IMSB427-17 vs. IMS B428-12

From	"Mike B." <michael_bruestle@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.transputer
Subject	IMSB427-17 vs. IMS B428-12
Date	2012-04-22 01:26 -0700
Organization	http://groups.google.com
Message-ID	<21413161.598.1335083218824.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbki8> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

I've done a simple compare between two TRAMs:

* IMSB427-17 (T805d-30, 4K,1+8192K,3)
* IMSB428-12 (T801b-25, 4K,1+2048K,2)

The CPU ratio is 1.20
The MEM ratio is 0.80

Test 1: icc      savage /ta
Test 2: ilink    savage.tco /f startup.lnk /ta
Test 3: icollect savage.lku /t
Test 4: iserver  /sb savage.btl

The /ta has been selected on purpose to compare mainly the CPU and not the FPU, where the T805-30 will be the obvious winner.

icc       savage /ta	2.492	2.440	1.02
ilink11.405	10.766	1.06
icollect 2.214	2.152	1.03
iserver  8.961	9.310	0.96

Back to comp.sys.transputer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

IMSB427-17 vs. IMS B428-12 "Mike B." <michael_bruestle@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-22 01:26 -0700
  Re: IMSB427-17 vs. IMS B428-12 "Mike B." <michael_bruestle@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-22 01:44 -0700

csiph-web