Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.sinclair > #847 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Chris Young" <chris.usenet@mail-filter.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-04-22 17:08 +0100 |
| Last post | 2012-05-18 05:21 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 89 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.sinclair
ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Chris Young" <chris.usenet@mail-filter.com> - 2012-04-22 17:08 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2012-04-22 20:49 +0200
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 andy rea <ask_me@ask.me> - 2012-04-22 21:43 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Wasted" <removematd@deletematd.adsl24.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:12 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetelo@ask.me> - 2012-04-23 00:37 +0200
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 spike1@freenet.co.uk - 2012-04-23 11:27 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-04-23 19:17 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 deKay <andyk@lofi-gaming.org.uk.invalid> - 2012-04-23 20:33 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-04-24 19:54 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 deKay <andyk@lofi-gaming.org.uk.invalid> - 2012-04-24 15:27 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-13 15:39 +0000
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-17 20:04 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Jan van den Broek <fortytwo@xs4all.nl> - 2012-04-23 22:03 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 hp <ferd@farkel.net> - 2012-04-24 20:07 -0400
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetelo@ask.me> - 2012-04-25 18:03 +0200
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 lizardb0y <andrew.stephen@gmail.com> - 2012-04-22 15:08 -0700
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-04-23 17:07 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 spike1@freenet.co.uk - 2012-04-23 11:28 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-04-23 19:16 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetelo@ask.me> - 2012-04-23 21:44 +0200
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-04-24 19:55 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2012-04-23 21:08 +0200
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetelo@ask.me> - 2012-04-23 21:39 +0200
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 andy rea <ask_me@ask.me> - 2012-04-23 20:45 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetelo@ask.me> - 2012-04-23 21:54 +0200
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-04-24 19:58 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetelo@ask.me> - 2012-04-24 17:21 +0200
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-04-25 06:41 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Martijn van Buul <pino@dohd.org> - 2012-04-24 12:07 +0000
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetelo@ask.me> - 2012-04-24 16:59 +0200
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-04-25 06:46 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Calum <com.gmail@nospam.scottishwildcat> - 2012-04-23 12:50 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-04-24 20:00 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-13 15:59 +0000
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-15 06:12 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-15 08:44 +0000
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-20 08:18 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Guesser <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> - 2012-05-20 01:44 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-22 16:50 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Guesser <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> - 2012-05-22 11:12 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-22 18:48 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> - 2012-05-22 12:47 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 deKay <andyk@lofi-gaming.org.uk.invalid> - 2012-05-22 13:24 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-24 06:29 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-25 21:48 +0000
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-26 18:17 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-26 13:38 +0000
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-27 10:36 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Matthew Westcott <gasman@raww.org> - 2012-05-26 20:56 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-27 10:41 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetelo@ask.me> - 2012-05-27 12:16 +0200
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-28 12:56 +0000
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Andreas Kohlbach <april12.8.ankman@spamgourmet.com> - 2012-05-28 17:35 -0400
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-30 17:56 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Andreas Kohlbach <april12.8.ankman@spamgourmet.com> - 2012-05-30 16:01 -0400
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Martijn van Buul <pino@dohd.org> - 2012-05-31 07:16 +0000
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-31 18:21 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 deKay <andyk@lofi-gaming.org.uk.invalid> - 2012-05-28 15:07 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Chris Young" <chris.usenet@mail-filter.com> - 2012-05-22 18:19 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net> - 2012-05-23 23:35 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-25 21:57 +0000
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-25 21:29 +0000
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-25 21:15 +0000
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-27 10:48 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetelo@ask.me> - 2012-05-27 12:25 +0200
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Mic <mic_carusoQWERTY@libero.it> - 2012-06-17 01:37 +0200
