Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.sinclair > #274 > unrolled thread

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.sinclair

Contents

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw rogerjowett <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 18:00 -0700
    Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw rogerjowett <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2011-06-25 18:13 -0700
      Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw kylb <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2012-07-20 07:51 -0700
        Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw Guesser <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> - 2012-07-20 21:37 +0100
        Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw guesser <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2012-07-25 16:27 -0700
          Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw Guesser <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> - 2012-07-26 00:36 +0100
            Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw spike1@freenet.co.uk - 2012-07-26 12:17 +0100
    Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw rogerjowett <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 20:19 -0700
      Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw korax1214 <korax1214@gmail.com> - 2011-07-06 15:51 -0700
        Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw sam coupe <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2012-06-22 08:09 -0700
          Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw Guesser <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> - 2012-06-22 16:16 +0100
            Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw korax1214@gmail.com - 2012-06-22 16:16 -0700
              Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw Guesser <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> - 2012-06-23 00:20 +0100
                Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw "Brian Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-06-23 08:24 +0100
            Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw "Brian Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-06-23 08:22 +0100
              Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw kylb <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2012-07-09 07:41 -0700
                Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw Guesser <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> - 2012-07-09 16:52 +0100
                  Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw kylb <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2012-07-15 09:14 -0700
                    Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw Guesser <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> - 2012-07-15 17:20 +0100
                      Re: Busted! (Was: some youtube URL) ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-07-16 09:18 +0100
                        Re: Busted! (Was: some youtube URL) Guesser <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> - 2012-07-16 12:56 +0100
                        Re: Busted! (Was: some youtube URL) kylb <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2012-07-16 08:59 -0700
                          Re: Busted! (Was: some youtube URL) Guesser <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> - 2012-07-16 19:16 +0100
                            Re: Busted! (Was: some youtube URL) korax1214@gmail.com - 2012-07-16 17:10 -0700
                              Re: Busted! (Was: some youtube URL) Guesser <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> - 2012-07-17 02:01 +0100
                          Re: Busted! (Was: some youtube URL) "Brian Gaff" <Briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-07-18 04:08 +0100
                            Re: Busted! (Was: some youtube URL) kylb <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2012-07-20 07:46 -0700
            Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw guesser <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2012-07-30 12:13 -0700
          Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw "Brian Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-06-23 08:19 +0100

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#274 — http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw

micro command speech unit - any info?
hi
anyone know anything about the z80a? clock speed? is it contentioned
by the ula? how much ram/rom - can either be modified? - how does it
communicate with other one? thru port?
can i replace the Rom with a bbc basic one?
would it ignore the z80a-just like it ignores the 128k of ram and
ay8912 on 128s?
ditto sam coupe audio/video - if we ever get a conversion?

has anyone got a spectrum pc emulator supported hardware list?
when it says interface1 disciple - it cant use teh serial port as a
virtual connection to the pc or the network or internet - nor the
network on the speccy ? even between more than one instance of the
same emualtor running on the same pc? - how does a process on the pc
know how many resources are availble as each instance of itself is
run?
why doesnt pc do full spectrum tv emulation - crosstalk
synchronization and phophoric decay
fix fullscreen at hi rez and use vga chipset features for more than
one pixel per spectrum pixel also far more colours?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#290

On Jun 23, 2:00 am, rogerjowett <rogerjow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw
>
> micro command speech unit - any info?
> hi
> anyone know anything about the z80a? clock speed? is it contentioned
> by the ula? how much ram/rom - can either be modified? - how does it
> communicate with other one? thru port?
> can i replace the Rom with a bbc basic one?
> would it ignore the z80a-just like it ignores the 128k of ram and
> ay8912 on 128s?
> ditto sam coupe audio/video - if we ever get a conversion?
>
> has anyone got a spectrum pc emulator supported hardware list?
> when it says interface1 disciple - it cant use teh serial port as a
> virtual connection to the pc or the network or internet - nor the
> network on the speccy ? even between more than one instance of the
> same emualtor running on the same pc? - how does a process on the pc
> know how many resources are availble as each instance of itself is
> run?
> why doesnt pc do full spectrum tv emulation - crosstalk
> synchronization and phophoric decay
> fix fullscreen at hi rez and use vga chipset features for more than
> one pixel per spectrum pixel also far more colours?

2mhz z80A
it cant be modified?
rom replaced with ram - more ram added? 4mhz clock?
is it compatibel with the MB-02+ DMA interface? DIVIDE ? ZX ATA? any
other modern IDE mass storage device - could load old rom fom mass
storge if it was replaced with ram
no way to develop it as a coprocessor?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1360

absolutely no one interested in seeing 48k SNApshots running at 6mhz?
snapper disc from velesoft site?
needs sim coupe external ram 1-4mb and masterdos
is it impossible i tried and failed as per

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1361

On 20/07/2012 15:51, kylb wrote:
> absolutely no one interested in seeing 48k SNApshots running at 6mhz?

