Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.transputer > #408 > unrolled thread

Looking for an INMOS IMS B017 PS/2 MCA board.

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.transputer

Contents

  Looking for an INMOS IMS B017 PS/2 MCA board. Andrew Back <andrew@carrierdetect.com> - 2021-12-22 04:26 -0800
    Re: Looking for an INMOS IMS B017 PS/2 MCA board. "Mike B." <michael_bruestle@yahoo.com> - 2021-12-23 02:38 -0800
    Re: Looking for an INMOS IMS B017 PS/2 MCA board. B419 <thematsche@gmail.com> - 2021-12-23 04:31 -0800
      Re: Looking for an INMOS IMS B017 PS/2 MCA board. Chris Hanson <cmhanson@eschatologist.net> - 2022-01-17 16:34 -0800
        Re: Looking for an INMOS IMS B017 PS/2 MCA board. Matsche <moon@tinkercave.com> - 2022-01-18 15:58 +0100
          Re: Looking for an INMOS IMS B017 PS/2 MCA board. Luca Saiu <luca@ageinghacker.net> - 2022-01-18 22:20 +0100
            Re: Looking for an INMOS IMS B017 PS/2 MCA board. Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih@hamartun.priv.no> - 2022-01-19 07:05 +0100
    Re: Looking for an INMOS IMS B017 PS/2 MCA board. "ax...@geekdot.com" <axel@geekdot.com> - 2022-01-26 02:05 -0800

#408 — Looking for an INMOS IMS B017 PS/2 MCA board.

As per the title, on the off chance that anyone has one and is looking to part with it.

Cheers,

Andrew

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#409

Hi Andrew!

Never seen a B017 during the last ~15 years. Only one AVM ISDN Controller B1-MCA (@61C7.ADF) which is now running under OS2 in an PS/2 Model 9585-0XA.

-Mike

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#410

Ugh! 
I have one, but...
...due to the lack of any MCAs I did some modifikations on it.
I don't know if it still works as expected.

Some Pics:
https://gitlab.com/tinkercnc/INMOS-Link-Driver/-/wikis/B017

BTW and OT:
Hi fellows, what do you think about using a different board/group/BB?
IMHO this google groups are realy uncomfortable.

Cheers 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#411

On 12/23/21 4:31 AM, B419 wrote:
 > BTW and OT:
 > Hi fellows, what do you think about using a different board/group/BB?
 > IMHO this google groups are realy uncomfortable.

This is not a "Google group," it's a Usenet newsgroup. That means it's a 
fully distributed bulletin board, and Google Groups is just one way to 
access it.

For example, I use Thunderbird as my client and eternal-september.org as 
my NNTP server; there are lots of other clients, including GNUS in 
emacs, and lots of other NNTP servers carrying the various groups.

The worst thing to do to a community is to migrate it to a "web forum" 
or "web chat" without an email or news gateway, because then only people 
who like visiting that type of forum in a web browser would participate. 
Usenet clients generally provide a far superior experience, and Usenet's 
distributed nature ensures that what people say actually gets archived 
properly.

   -- Chris

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#412

Am Mon, 17 Jan 2022 16:34:04 -0800
schrieb Chris Hanson <cmhanson@eschatologist.net>:

> On 12/23/21 4:31 AM, B419 wrote:
>  > BTW and OT:
>  > Hi fellows, what do you think about using a different board/group/BB?
>  > IMHO this google groups are realy uncomfortable.  
> 
> This is not a "Google group," it's a Usenet newsgroup. That means it's a 
> fully distributed bulletin board, and Google Groups is just one way to 
> access it.
> 

Yes I knew this, but I have not found a working newsserver.

> For example, I use Thunderbird as my client and eternal-september.org as 
> my NNTP server; there are lots of other clients, including GNUS in 
> emacs, and lots of other NNTP servers carrying the various groups.
> 

So, thanks for this info.
As you can see now I post through this server.

> The worst thing to do to a community is to migrate it to a "web forum" 
> or "web chat" without an email or news gateway, because then only people 
> who like visiting that type of forum in a web browser would participate. 
> Usenet clients generally provide a far superior experience, and Usenet's 
> distributed nature ensures that what people say actually gets archived 
> properly.

This was not my intention.

> 
>    -- Chris
> 
> 

Thanks again for the hint.

Matsche 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#413

On 2022-01-18 at 15:58 +0100, Matsche wrote:

> Yes I knew this, but I have not found a working newsserver.

eternal-september.org seems very stable to me, and I have used it for
years.

  https://www.eternal-september.org

(I have no personal interest and no affiliation, other than a normal
free account.)

-- 
Luca Saiu  --  http://ageinghacker.net
I support everyone's freedom of mocking any opinion or belief, no
matter how deeply held, with open disrespect and the same unrelented
enthusiasm of a toddler who has just learned the word "poo".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#414

Luca Saiu <luca@ageinghacker.net> writes:

> eternal-september.org seems very stable to me, and I have used it for
> years.

I've been very happy with news.individual.net for many years (see
https://news.individual.net/).  It's offered by the Free University of
Berlin as a paid service at EUR 10 per year.

-tih
-- 
Most people who graduate with CS degrees don't understand the significance
of Lisp.  Lisp is the most important idea in computer science.  --Alan Kay

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#415

and...@carrierdetect.com schrieb am Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2021 um 13:26:33 UTC+1:
> As per the title, on the off chance that anyone has one and is looking to part with it. 
> 
> Cheers, 
> 
> Andrew

There's one on ePay right now...
https://www.ebay.de/itm/203804184498

Cheers, Axel

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.transputer

csiph-web