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Guesser <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> - 2012-05-27 11:55 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-27 21:40 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Guesser <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> - 2012-05-27 14:57 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-21 18:44 +0000
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> - 2012-05-21 01:03 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Chris Young" <chris.usenet@mail-filter.com> - 2012-05-21 18:13 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-22 16:54 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> - 2012-05-22 12:48 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-24 06:32 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> - 2012-05-24 07:01 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Chris Young" <chris.usenet@mail-filter.com> - 2012-05-24 18:15 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-26 18:23 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2012-05-26 18:29 +0200
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-26 18:21 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net> - 2012-05-26 19:53 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2012-05-26 21:19 +0200
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-27 10:50 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net> - 2012-05-28 16:32 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> - 2012-05-29 12:11 +0800
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Duncan Snowden <duncan_s@talktalk.net> - 2012-05-31 17:34 +0100
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 Groepaz <groepaz@gmx.net> - 2012-04-23 14:27 +0200
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 "Pedro" <pcm2000@teleline.es> - 2012-04-26 01:03 +0200
Re: ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 rogerjowett <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2012-05-18 05:21 -0700
Page 1 of 5 [1] 2 3 4 5 Next page →
| From | "Chris Young" <chris.usenet@mail-filter.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-22 17:08 +0100 |
| Subject | ZX Spectrum vs Commodore 64 |
| Message-ID | <4F943B27.MD-1.4.17.chris.young@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk> |
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html Discuss. Chris -- +-------------------------------------------+ | Unsatisfactory Software - "because it is" | | http://www.unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk | | Your Sinclair: A Celebration | +- http://www.yoursinclair.co.uk -----------+ DISCLAIMER: I may be making all this stuff up again.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-22 20:49 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <4f945262$0$14710$5fc3050@news.tiscali.nl> |
| In reply to | #847 |
Op 22-Apr-12 18:08, Chris Young schreef: > http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html > > Discuss. It has been discussed a gazillion times.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | andy rea <ask_me@ask.me> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-22 21:43 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <p3_kr.236988$sE1.86187@fx22.am4> |
| In reply to | #848 |
On 22/04/2012 19:49, Dombo wrote: > Op 22-Apr-12 18:08, Chris Young schreef: >> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html >> >> >> Discuss. > > It has been discussed a gazillion times. aye discussed.... But.... was there ever a difinative outcome that both sides would agree upon.....Therefor the discussion must continue....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Wasted" <removematd@deletematd.adsl24.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-22 23:12 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <coGdnR1XTKbAHwnSnZ2dnUVZ8nOdnZ2d@powerusenet.com> |
| In reply to | #849 |
"andy rea" <ask_me@ask.me> wrote in message news:p3_kr.236988$sE1.86187@fx22.am4... > On 22/04/2012 19:49, Dombo wrote: >> Op 22-Apr-12 18:08, Chris Young schreef: >>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html >>> >>> >>> Discuss. >> >> It has been discussed a gazillion times. > > aye discussed.... But.... was there ever a difinative outcome that both > sides would agree upon.....Therefor the discussion must continue.... > Its like comparing apples and pears, some people like apples, some like pears, they are not the same. But we must agree that the amstrad CPC464 was like a rotten peach, it should have been good but stank and looked like something we did not want. I'm a speccy fanboy but enjoyed my vic20 but cant beat the spec for fun :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetelo@ask.me> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-23 00:37 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <jK%kr.161404$GZ3.130009@tornado.fastwebnet.it> |
| In reply to | #851 |
Il 23/04/2012 00:12, Wasted ha scritto: >>>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html >>>> Discuss. >>> >>> It has been discussed a gazillion times. >> >> aye discussed.... But.... was there ever a difinative outcome that >> both sides would agree upon.....Therefor the discussion must continue.... > Its like comparing apples and pears, some people like apples, some like > pears, they are not the same. But we must agree that the amstrad CPC464 was > like a rotten peach, it should have been good but stank and looked like > something we did not want. I'm a speccy fanboy but enjoyed my vic20 but > cant > beat the spec for fun :) OK everyone has ready their soda, popcorn and flamethrower ? :D seriously, it's the usual attempt to ignite the perpetual flamewar.... Best reards from Italy, dott. Piergiorgio.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | spike1@freenet.co.uk |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-23 11:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <8dnf69-psb.ln1@librarian.sky.com> |
| In reply to | #853 |
