Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.sinclair > #2107 > unrolled thread
| Started by | hp <ferd@farkel.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-03-18 23:15 -0400 |
| Last post | 2013-03-24 08:31 -0700 |
| Articles | 13 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.sinclair
observation made hp <ferd@farkel.net> - 2013-03-18 23:15 -0400
Re: observation made deKay <andyk@lofi-gaming.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-03-19 08:28 +0000
Re: observation made spike1@freenet.co.uk - 2013-03-19 14:51 +0000
Re: observation made Matthew Westcott <gasman@raww.org> - 2013-03-19 17:45 +0000
Re: observation made Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> - 2013-03-19 22:37 +0000
Re: observation made jgharston <jgh@mdfs.net> - 2013-03-19 12:42 -0700
Re: observation made Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> - 2013-03-19 22:37 +0000
Re: observation made hp <ferd@farkel.net> - 2013-03-20 12:49 -0400
Re: observation made hp <ferd@farkel.net> - 2013-03-20 13:02 -0400
Re: observation made "Chris Young" <chris.usenet@mail-filter.com> - 2013-03-20 00:03 +0100
Re: observation made Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> - 2013-03-20 08:51 +0000
Re: observation made SamTek <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2013-03-24 08:28 -0700
Re: observation made SamTek <rogerjowett@gmail.com> - 2013-03-24 08:31 -0700
| From | hp <ferd@farkel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-18 23:15 -0400 |
| Subject | observation made |
| Message-ID | <ki8l90$i12$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
some time ago I latched onto some Sinclair related torrents that are: ZX-Spectrum.7z a LOT of spectrum ROM's TAP's etc YourSinclair pdf's of all the Your Sinclair issues Roms - Sinclair Zx Spectrum - Games 80+90.rar ( self explanatory) and SinclairUser pdf's of all the Sinclair User Issues They continue to be active uploads from my sharing, so Folks out there are still downloading stuff somewhere. when I look (ok also when my torrent program is running) I see activity for these still. anutter 'Humm" Anyone recall the comp.sys.sinclair Team SETI project participation? Is the 'team' still operational? Anyone doing it any more?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | deKay <andyk@lofi-gaming.org.uk.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-19 08:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <alpine.OSX.2.00.1303190828300.4645@iMac.dekay.sytes.net> |
| In reply to | #2107 |
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, hp wrote: > some time ago I latched onto some Sinclair related > torrents that are: > > ZX-Spectrum.7z a LOT of spectrum ROM's TAP's etc > > YourSinclair pdf's of all the Your Sinclair issues > > Roms - Sinclair Zx Spectrum - Games 80+90.rar > ( self explanatory) > > and > > SinclairUser pdf's of all the Sinclair User Issues Oooh! Ta! deKay -- Lofi Gaming - http://lofi-gaming.org.uk Gaming Diary - http://lofi-gaming.org.uk/diary Blog - http://lofi-gaming.org.uk/blog My computer runs at 3.5MHz and I'm proud of that
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | spike1@freenet.co.uk |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-19 14:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dkam1a-5j5.ln1@librarian.sky.com> |
| In reply to | #2107 |
And verily, didst hp <ferd@farkel.net> hastily babble thusly: > Anyone recall the comp.sys.sinclair Team SETI project > participation? Is the 'team' still operational? > Anyone doing it any more? My god, that was over 10 years ago! I doubt it lasted beyond 2005 that thing. I used to be a part of it and I've not run seti since about then. Think that was just a passing fad. Besides, since then much more worthy uses of distributed computing like folding@home cropped up. (protein folding, much more beneficial than finding an alien civilisation that's so far away we'll never be able to do anything about it anyway) -- | spike1@freenet.co.uk | Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a | | | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit | | Andrew Halliwell BSc | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit | | in |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that| | Computer Science | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Matthew Westcott <gasman@raww.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-19 17:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <aqrmh0F4a5vU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2110 |
On 19/03/2013 14:51, spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote: > Besides, since then much more worthy uses of distributed computing like > folding@home cropped up. (protein folding, much more beneficial than finding > an alien civilisation that's so far away we'll never be able to do anything > about it anyway) We've also increasingly moved on to computers that blow hot air at your knees whenever they're being used to full capacity, and stay nice and quiet and cool the rest of the time (as opposed to 2005-era computers that sounded like jet engines no matter what), which tends to dispel the notion of all this free computing power going to waste.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-19 22:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kiapab$8kq$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2111 |
On 19/03/2013 17:45, Matthew Westcott wrote: > On 19/03/2013 14:51, spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote: >> Besides, since then much more worthy uses of distributed computing like >> folding@home cropped up. (protein folding, much more beneficial than >> finding >> an alien civilisation that's so far away we'll never be able to do >> anything >> about it anyway) > > We've also increasingly moved on to computers that blow hot air at your > knees whenever they're being used to full capacity, and stay nice and > quiet and cool the rest of the time (as opposed to 2005-era computers > that sounded like jet engines no matter what), which tends to dispel the > notion of all this free computing power going to waste. > So, about that steak I owe you. Are you visiting London any time soon, or can you recommend a steakhouse in Oxford?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jgharston <jgh@mdfs.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-19 12:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d88eae59-abab-4ab8-a1d3-dffff01fb522@hq4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2107 |
