Re: Rejecting expressions of formal language having pathological self-reference

From	Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.theory, sci.logic
Subject	Re: Rejecting expressions of formal language having pathological self-reference
Date	2025-11-15 18:08 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<10fafib$3jv01$9@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(8 earlier) <10fa7ij$3jdf0$1@dont-email.me> <10faa3m$3jv01$3@dont-email.me> <10fabs2$3kjf9$2@dont-email.me> <10fad5r$3jv01$6@dont-email.me> <10fadtg$3l73f$2@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 15/11/2025 17:40, olcott wrote:
> On 11/15/2025 11:27 AM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:
>> On 15/11/2025 17:05, olcott wrote about expert reviewers:
>>
>>> they picked out a single keyword and rejected
>>> it on that basis.
>>
>> Which keyword?
>>
> 
> "halting problem" or "Gödel's incompleteness"

Nah, no way! They would need some other word at least.

Either way, picking out one or two keywords is merely /how/ they wrongly
or rightly derived objective identity.

--
Tristan Wibberley

The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except
citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,
of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it
verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to
promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation
of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general
superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train
any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that
will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.

Thread

csiph-web