01:10 +0000
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? --- not a rehash olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 19:21 -0600
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? --- not a rehash Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-16 02:48 +0000
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? --- not a rehash olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 20:55 -0600
People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 21:01 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 12:10 +0800
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 22:41 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 23:13 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2025-11-16 19:56 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 19:02 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2025-11-17 02:21 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 21:47 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 21:49 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2025-11-17 04:01 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 18:35 -0800
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-17 04:29 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 22:40 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-17 05:03 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 22:47 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 22:48 -0600
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? --- not a rehash joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-11-16 14:39 +0000
Halt Deciders cannot report on the behavior of their caller olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 10:12 -0600
Kaz say that he is dumber than the Witch scene in Monty Python olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 22:19 -0600
Kaz PROVES that he is dumber than the Witch scene in Monty Python olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 22:25 -0600
Who agrees that Kaz is dumber than the Witch scene in Monty Python ? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 22:26 -0600
People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-17 07:12 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-17 18:06 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-17 12:14 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-17 22:47 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-17 18:16 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-17 12:22 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-17 22:49 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2025-11-17 19:02 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-17 13:05 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-17 13:11 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-17 13:42 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-17 21:28 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2025-11-17 22:24 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-17 17:02 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-17 23:49 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-17 19:52 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2025-11-19 16:28 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-19 11:10 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-19 17:40 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2025-11-19 15:51 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-19 11:04 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-19 18:23 +0000
People that have a very shallow understanding of these things --- AKA Kaz olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-17 09:47 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things --- AKA Kaz Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2025-11-17 16:32 +0000
People that have a very shallow understanding of these things --- "reckless disregard for the truth" olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-17 10:48 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things --- "reckless disregard for the truth" Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2025-11-17 17:42 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things --- "reckless disregard for the truth" olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-17 11:48 -0600
How teach logic? [The Jokes] (Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-18 22:46 +0100
Re: How teach logic? [The Jokes] (Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-18 16:02 -0600
Enjoying some logic under a shadowy tree? (Was: How teach logic? [The Jokes]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-18 23:15 +0100
Re: Enjoying some logic under a shadowy tree? (Was: How teach logic? [The Jokes]) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-18 16:54 -0600
What did you do before 2001 ? (Was: Enjoying some logic under a shadowy tree?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-19 09:50 +0100
What are top ten books in set theory? (Re: What did you do before 2001 ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-19 10:16 +0100
Slim Fermats Last Theorem (FLT) only for Lean4? (Was: What are top ten books in set theory?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-19 11:14 +0100
Re: How teach logic? [The Jokes] (Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-11-18 15:15 -0800
People that have a very shallow understanding of these things --- "reckless disregard for the truth" olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-17 11:41 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things --- "reckless disregard for the truth" Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-17 22:58 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things --- "reckless disregard for the truth" Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2025-11-19 16:35 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things --- "reckless disregard for the truth" Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-19 17:48 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things --- "reckless disregard for the truth" Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2025-11-19 17:57 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things --- "reckless disregard for the truth" Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-19 18:31 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things --- "reckless disregard for the truth" olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-19 12:39 -0600
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things --- "reckless disregard for the truth" Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-19 18:54 +0000
Re: People that have a very shallow understanding of these things --- "reckless disregard for the truth" olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-11-19 11:23 -0600
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 6d] Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-25 19:13 +0000
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2025-12-01 19:14 +0000
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2025-12-01 19:45 +0000
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-12-01 12:05 -0800
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-01 14:43 -0600
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-12-01 12:51 -0800
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-12-02 10:44 -0500
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-12-02 09:32 -0800
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-12-02 13:28 -0500
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-12-02 13:14 -0800
human understanding of true and proof are both flawed olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-02 15:23 -0600
Re: human understanding of true and proof are both flawed dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-12-02 14:41 -0800
Re: human understanding of true and proof are both flawed olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-02 17:03 -0600
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2025-12-02 17:32 -0500
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] polcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-02 12:10 -0600
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> - 2025-12-01 20:22 +0000
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-12-01 21:48 +0000
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2025-12-02 14:56 +0000
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-02 09:33 -0600
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-12-02 16:04 +0000
Olcott is provably correct --- no one can correctly refute this olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-03 19:47 -0600
The quality of reviewers on USENET olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-03 18:11 -0600
Olcott is provably correct --- no one can correctly refute this olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-03 19:50 -0600
Olcott is provably correct --- no one can correct refute this olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-03 19:44 -0600
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-12-05 02:45 -0800
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? [t - 0] Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2025-12-01 23:42 +0000
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-11-27 00:03 -0800
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2025-11-27 00:04 -0800
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-11-27 00:29 -0800
Re: Stop responding to Olcott by December 2025: who is in? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-11-27 00:35 -0800
csiph-web