hp wrote: > ZX-Spectrum.7z a LOT of spectrum ROM's TAP's etc > YourSinclair pdf's of all the Your Sinclair issues > Roms - Sinclair Zx Spectrum - Games 80+90.rar > ( self explanatory) > SinclairUser pdf's of all the Sinclair User Issues The plural of cat is cats. The plural of dog is dogs. See how it works? The plural of ROM is ROMs. The plural of TAP is TAPs. The plural of PDF is PDFs. JGH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-19 22:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kiapc1$8kq$3@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2112 |
On 19/03/2013 19:42, jgharston wrote: > hp wrote: >> ZX-Spectrum.7z a LOT of spectrum ROM's TAP's etc >> YourSinclair pdf's of all the Your Sinclair issues >> Roms - Sinclair Zx Spectrum - Games 80+90.rar >> ( self explanatory) >> SinclairUser pdf's of all the Sinclair User Issues > > The plural of cat is cats. > The plural of dog is dogs. > See how it works? > The plural of ROM is ROMs. > The plural of TAP is TAPs. > The plural of PDF is PDFs. > > JGH > Apostrophe pedantry is so 1990's. :p
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | hp <ferd@farkel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-20 12:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <kicpba$8ka$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2115 |
On 3/19/2013 6:37 PM, Andrew Owen wrote: > On 19/03/2013 19:42, jgharston wrote: >> hp wrote: >>> ZX-Spectrum.7z a LOT of spectrum ROM's TAP's etc >>> YourSinclair pdf's of all the Your Sinclair issues >>> Roms - Sinclair Zx Spectrum - Games 80+90.rar >>> ( self explanatory) >>> SinclairUser pdf's of all the Sinclair User Issues >> >> The plural of cat is cats. >> The plural of dog is dogs. >> See how it works? >> The plural of ROM is ROMs. >> The plural of TAP is TAPs. >> The plural of PDF is PDFs. >> >> JGH >> > Apostrophe pedantry is so 1990's. :p can't I like the possessiveness of using '?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | hp <ferd@farkel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-20 13:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <kicq3n$bb7$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2120 |
On 3/20/2013 12:49 PM, hp wrote: > On 3/19/2013 6:37 PM, Andrew Owen wrote: >> On 19/03/2013 19:42, jgharston wrote: >>> hp wrote: >>>> ZX-Spectrum.7z a LOT of spectrum ROM's TAP's etc >>>> YourSinclair pdf's of all the Your Sinclair issues >>>> Roms - Sinclair Zx Spectrum - Games 80+90.rar >>>> ( self explanatory) >>>> SinclairUser pdf's of all the Sinclair User Issues >>> >>> The plural of cat is cats. >>> The plural of dog is dogs. >>> See how it works? >>> The plural of ROM is ROMs. >>> The plural of TAP is TAPs. >>> The plural of PDF is PDFs. >>> >>> JGH >>> >> Apostrophe pedantry is so 1990's. :p > > can't I like the possessiveness of using '? At least I didn't try and employ a palindromic malapropism. :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris Young" <chris.usenet@mail-filter.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-20 00:03 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <5148FCED.MD-1.4.17.chris.young@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #2112 |
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:42:56 -0700 (PDT) da kidz on comp.sys.sinclair were rappin' to MC jgharston: > The plural of ROM is ROMs. Whilst I'm a fan of the apostrophe police as much as the next man, the issue here is not the misplaced apostrophes, but the fact they are unlikely to actually be ROM images. Chris -- +-------------------------------------------+ | Unsatisfactory Software - "because it is" | | http://www.unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk | | Your Sinclair: A Celebration | +- http://www.yoursinclair.co.uk -----------+ DISCLAIMER: I may be making all this stuff up again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Owen <aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-20 08:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kibtav$n6t$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2116 |
On 19/03/2013 23:03, Chris Young wrote: > On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:42:56 -0700 (PDT) da kidz on comp.sys.sinclair were rappin' > to MC jgharston: > >> The plural of ROM is ROMs. > > Whilst I'm a fan of the apostrophe police as much as the next man, the > issue here is not the misplaced apostrophes, but the fact they are > unlikely to actually be ROM images. Good point. Burn him!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SamTek <rogerjowett@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-24 08:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <90ccc448-be02-42b8-b846-0d38653feba7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2112 |
128k cant bank switch into rom area - unless it has interface 2 cartrdige of 256kb from Paul Farrow only +2ab3 can do the ram in rom area that and the sam coupe i know i know eggnchips
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SamTek <rogerjowett@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-24 08:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b8d5a680-69c3-4fa9-a34d-e7683d751aa0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2112 |
plural of BBC is whole in pocket oh and dont let the poor kids onthem we dont want them earning money - line up now and walk forwards slowly...
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.sinclair
csiph-web