Put it this way, how many times have you asked already?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1368

On Friday, 20 July 2012 15:51:01 UTC+1, guesser  wrote:
> absolutely no one interested in seeing 48k SNApshots running at 6mhz?
> snapper disc from velesoft site?
> needs sim coupe external ram 1-4mb and masterdos
> is it impossible i tried and failed as per

http://www.benophetinternet.nl/hobby/sales.htm

half an hour to post a link
actually the £160 MB-02+ is hear 
but dont ask what it does to a serial port or how it adds a second video ram page to a 48 or other such questiosn as they are all spam
including +2ab3 kompatiblity
DMA to border port 2t or 4?
see velesoft site multitech
DMA to border port buzzer&/or ay8912?
sam saa1099? + border port buzzer not to mention hmpr bit 5&6 for mode 3 interlaced 512x384 16 colours from 128? no one interested?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1369

On 26/07/2012 00:27, guesser wrote:
> a load of shite about MB-02 and DMA

I most certainly did *not*

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1372

And verily, didst Guesser <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> hastily babble thusly:
> On 26/07/2012 00:27, guesser wrote:
>> a load of shite about MB-02 and DMA
> 
> I most certainly did *not*

OO, you did too...
You've been jowett all along! you fiend!
-- 
|   spike1@freenet.co,uk   | "Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky?"   |
|   Andrew Halliwell BSc   |                                                 |
|            in            | "I think so brain, but this time, you control   |
|     Computer Science     |  the Encounter suit, and I'll do the voice..."  |

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#303

On Jun 23, 2:00 am, rogerjowett <rogerjow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmwW_6kUdHw
>
> micro command speech unit - any info?
> hi
> anyone know anything about the z80a? clock speed? is it contentioned
> by the ula? how much ram/rom - can either be modified? - how does it
> communicate with other one? thru port?
> can i replace the Rom with a bbc basic one?
> would it ignore the z80a-just like it ignores the 128k of ram and
> ay8912 on 128s?
> ditto sam coupe audio/video - if we ever get a conversion?
>
> has anyone got a spectrum pc emulator supported hardware list?
> when it says interface1 disciple - it cant use teh serial port as a
> virtual connection to the pc or the network or internet - nor the
> network on the speccy ? even between more than one instance of the
> same emualtor running on the same pc? - how does a process on the pc
> know how many resources are availble as each instance of itself is
> run?
> why doesnt pc do full spectrum tv emulation - crosstalk
> synchronization and phophoric decay
> fix fullscreen at hi rez and use vga chipset features for more than
> one pixel per spectrum pixel also far more colours?

https://skydrive.live.com/?wa=wsignin1.0&cid=1c842d5b23e1e0e2#cid=1C842D5B23E1E0E2&id=1C842D5B23E1E0E2%21836

7 didnt scan terribly well
kind of weird i managed to scan pci interfaces dead easy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#316

A word to the wise:  posting a Usenet thread with a URL as the subject
line is a phenomenally bad idea, as a lot of spam does this, hence
many people have a kill filter to delete all such posts.  I can only
see this one because I'm on Google, not Usenet as usual.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1266

On Wednesday, 6 July 2011 23:51:14 UTC+1, korax1214  wrote:
> A word to the wise:  posting a Usenet thread with a URL as the subject
> line is a phenomenally bad idea, as a lot of spam does this, hence
> many people have a kill filter to delete all such posts.  I can only
> see this one because I'm on Google, not Usenet as usual.

gotcha
only rwap did the same thing using the smellmyrek forum pages and his had the two letters
RE infront of the link
if you selected these two letters exactly then you could go to the main body of the email message - for which you get notifications in your email inbox to which notifications you are not allowed to reply though the email address used in the notification and the workding of the notification makes no mention of this
don't forget you pay full price you get 3% of what you are paying for
no hardware compression its against the law
no highest encryption level setting wither that might help protect your machine
you dont understand lcds' bmp2scr program at all?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1268

On 22/06/2012 16:09, sam coupe wrote:
> if you selected these two letters exactly then you could go to the main body of the email message - for which you get notifications in your email inbox to which notifications you are not allowed to reply though the email address used in the notification and the workding of the notification makes no mention of this
What do emails have to do with Usenet threads?

> don't forget you pay full price you get 3% of what you are paying for
> no hardware compression its against the law
> no highest encryption level setting wither that might help protect your machine
What the hell are you talking about and how does it relate to the 
message you are replying to?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1269

On Friday, June 22, 2012 4:16:23 PM UTC+1, Guesser wrote:
> On 22/06/2012 16:09, sam coupe wrote:
> > if you selected these two letters exactly then you could go to the main body of the email message - for which you get notifications in your email inbox to which notifications you are not allowed to reply though the email address used in the notification and the workding of the notification makes no mention of this
> What do emails have to do with Usenet threads?
> 
> > don't forget you pay full price you get 3% of what you are paying for
> > no hardware compression its against the law
> > no highest encryption level setting wither that might help protect your machine
> What the hell are you talking about and how does it relate to the 
> message you are replying to?