And verily, didst dott.Piergiorgio <chiedetelo@ask.me> hastily babble thusly: > Il 23/04/2012 00:12, Wasted ha scritto: > >>>>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html > >>>>> Discuss. >>>> >>>> It has been discussed a gazillion times. >>> >>> aye discussed.... But.... was there ever a difinative outcome that >>> both sides would agree upon.....Therefor the discussion must continue.... > >> Its like comparing apples and pears, some people like apples, some like >> pears, they are not the same. But we must agree that the amstrad CPC464 was >> like a rotten peach, it should have been good but stank and looked like >> something we did not want. I'm a speccy fanboy but enjoyed my vic20 but >> cant >> beat the spec for fun :) > > OK everyone has ready their soda, popcorn and flamethrower ? :D > > seriously, it's the usual attempt to ignite the perpetual flamewar.... Special occasion today though innit? The spectrum's hit the big 3 0. -- | spike1@freenet.co.uk | | | Andrew Halliwell BSc | "ARSE! GERLS!! DRINK! DRINK! DRINK!!!" | | in | "THAT WOULD BE AN ECUMENICAL MATTER!...FECK!!!! | | Computer Science | - Father Jack in "Father Ted" |
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-23 19:17 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <4f953a47$0$11128$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #872 |
spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote: > And verily, didst dott.Piergiorgio <chiedetelo@ask.me> hastily babble > thusly: >> Il 23/04/2012 00:12, Wasted ha scritto: >> >>>>>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html >> >>>>>> Discuss. >>>>> >>>>> It has been discussed a gazillion times. >>>> >>>> aye discussed.... But.... was there ever a difinative outcome that >>>> both sides would agree upon.....Therefor the discussion must >>>> continue.... >> >>> Its like comparing apples and pears, some people like apples, some >>> like pears, they are not the same. But we must agree that the >>> amstrad CPC464 was like a rotten peach, it should have been good >>> but stank and looked like something we did not want. I'm a speccy >>> fanboy but enjoyed my vic20 but cant >>> beat the spec for fun :) >> >> OK everyone has ready their soda, popcorn and flamethrower ? :D >> >> seriously, it's the usual attempt to ignite the perpetual >> flamewar.... > > Special occasion today though innit? > The spectrum's hit the big 3 0. Nobody at the party?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | deKay <andyk@lofi-gaming.org.uk.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-23 20:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <alpine.OSX.2.00.1204232033400.2296@imac.dekay.sytes.net> |
| In reply to | #848 |
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, Dombo wrote: > Op 22-Apr-12 18:08, Chris Young schreef: >> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html >> >> Discuss. > > It has been discussed a gazillion times. Indeed. And the Spectrum was best every time. deKay -- Lofi Gaming - http://lofi-gaming.org.uk Gaming Diary - http://lofi-gaming.org.uk/diary Blog - http://lofi-gaming.org.uk/blog My computer runs at 3.5MHz and I'm proud of that
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-24 19:54 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <4f96942e$0$11125$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #881 |
deKay wrote: > On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, Dombo wrote: > >> Op 22-Apr-12 18:08, Chris Young schreef: >>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html >>> >>> Discuss. >> >> It has been discussed a gazillion times. > > Indeed. And the C64 was best every time. > Typo corrected.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | deKay <andyk@lofi-gaming.org.uk.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-24 15:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <alpine.OSX.2.00.1204241527350.2296@imac.dekay.sytes.net> |
| In reply to | #900 |
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Clocky wrote: >>> It has been discussed a gazillion times. >> >> Indeed. And the C64 was best every time. > > Typo incorrected. deKay -- Lofi Gaming - http://lofi-gaming.org.uk Gaming Diary - http://lofi-gaming.org.uk/diary Blog - http://lofi-gaming.org.uk/blog My computer runs at 3.5MHz and I'm proud of that
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-05-13 15:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <4fafd5c4$0$18697$91cee783@newsreader03.highway.telekom.at> |
| In reply to | #881 |
deKay wrote: > On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, Dombo wrote: > > > Op 22-Apr-12 18:08, Chris Young schreef: > > > http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html > > > > > > Discuss. > > > > It has been discussed a gazillion times. > > Indeed. And the Spectrum was best every time. > > deKay if not even better.... -- Daniel Mandic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-05-17 20:04 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <4fb4e90c$0$1760$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #985 |
Daniel Mandic wrote: > deKay wrote: > >> On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, Dombo wrote: >> >>> Op 22-Apr-12 18:08, Chris Young schreef: >>>> > http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html >>>> >>>> Discuss. >>> >>> It has been discussed a gazillion times. >> >> Indeed. And the Spectrum was best every time. >> >> deKay > > if not even better.... Only poor poverty stricken poms think that so they don't feel inadequate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jan van den Broek <fortytwo@xs4all.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-23 22:03 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <jfi.4F95C3A9.42.fortytwo@xs4all.nl> |
| In reply to | #848 |
Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:49:09 +0200
Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> schrieb:
>Op 22-Apr-12 18:08, Chris Young schreef:
>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html
>>
>> Discuss.
>
>It has been discussed a gazillion times.
And it will be discussed a gazillion times again.