Guesser, remember that you're replying to someone who's daft enough to use a URL as the *subject* of a Usenet post -- I doubt that even he has the faintest clue what he's on about. :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1270

On 23/06/2012 00:16, korax1214@gmail.com wrote:
> Guesser, remember that you're replying to someone who's daft enough to use a URL as the *subject* of a Usenet post -- I doubt that even he has the faintest clue what he's on about. :)
>

Yes but you have to give him enough rope...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1274

Rope? I was once told that if I kept on top posting I'd need less rope to 
hang myself. I thought that was quite funny!

Brian

-- 
--
From the sofa of Brian Gaff -
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Guesser" <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> wrote in message 
news:js2uin$87s$1@dont-email.me...
> On 23/06/2012 00:16, korax1214@gmail.com wrote:
>> Guesser, remember that you're replying to someone who's daft enough to 
>> use a URL as the *subject* of a Usenet post -- I doubt that even he has 
>> the faintest clue what he's on about. :)
>>
>
> Yes but you have to give him enough rope... 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1273

Has everyone taken leave of their senses. its like waking up in a foreign 
country where the language looks like English, but eh meanings are so obtuse 
and vague you have no idea of what they mean!


There are a lot of people who block news posts that come from Google groups 
as most are tending toward spam or clueless idiots whoc don't know their 
usenet from their arese.

Brian

-- 
--
From the sofa of Brian Gaff -
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Guesser" <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> wrote in message 
news:js227r$bnc$2@dont-email.me...
> On 22/06/2012 16:09, sam coupe wrote:
>> if you selected these two letters exactly then you could go to the main 
>> body of the email message - for which you get notifications in your email 
>> inbox to which notifications you are not allowed to reply though the 
>> email address used in the notification and the workding of the 
>> notification makes no mention of this
> What do emails have to do with Usenet threads?
>
>> don't forget you pay full price you get 3% of what you are paying for
>> no hardware compression its against the law
>> no highest encryption level setting wither that might help protect your 
>> machine
> What the hell are you talking about and how does it relate to the message 
> you are replying to? 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1343

On Saturday, June 23, 2012 8:22:49 AM UTC+1, Brian Gaff wrote:
> Has everyone taken leave of their senses. its like waking up in a foreign 
> country where the language looks like English, but eh meanings are so obtuse 
> and vague you have no idea of what they mean!
> 
> 
> There are a lot of people who block news posts that come from Google groups 
> as most are tending toward spam or clueless idiots whoc don't know their 
> usenet from their arese.
> 
> Brian
> 
> -- 
> --
> From the sofa of Brian Gaff -
> briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
> Blind user, so no pictures please!
> "Guesser" <alistair@alistairsserver.no-ip.org> wrote in message 
> news:js227r$bnc$2@dont-email.me...
> > On 22/06/2012 16:09, sam coupe wrote:
> >> if you selected these two letters exactly then you could go to the main 
> >> body of the email message - for which you get notifications in your email 
> >> inbox to which notifications you are not allowed to reply though the 
> >> email address used in the notification and the workding of the 
> >> notification makes no mention of this
> > What do emails have to do with Usenet threads?
> >
> >> don't forget you pay full price you get 3% of what you are paying for
> >> no hardware compression its against the law
> >> no highest encryption level setting wither that might help protect your 
> >> machine
> > What the hell are you talking about and how does it relate to the message 
> > you are replying to?

no im pisces

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1344

On 09/07/2012 15:41, kylb wrote:
>
> no im pisces
>

Are you saying no just to be negative?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1349

On Monday, July 9, 2012 4:52:07 PM UTC+1, Guesser wrote:
> On 09/07/2012 15:41, kylb wrote:
> >
> > no im pisces
> >
> 
> Are you saying no just to be negative?

he said he was aireez

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1350

On 15/07/2012 17:14, kylb wrote:
> On Monday, July 9, 2012 4:52:07 PM UTC+1, Guesser wrote:
>> On 09/07/2012 15:41, kylb wrote:
>> >
>> > no im pisces
>> >
>>
>> Are you saying no just to be negative?
>
> he said he was aireez
>

What does that suggest to you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1351 — Re: Busted! (Was: some youtube URL)

On 15/07/12 17:20, Guesser wrote:
>> On Monday, July 9, 2012 4:52:07 PM UTC+1, Guesser wrote:
>>> Are you saying no just to be negative?
> What does that suggest to you?
Guesser, are you running an ELIZA at your end, just to elicit more dopey 
responses from RJ?
/me is *sure* he recognises those two lines as ELIZA triggers.
-e
-- 
'sane', adj.: see 'unimaginative'
   on the web - http://jttlov.no-ip.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.sinclair

csiph-web