--
Jan van den Broek balglaas@xs4all.nl
Entertaining Quakers since 2005
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | hp <ferd@farkel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-24 20:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jn7f8p$9ek$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #888 |
On 4/23/2012 5:03 PM, Jan van den Broek wrote: > Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:49:09 +0200 > Dombo<dombo@disposable.invalid> schrieb: >> Op 22-Apr-12 18:08, Chris Young schreef: >>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html >>> >>> Discuss. >> >> It has been discussed a gazillion times. > > And it will be discussed a gazillion times again. would it even be interesting to get the 'flame war hopeful' to explain the simple math error present in the C64 that was easily demonstrated?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetelo@ask.me> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-25 18:03 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <0fVlr.162453$GZ3.38128@tornado.fastwebnet.it> |
| In reply to | #923 |
Il 25/04/2012 02:07, hp ha scritto: > On 4/23/2012 5:03 PM, Jan van den Broek wrote: >> Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:49:09 +0200 >> Dombo<dombo@disposable.invalid> schrieb: >>> Op 22-Apr-12 18:08, Chris Young schreef: >>>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html >>>> >>>> >>>> Discuss. >>> >>> It has been discussed a gazillion times. >> >> And it will be discussed a gazillion times again. > > would it even be interesting to get the 'flame war hopeful' to explain > the simple math error present in the C64 that was easily demonstrated? oh, dear, I have given you earlier the perfect setting for this.... As I pointed earlier, these historical flamewars are like comparing apples with oranges, hence their longstandins (side question, I'm wrong but there aren't historical flamewar "X vs. Apple II" ?) Best regards from Italy, dott. Piergiorgio.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | lizardb0y <andrew.stephen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-22 15:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <18395052.796.1335132503245.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcqs8> |
| In reply to | #847 |
On Monday, 23 April 2012 04:08:55 UTC+12, Chris Young wrote: > http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html > > Discuss. Obviously the best computer was the one you could afford - and we could afford a second hand Speccy, so that settles it. -- lizardb0y Madman and Itinerant Bus Stop. http://www.vintage8bit.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-23 17:07 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <4f951bbc$0$11110$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #847 |
Chris Young wrote: > http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html > > Discuss. > There is nothing to compare. The Spectrum was cheaper, but it wasn't a proper computer so it's not even comparable on that point to the vastly superior in every aspect C64.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | spike1@freenet.co.uk |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-23 11:28 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ofnf69-psb.ln1@librarian.sky.com> |
| In reply to | #866 |
And verily, didst Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> hastily babble thusly: > Chris Young wrote: >> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html >> >> Discuss. >> > There is nothing to compare. The Spectrum was cheaper, but it wasn't a > proper computer so it's not even comparable on that point to the vastly > superior in every aspect C64. Even the ZX80 was a PROPER computer, silly. Bet alan turing would've been drooling over even that if you showed it him. -- | |What to do if you find yourself stuck in a crack| | spike1@freenet.co.uk |in the ground beneath a giant boulder, which you| | |can't move, with no hope of rescue. | | Andrew Halliwell BSc |Consider how lucky you are that life has been | | in |good to you so far... | | Computer Science | -The BOOK, Hitch-hiker's guide to the galaxy.|
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Clocky" <notgonn@happen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-23 19:16 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <4f9539e0$0$11113$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #871 |
spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote: > And verily, didst Clocky <notgonn@happen.com> hastily babble thusly: >> Chris Young wrote: >>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html >>> >>> Discuss. >>> >> There is nothing to compare. The Spectrum was cheaper, but it wasn't >> a proper computer so it's not even comparable on that point to the >> vastly superior in every aspect C64. > > Even the ZX80 was a PROPER computer, silly. Cheap shoddy rubbish is all it was.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "dott.Piergiorgio" <chiedetelo@ask.me> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-23 21:44 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <hiilr.161766$GZ3.62158@tornado.fastwebnet.it> |
| In reply to | #873 |
Il 23/04/2012 13:16, Clocky ha scritto: > spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote: >> And verily, didst Clocky<notgonn@happen.com> hastily babble thusly: >>> Chris Young wrote: >>>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a377768/zx-spectrum-vs-commodore-64-gamings-greatest-rivalry.html >>>> >>>> Discuss. >>>> >>> There is nothing to compare. The Spectrum was cheaper, but it wasn't >>> a proper computer so it's not even comparable on that point to the >>> vastly superior in every aspect C64. >> >> Even the ZX80 was a PROPER computer, silly. > > Cheap shoddy rubbish is all it was. try to cram a 64 +1541+ a 7"-8" portable TV screen in a trunk full of carefully packaged telescopes then set up and run this in the backseat of a car in the middle of nowhere having to use only a car battery as power source.... Best regards from Italy, dott. Piergiorgio.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 5 [1] 2 3 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.sinclair
csiph-web